基于工程和集体无意识在赫尔曼hesses Demian(1919年)在Urtrost(1924年),Á朗Tamá嗣.比较

Réka Jakabházi
{"title":"基于工程和集体无意识在赫尔曼hesses Demian(1919年)在Urtrost(1924年),Á朗Tamá嗣.比较","authors":"Réka Jakabházi","doi":"10.2478/gb-2021-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of the present article is to provide a comparative analysis between two important works of German and Hungarian literature on the background of the theory of Carl Gustav Jung’s theory of archetypes. Both works (the novel Demian by Hermann Hesse and the drama Erstwhile Solace [Ősvigasztalás] by Áron Tamási) approach the theme of the search for identity as well as for the absolute and the divinity, with the focus on the archetypes of the collective unconscious. Motifs such as androgyny, shadow or dream, the issue of polarity and unity form common points of contact between the two analysed literary works.","PeriodicalId":183404,"journal":{"name":"Germanistische Beiträge","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Archetypen und das kollektive Unbewusste in hermann hesses Demian (1919) und in Urtrost (1924) von Áron Tamási. Ein Vergleich\",\"authors\":\"Réka Jakabházi\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/gb-2021-0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The aim of the present article is to provide a comparative analysis between two important works of German and Hungarian literature on the background of the theory of Carl Gustav Jung’s theory of archetypes. Both works (the novel Demian by Hermann Hesse and the drama Erstwhile Solace [Ősvigasztalás] by Áron Tamási) approach the theme of the search for identity as well as for the absolute and the divinity, with the focus on the archetypes of the collective unconscious. Motifs such as androgyny, shadow or dream, the issue of polarity and unity form common points of contact between the two analysed literary works.\",\"PeriodicalId\":183404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Germanistische Beiträge\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Germanistische Beiträge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/gb-2021-0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Germanistische Beiträge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/gb-2021-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文以荣格的原型理论为背景,对德国和匈牙利两部重要文学作品进行比较分析。这两部作品(赫尔曼·黑塞的小说《德米安》和Áron Tamási的戏剧《往日的慰藉》[Ősvigasztalás])都探讨了寻找身份、绝对和神性的主题,重点是集体无意识的原型。双性同体、影或梦、极性与统一性问题等母题构成了这两部文学作品的共同契合点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Archetypen und das kollektive Unbewusste in hermann hesses Demian (1919) und in Urtrost (1924) von Áron Tamási. Ein Vergleich
Abstract The aim of the present article is to provide a comparative analysis between two important works of German and Hungarian literature on the background of the theory of Carl Gustav Jung’s theory of archetypes. Both works (the novel Demian by Hermann Hesse and the drama Erstwhile Solace [Ősvigasztalás] by Áron Tamási) approach the theme of the search for identity as well as for the absolute and the divinity, with the focus on the archetypes of the collective unconscious. Motifs such as androgyny, shadow or dream, the issue of polarity and unity form common points of contact between the two analysed literary works.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信