高管薪酬绩效敏感性和强制性上限

Ziyang Li, Di Qi, Mengwei Zhang, Yingyue Zhang
{"title":"高管薪酬绩效敏感性和强制性上限","authors":"Ziyang Li, Di Qi, Mengwei Zhang, Yingyue Zhang","doi":"10.1109/ICIM49319.2020.244686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2009 and 2015, during the reform of state-owned enterprises, Chinese government introduced mandatory upper limits of executive compensation to resound to public outrage of excessive executive compensation. However, the limits were cancelled in 2018. Using Difference in Difference method, this paper empirically examines the changes of executive payperformance sensitivity after the cancellation of mandatory upper limits in 2018 for the first time. The results provide evidences that after the cancellation, executive payperformance sensitivity increases and moreover, the stronger ability the executive has, the more executive pay-performance sensitivity increases. It suggests that direct government intervention on executive compensation restricts large payoffs for exceptional performance and thus weakens incentives provided by compensation packages. In the circumstances where managers are excellent, the negative effect of mandatory upper limits on incentives is more obvious. These findings provide theoretical and empirical support for the new round of reform of compensation system of state-owned enterprises in China and helps for the policy makers to reevaluate the rationale of setting a mandatory upper limit.","PeriodicalId":129517,"journal":{"name":"2020 6th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM)","volume":"132 1 Pt 2 Su 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Executive Pay-performance Sensitivity and Mandatory Upper Limits\",\"authors\":\"Ziyang Li, Di Qi, Mengwei Zhang, Yingyue Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIM49319.2020.244686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2009 and 2015, during the reform of state-owned enterprises, Chinese government introduced mandatory upper limits of executive compensation to resound to public outrage of excessive executive compensation. However, the limits were cancelled in 2018. Using Difference in Difference method, this paper empirically examines the changes of executive payperformance sensitivity after the cancellation of mandatory upper limits in 2018 for the first time. The results provide evidences that after the cancellation, executive payperformance sensitivity increases and moreover, the stronger ability the executive has, the more executive pay-performance sensitivity increases. It suggests that direct government intervention on executive compensation restricts large payoffs for exceptional performance and thus weakens incentives provided by compensation packages. In the circumstances where managers are excellent, the negative effect of mandatory upper limits on incentives is more obvious. These findings provide theoretical and empirical support for the new round of reform of compensation system of state-owned enterprises in China and helps for the policy makers to reevaluate the rationale of setting a mandatory upper limit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 6th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM)\",\"volume\":\"132 1 Pt 2 Su 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 6th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIM49319.2020.244686\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 6th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIM49319.2020.244686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2009年和2015年的国企改革中,中国政府引入了高管薪酬的强制性上限,以回应公众对高管薪酬过高的愤怒。然而,这些限制在2018年被取消。本文运用差中之差方法,实证考察了2018年首次取消强制性上限后高管薪酬绩效敏感性的变化。研究结果表明,取消高管薪酬制度后,高管薪酬绩效敏感性增加,且高管能力越强,高管薪酬绩效敏感性增加越大。它表明,政府对高管薪酬的直接干预限制了对卓越业绩的大额支付,从而削弱了薪酬方案提供的激励。在管理者优秀的情况下,强制性上限对激励的负面影响更为明显。这些发现为中国新一轮国有企业薪酬制度改革提供了理论和实证支持,也有助于决策者重新评估设定强制性薪酬上限的合理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Executive Pay-performance Sensitivity and Mandatory Upper Limits
In 2009 and 2015, during the reform of state-owned enterprises, Chinese government introduced mandatory upper limits of executive compensation to resound to public outrage of excessive executive compensation. However, the limits were cancelled in 2018. Using Difference in Difference method, this paper empirically examines the changes of executive payperformance sensitivity after the cancellation of mandatory upper limits in 2018 for the first time. The results provide evidences that after the cancellation, executive payperformance sensitivity increases and moreover, the stronger ability the executive has, the more executive pay-performance sensitivity increases. It suggests that direct government intervention on executive compensation restricts large payoffs for exceptional performance and thus weakens incentives provided by compensation packages. In the circumstances where managers are excellent, the negative effect of mandatory upper limits on incentives is more obvious. These findings provide theoretical and empirical support for the new round of reform of compensation system of state-owned enterprises in China and helps for the policy makers to reevaluate the rationale of setting a mandatory upper limit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信