使用经处理的再生骨料的再生骨料混凝土性能研究

Malathy Ramalingam, Jagan Sivamani, Karuppasamy Narayanan
{"title":"使用经处理的再生骨料的再生骨料混凝土性能研究","authors":"Malathy Ramalingam,&nbsp;Jagan Sivamani,&nbsp;Karuppasamy Narayanan","doi":"10.1007/s42768-023-00157-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Excessive construction activities generate huge quantities of waste that are disposed of in nearby sites, leading to environmental degradation. Recycling the concrete fractions of construction wastes for their utilization as aggregates has been predominant among industrialists and researchers in recent years. However, the smearance of cement mortar on the recycled aggregates affects the concrete properties. Fewer treatments were developed to remove the weak cement mortar or seal the micro-pores on the adhered cement mortar of recycled aggregates. This paper investigates the comparative efficiency of acid and carbonation treatment on recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) properties and its behaviour on recycled aggregate concrete (RAC). The RCA was treated with HCl acid at 0.1 mol/L, 0.5 mol/L, and 0.8 mol/L and CO<sub>2</sub> at 0.1 bar, 0.2 bar, and 0.4 bar and tested for their physical properties, and the concrete mixtures with treated recycled aggregates were tested for fresh and hardened properties. It could be observed that the properties of RAC were affected owing to the smearance of weak mortar, whereas for the concrete with carbonated (RACc) and chemically treated aggregates (RACa), the concrete properties tended to improve. The strength of RAC was 28.59% less than that of normal aggregate concrete (NAC), whereas the strength of RACc and RACa was enhanced by 16.44% and 9.7% compared to that of RAC at 28 days. The water absorption of RAC was 47.51% more than that of NAC, whereas the water absorption of RACa and RACc was 28.67% and 33.75% lesser than RAC. Pre-soaking the RCA with acids removes the adhered mortar due to its acidic activity. In contrast, in carbonation, the CO<sub>2</sub> reacts with the Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> on the cement mortar to form CaCO<sub>3,</sub> filling the micro-cracks in the cement mortar on the RCA.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":807,"journal":{"name":"Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy","volume":"5 4","pages":"451 - 459"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance studies on recycled aggregate concrete with treated recycled aggregates\",\"authors\":\"Malathy Ramalingam,&nbsp;Jagan Sivamani,&nbsp;Karuppasamy Narayanan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42768-023-00157-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Excessive construction activities generate huge quantities of waste that are disposed of in nearby sites, leading to environmental degradation. Recycling the concrete fractions of construction wastes for their utilization as aggregates has been predominant among industrialists and researchers in recent years. However, the smearance of cement mortar on the recycled aggregates affects the concrete properties. Fewer treatments were developed to remove the weak cement mortar or seal the micro-pores on the adhered cement mortar of recycled aggregates. This paper investigates the comparative efficiency of acid and carbonation treatment on recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) properties and its behaviour on recycled aggregate concrete (RAC). The RCA was treated with HCl acid at 0.1 mol/L, 0.5 mol/L, and 0.8 mol/L and CO<sub>2</sub> at 0.1 bar, 0.2 bar, and 0.4 bar and tested for their physical properties, and the concrete mixtures with treated recycled aggregates were tested for fresh and hardened properties. It could be observed that the properties of RAC were affected owing to the smearance of weak mortar, whereas for the concrete with carbonated (RACc) and chemically treated aggregates (RACa), the concrete properties tended to improve. The strength of RAC was 28.59% less than that of normal aggregate concrete (NAC), whereas the strength of RACc and RACa was enhanced by 16.44% and 9.7% compared to that of RAC at 28 days. The water absorption of RAC was 47.51% more than that of NAC, whereas the water absorption of RACa and RACc was 28.67% and 33.75% lesser than RAC. Pre-soaking the RCA with acids removes the adhered mortar due to its acidic activity. In contrast, in carbonation, the CO<sub>2</sub> reacts with the Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> on the cement mortar to form CaCO<sub>3,</sub> filling the micro-cracks in the cement mortar on the RCA.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"451 - 459\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"6\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42768-023-00157-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42768-023-00157-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过度的建筑活动会产生大量垃圾,这些垃圾被丢弃到附近的工地,导致环境恶化。近年来,回收利用建筑垃圾中的混凝土部分作为骨料已成为工业家和研究人员的主要做法。然而,水泥砂浆在再生骨料上的涂抹会影响混凝土的性能。目前,很少有处理方法可以去除再生骨料上粘附的薄弱水泥砂浆或封闭水泥砂浆上的微孔。本文研究了酸处理和碳化处理对再生粗骨料(RCA)性能的比较效率及其在再生骨料混凝土(RAC)中的表现。分别用 0.1 摩尔/升、0.5 摩尔/升和 0.8 摩尔/升的盐酸和 0.1 巴、0.2 巴和 0.4 巴的二氧化碳处理回收粗骨料,并测试其物理性能,同时测试经处理的回收骨料混凝土混合物的新拌和硬化性能。可以看出,由于弱砂浆的涂抹作用,RAC 的性能受到了影响,而使用碳化骨料(RACc)和化学处理骨料(RACa)的混凝土性能则趋于改善。28 天时,RAC 的强度比普通骨料混凝土(NAC)低 28.59%,而 RACc 和 RACa 的强度分别比 RAC 提高了 16.44% 和 9.7%。RAC 的吸水率比 NAC 高 47.51%,而 RACa 和 RACc 的吸水率分别比 RAC 低 28.67% 和 33.75%。由于 RAC 具有酸性活性,用酸预先浸泡 RCA 可以去除附着的灰泥。相反,在碳化过程中,二氧化碳与水泥砂浆上的 Ca(OH)2 反应生成 CaCO3,填充了 RCA 上水泥砂浆的微裂缝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Performance studies on recycled aggregate concrete with treated recycled aggregates

Performance studies on recycled aggregate concrete with treated recycled aggregates

Excessive construction activities generate huge quantities of waste that are disposed of in nearby sites, leading to environmental degradation. Recycling the concrete fractions of construction wastes for their utilization as aggregates has been predominant among industrialists and researchers in recent years. However, the smearance of cement mortar on the recycled aggregates affects the concrete properties. Fewer treatments were developed to remove the weak cement mortar or seal the micro-pores on the adhered cement mortar of recycled aggregates. This paper investigates the comparative efficiency of acid and carbonation treatment on recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) properties and its behaviour on recycled aggregate concrete (RAC). The RCA was treated with HCl acid at 0.1 mol/L, 0.5 mol/L, and 0.8 mol/L and CO2 at 0.1 bar, 0.2 bar, and 0.4 bar and tested for their physical properties, and the concrete mixtures with treated recycled aggregates were tested for fresh and hardened properties. It could be observed that the properties of RAC were affected owing to the smearance of weak mortar, whereas for the concrete with carbonated (RACc) and chemically treated aggregates (RACa), the concrete properties tended to improve. The strength of RAC was 28.59% less than that of normal aggregate concrete (NAC), whereas the strength of RACc and RACa was enhanced by 16.44% and 9.7% compared to that of RAC at 28 days. The water absorption of RAC was 47.51% more than that of NAC, whereas the water absorption of RACa and RACc was 28.67% and 33.75% lesser than RAC. Pre-soaking the RCA with acids removes the adhered mortar due to its acidic activity. In contrast, in carbonation, the CO2 reacts with the Ca(OH)2 on the cement mortar to form CaCO3, filling the micro-cracks in the cement mortar on the RCA.

Graphical abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信