宪法裁决第68号/PUU-XII/2014号对人权问题跨宗教婚姻的分析

Y. Syofyan
{"title":"宪法裁决第68号/PUU-XII/2014号对人权问题跨宗教婚姻的分析","authors":"Y. Syofyan","doi":"10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The validity of marriage in Indonesia is considered to have religious overtones, religious elements that dominate the requirements for a valid marriage, so there is a degradation of the achievement of the unification goal of the Marriage Law which refers to the uniformity of holding marriages for every citizen. Pluralism in Indonesia with its diversity of ethnicities and nations is not actually an obstacle for a woman and a man in Indonesia to get married. The vulnerability to interfaith marriages is quite high due to the large number of religious diversity that is recognized by the constitution but interfaith marriages are marriages that are prohibited and not recognized by the Marriage Law in Indonesia. In the perspective of Human Rights (HAM) religious marriage is not prohibited and freedom is given to brides and grooms of different religions to be able to carry out the marriage (non-derogable rights). This research is a legal research (doctrinal research) with a conceptual approach (conceptual approach), the legal approach (statues approach), and the case approach (cases approach). The results of this study explain first, the Court, in the life of the nation and state based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution, religion is the basis and the state has an interest in matters of marriage, it cannot only be seen from a purely formal aspect, but must also be seen from a spiritual and social aspect. Religion determines the validity of marriage. Second, interfaith marriage is part of the universal right that every individual has to carry out marriages to brides of different religions and marriage is part of a right that cannot be limited and reduced by differences in religion.","PeriodicalId":193737,"journal":{"name":"UNES Law Review","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 68/PUU-XII/2014 tentang Perkawinan Beda Agama dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia\",\"authors\":\"Y. Syofyan\",\"doi\":\"10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The validity of marriage in Indonesia is considered to have religious overtones, religious elements that dominate the requirements for a valid marriage, so there is a degradation of the achievement of the unification goal of the Marriage Law which refers to the uniformity of holding marriages for every citizen. Pluralism in Indonesia with its diversity of ethnicities and nations is not actually an obstacle for a woman and a man in Indonesia to get married. The vulnerability to interfaith marriages is quite high due to the large number of religious diversity that is recognized by the constitution but interfaith marriages are marriages that are prohibited and not recognized by the Marriage Law in Indonesia. In the perspective of Human Rights (HAM) religious marriage is not prohibited and freedom is given to brides and grooms of different religions to be able to carry out the marriage (non-derogable rights). This research is a legal research (doctrinal research) with a conceptual approach (conceptual approach), the legal approach (statues approach), and the case approach (cases approach). The results of this study explain first, the Court, in the life of the nation and state based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution, religion is the basis and the state has an interest in matters of marriage, it cannot only be seen from a purely formal aspect, but must also be seen from a spiritual and social aspect. Religion determines the validity of marriage. Second, interfaith marriage is part of the universal right that every individual has to carry out marriages to brides of different religions and marriage is part of a right that cannot be limited and reduced by differences in religion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UNES Law Review\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UNES Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.837\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNES Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在印度尼西亚,婚姻的有效性被认为具有宗教色彩,宗教因素主导了有效婚姻的要求,因此,《婚姻法》统一目标的实现出现了退化,该目标指的是为每个公民统一举行婚姻。在印度尼西亚,种族和国家的多元化实际上并不是男女结婚的障碍。由于宪法承认的大量宗教多样性,跨宗教婚姻的脆弱性相当高,但印度尼西亚的《婚姻法》禁止和不承认跨宗教婚姻。从人权的角度来看,不禁止宗教婚姻,并给予不同宗教的新娘和新郎能够举行婚姻的自由(不可减损的权利)。本研究是一种具有概念方法(conceptual approach)、法律方法(雕像方法)和案例方法(cases approach)的法律研究(doctrinal research)。本研究的结果首先解释了法院,在基于潘卡西拉和1945年宪法的民族和国家生活中,宗教是基础,国家对婚姻事务有兴趣,它不能只从纯粹的形式方面来看,还必须从精神和社会方面来看。宗教决定婚姻的有效性。第二,不同宗教间的婚姻是一项普遍权利的一部分,每个人都有权与不同宗教的新娘结婚,婚姻是一项权利的一部分,不能因宗教差异而受到限制和削弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 68/PUU-XII/2014 tentang Perkawinan Beda Agama dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia
The validity of marriage in Indonesia is considered to have religious overtones, religious elements that dominate the requirements for a valid marriage, so there is a degradation of the achievement of the unification goal of the Marriage Law which refers to the uniformity of holding marriages for every citizen. Pluralism in Indonesia with its diversity of ethnicities and nations is not actually an obstacle for a woman and a man in Indonesia to get married. The vulnerability to interfaith marriages is quite high due to the large number of religious diversity that is recognized by the constitution but interfaith marriages are marriages that are prohibited and not recognized by the Marriage Law in Indonesia. In the perspective of Human Rights (HAM) religious marriage is not prohibited and freedom is given to brides and grooms of different religions to be able to carry out the marriage (non-derogable rights). This research is a legal research (doctrinal research) with a conceptual approach (conceptual approach), the legal approach (statues approach), and the case approach (cases approach). The results of this study explain first, the Court, in the life of the nation and state based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution, religion is the basis and the state has an interest in matters of marriage, it cannot only be seen from a purely formal aspect, but must also be seen from a spiritual and social aspect. Religion determines the validity of marriage. Second, interfaith marriage is part of the universal right that every individual has to carry out marriages to brides of different religions and marriage is part of a right that cannot be limited and reduced by differences in religion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信