{"title":"假体周围骨折的手术选择","authors":"D. Popescu, R. Nedelcu, Şt. Trifu, C. Cirstoiu","doi":"10.2478/rojost-2018-0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose. The periprosthetic fractures are a more and more often encountered type of pathology, in which the main problem is the indication for surgery. The most important thing is the choice of the best therapeutic option in order to get a solid fixation of the fracture and, in the end, to allow an early patient’s mobilization. Materials and method. 38 cases of periprosthetic fractures have been treated in the Orthopedics and Traumatology Department of University Emergency Hospital in Bucharest, between 2010 and 2016. International Vancouver classification was used for all cases. The osteosynthesis saving the femoral stem was preferred in 22 cases, as its stability was not affected. Stem revision was performed in 16 cases, as this was unstable due to the fracture. Acetabular component was also revised in 4 cases, as the PE insert presented severe wear. The patients were aged 52 to 84 years old and sex ratio M/ F = 13/ 25. Osteosynthesis was performed using Dall-Miles plates and molded plates, with braided cables or wire cerclage. Long stems, uncemented with or without distal locking, were used in 16 cases. Results. Postoperatively, the bone repair was efficient regarding the stability in most of the cases. The patients’ mobilization was early in most of the cases, except for the very old patients with associated comorbidities and limited biological resources. Conclusions. An appropriate surgical indication, adapted on each type of peri-implant fracture, leads to a good result, with early mobilization and the best consolidation of the fracture.","PeriodicalId":122325,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical Options in Periprosthetic Fractures\",\"authors\":\"D. Popescu, R. Nedelcu, Şt. Trifu, C. Cirstoiu\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/rojost-2018-0032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Purpose. The periprosthetic fractures are a more and more often encountered type of pathology, in which the main problem is the indication for surgery. The most important thing is the choice of the best therapeutic option in order to get a solid fixation of the fracture and, in the end, to allow an early patient’s mobilization. Materials and method. 38 cases of periprosthetic fractures have been treated in the Orthopedics and Traumatology Department of University Emergency Hospital in Bucharest, between 2010 and 2016. International Vancouver classification was used for all cases. The osteosynthesis saving the femoral stem was preferred in 22 cases, as its stability was not affected. Stem revision was performed in 16 cases, as this was unstable due to the fracture. Acetabular component was also revised in 4 cases, as the PE insert presented severe wear. The patients were aged 52 to 84 years old and sex ratio M/ F = 13/ 25. Osteosynthesis was performed using Dall-Miles plates and molded plates, with braided cables or wire cerclage. Long stems, uncemented with or without distal locking, were used in 16 cases. Results. Postoperatively, the bone repair was efficient regarding the stability in most of the cases. The patients’ mobilization was early in most of the cases, except for the very old patients with associated comorbidities and limited biological resources. Conclusions. An appropriate surgical indication, adapted on each type of peri-implant fracture, leads to a good result, with early mobilization and the best consolidation of the fracture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":122325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Romanian Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Romanian Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/rojost-2018-0032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/rojost-2018-0032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
抽象的目的。假体周围骨折是一种越来越常见的病理类型,其中主要的问题是手术指征。最重要的是选择最好的治疗方案,以获得骨折的牢固固定,并最终允许患者早期活动。材料和方法。2010年至2016年,布加勒斯特大学急救医院骨科和创伤科治疗了38例假体周围骨折。所有病例均采用国际温哥华分类。22例首选保留股骨干的植骨术,因为其稳定性不受影响。16例患者因骨折不稳定,进行了骨干修复。由于PE内嵌物磨损严重,4例髋臼假体也进行了翻修。患者年龄52 ~ 84岁,性别比M/ F = 13/ 25。采用Dall-Miles钢板和模塑钢板进行骨固定,并用编织电缆或钢丝环扎。16例采用长柄,不加骨水泥,带或不带远端锁定。结果。术后骨修复效果良好,稳定性良好。大多数病例患者活动较早,但有相关合并症和生物资源有限的高龄患者除外。结论。针对每种类型的种植体周围骨折,采用合适的手术指征,可获得良好的结果,并可实现早期活动和骨折的最佳巩固。
Abstract Purpose. The periprosthetic fractures are a more and more often encountered type of pathology, in which the main problem is the indication for surgery. The most important thing is the choice of the best therapeutic option in order to get a solid fixation of the fracture and, in the end, to allow an early patient’s mobilization. Materials and method. 38 cases of periprosthetic fractures have been treated in the Orthopedics and Traumatology Department of University Emergency Hospital in Bucharest, between 2010 and 2016. International Vancouver classification was used for all cases. The osteosynthesis saving the femoral stem was preferred in 22 cases, as its stability was not affected. Stem revision was performed in 16 cases, as this was unstable due to the fracture. Acetabular component was also revised in 4 cases, as the PE insert presented severe wear. The patients were aged 52 to 84 years old and sex ratio M/ F = 13/ 25. Osteosynthesis was performed using Dall-Miles plates and molded plates, with braided cables or wire cerclage. Long stems, uncemented with or without distal locking, were used in 16 cases. Results. Postoperatively, the bone repair was efficient regarding the stability in most of the cases. The patients’ mobilization was early in most of the cases, except for the very old patients with associated comorbidities and limited biological resources. Conclusions. An appropriate surgical indication, adapted on each type of peri-implant fracture, leads to a good result, with early mobilization and the best consolidation of the fracture.