对照实验与众包数据在听觉反应时间评价中的结果和有效性对比

H. Nagy, Á. Csapó, G. Wersényi
{"title":"对照实验与众包数据在听觉反应时间评价中的结果和有效性对比","authors":"H. Nagy, Á. Csapó, G. Wersényi","doi":"10.1109/COGINFOCOM.2016.7804586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We developed an application for the Android platform to test reaction times to auditory stimuli on mobile devices. During tests, users were asked to respond as quickly as possible to auditory events provided through headphone playback, and to also identify the directions of those events based on stereo panning. This paper presents a comparative evaluation of data (i.e. response times in seconds and error rates) collected through controlled supervised experiments as opposed to a crowdsourcing based solution. It is demonstrated that in some respects, crowdsourced data and laboratory data show similar results within their own category, but that at the same time a statistical comparison between the two measurement configurations is difficult due to the significant amount of noisy (outlier) data in the crowdsourced case.","PeriodicalId":440408,"journal":{"name":"2016 7th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom)","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrasting results and effectiveness of controlled experiments with crowdsourced data in the evaluation of auditory reaction times\",\"authors\":\"H. Nagy, Á. Csapó, G. Wersényi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COGINFOCOM.2016.7804586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We developed an application for the Android platform to test reaction times to auditory stimuli on mobile devices. During tests, users were asked to respond as quickly as possible to auditory events provided through headphone playback, and to also identify the directions of those events based on stereo panning. This paper presents a comparative evaluation of data (i.e. response times in seconds and error rates) collected through controlled supervised experiments as opposed to a crowdsourcing based solution. It is demonstrated that in some respects, crowdsourced data and laboratory data show similar results within their own category, but that at the same time a statistical comparison between the two measurement configurations is difficult due to the significant amount of noisy (outlier) data in the crowdsourced case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":440408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 7th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom)\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 7th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COGINFOCOM.2016.7804586\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 7th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COGINFOCOM.2016.7804586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们为Android平台开发了一个应用程序,用于测试移动设备对听觉刺激的反应时间。在测试中,用户被要求尽可能快地对耳机播放提供的听觉事件做出反应,并根据立体声平移识别这些事件的方向。本文介绍了通过控制监督实验收集的数据(即以秒为单位的响应时间和错误率)的比较评估,而不是基于众包的解决方案。研究表明,在某些方面,众包数据和实验室数据在各自的类别中显示出相似的结果,但同时,由于众包情况下大量的噪声(离群值)数据,两种测量配置之间的统计比较是困难的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contrasting results and effectiveness of controlled experiments with crowdsourced data in the evaluation of auditory reaction times
We developed an application for the Android platform to test reaction times to auditory stimuli on mobile devices. During tests, users were asked to respond as quickly as possible to auditory events provided through headphone playback, and to also identify the directions of those events based on stereo panning. This paper presents a comparative evaluation of data (i.e. response times in seconds and error rates) collected through controlled supervised experiments as opposed to a crowdsourcing based solution. It is demonstrated that in some respects, crowdsourced data and laboratory data show similar results within their own category, but that at the same time a statistical comparison between the two measurement configurations is difficult due to the significant amount of noisy (outlier) data in the crowdsourced case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信