以科技为基础的科学素养在提高学生科学学习中批判性思维能力的实施

Rismawati Lubis, Rosmawaty, S. Listyarini
{"title":"以科技为基础的科学素养在提高学生科学学习中批判性思维能力的实施","authors":"Rismawati Lubis, Rosmawaty, S. Listyarini","doi":"10.53768/SIJEL.V1I2.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This type of research is descriptive qualitative. The purpose of this study was to analyze the application of technology-based scientific literacy in improving students' critical thinking skills in science learning at SD 04 Rantauprapat. Objects were obtained by purposive sampling. The object in this study was taken as many as 56 for respondents, namely fourth grade students of SD Negeri 04 Rantauprapat, namely Class IVA totaling 28 students and Class IVB totaling 28 students for a questionnaire of students critical thinking abilities. The ability to think critically of students in this case includes Reason, Situation, Clarity, Overview, and Inference with the acquisition of technology-based scientific literacy in science learning at SD 04 Rantauprapat, namely: student frequency those who think that the Reason aspect is above an average of 48 students or 92.9%; the frequency of students who think the Situation aspect is above the average of 46 students or 82.1%; the frequency of students who think that the clarity aspect is above the average is 46 students or 82.1%; the frequency of students who think about the Aspects of Examination (Overview) is above the average of 34 students or 60.7%; and the frequency of students who think inference (Inference) above the average is 34 students or 60.7%. Based on the analysis of students 'scientific literacy abilities made in written tests and interviews, it can be seen how the students abilities in solving science questions. The results are as follows. a) almost all students' science content is still low, this means that most students do not understand the concept of science, b) recognize scientific questions, there are no errors for all students, c) in identifying scientific evidence and phenomena, all students are able to read the data provided, d) in drawing conclusions, almost all students are able to do well, e) in communicating conclusions, almost all students are able to do it well, f) almost all students show understanding of concepts, g) in science applications, almost all students are able to apply them well","PeriodicalId":430876,"journal":{"name":"Sensei International Journal of Education and Linguistic","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IMPLEMENTATION OF TECHNOLOGY BASED SCIENCE LITERATION IN IMPROVING STUDENT'S CRITICAL THINKING ABILITY ON SCIENCE LEARNING AT SD 04 RANTAUPRAPAT LABUHANBATU DISTRICT\",\"authors\":\"Rismawati Lubis, Rosmawaty, S. Listyarini\",\"doi\":\"10.53768/SIJEL.V1I2.36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This type of research is descriptive qualitative. The purpose of this study was to analyze the application of technology-based scientific literacy in improving students' critical thinking skills in science learning at SD 04 Rantauprapat. Objects were obtained by purposive sampling. The object in this study was taken as many as 56 for respondents, namely fourth grade students of SD Negeri 04 Rantauprapat, namely Class IVA totaling 28 students and Class IVB totaling 28 students for a questionnaire of students critical thinking abilities. The ability to think critically of students in this case includes Reason, Situation, Clarity, Overview, and Inference with the acquisition of technology-based scientific literacy in science learning at SD 04 Rantauprapat, namely: student frequency those who think that the Reason aspect is above an average of 48 students or 92.9%; the frequency of students who think the Situation aspect is above the average of 46 students or 82.1%; the frequency of students who think that the clarity aspect is above the average is 46 students or 82.1%; the frequency of students who think about the Aspects of Examination (Overview) is above the average of 34 students or 60.7%; and the frequency of students who think inference (Inference) above the average is 34 students or 60.7%. Based on the analysis of students 'scientific literacy abilities made in written tests and interviews, it can be seen how the students abilities in solving science questions. The results are as follows. a) almost all students' science content is still low, this means that most students do not understand the concept of science, b) recognize scientific questions, there are no errors for all students, c) in identifying scientific evidence and phenomena, all students are able to read the data provided, d) in drawing conclusions, almost all students are able to do well, e) in communicating conclusions, almost all students are able to do it well, f) almost all students show understanding of concepts, g) in science applications, almost all students are able to apply them well\",\"PeriodicalId\":430876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sensei International Journal of Education and Linguistic\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sensei International Journal of Education and Linguistic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53768/SIJEL.V1I2.36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sensei International Journal of Education and Linguistic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53768/SIJEL.V1I2.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这种类型的研究是描述性质的。本研究的目的是分析基于技术的科学素养在Rantauprapat SD 04科学学习中提高学生批判性思维技能的应用。目的取样获得对象。本研究的调查对象为SD Negeri 04 Rantauprapat四年级学生,共56人,即IVA班共28人,IVB班共28人,进行学生批判性思维能力问卷调查。在本案例中,学生的批判性思维能力包括理性、情境、清晰、概述和推理,在科学学习中获得基于技术的科学素养,即:学生频率认为理性方面高于平均水平的48名学生或92.9%;认为“情况”方面的学生多于平均46人(82.1%);认为清晰度在平均水平以上的有46人,占82.1%;思考“考试方面(概述)”的学生频率高于平均水平34人,占60.7%;认为推理(inference)高于平均水平的学生有34人,占60.7%。通过对笔试和访谈中学生科学素养能力的分析,可以看出学生解决科学问题的能力。结果如下:A)几乎所有学生的科学内容仍然很低,这意味着大多数学生不理解科学的概念;b)认识科学问题,所有学生都没有错误;c)在识别科学证据和现象方面,所有学生都能阅读提供的数据;d)在得出结论方面,几乎所有学生都能做得很好;e)在传达结论方面,几乎所有学生都能做得很好。F)几乎所有的学生都能理解概念,g)在科学应用中,几乎所有的学生都能很好地应用它们
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
IMPLEMENTATION OF TECHNOLOGY BASED SCIENCE LITERATION IN IMPROVING STUDENT'S CRITICAL THINKING ABILITY ON SCIENCE LEARNING AT SD 04 RANTAUPRAPAT LABUHANBATU DISTRICT
This type of research is descriptive qualitative. The purpose of this study was to analyze the application of technology-based scientific literacy in improving students' critical thinking skills in science learning at SD 04 Rantauprapat. Objects were obtained by purposive sampling. The object in this study was taken as many as 56 for respondents, namely fourth grade students of SD Negeri 04 Rantauprapat, namely Class IVA totaling 28 students and Class IVB totaling 28 students for a questionnaire of students critical thinking abilities. The ability to think critically of students in this case includes Reason, Situation, Clarity, Overview, and Inference with the acquisition of technology-based scientific literacy in science learning at SD 04 Rantauprapat, namely: student frequency those who think that the Reason aspect is above an average of 48 students or 92.9%; the frequency of students who think the Situation aspect is above the average of 46 students or 82.1%; the frequency of students who think that the clarity aspect is above the average is 46 students or 82.1%; the frequency of students who think about the Aspects of Examination (Overview) is above the average of 34 students or 60.7%; and the frequency of students who think inference (Inference) above the average is 34 students or 60.7%. Based on the analysis of students 'scientific literacy abilities made in written tests and interviews, it can be seen how the students abilities in solving science questions. The results are as follows. a) almost all students' science content is still low, this means that most students do not understand the concept of science, b) recognize scientific questions, there are no errors for all students, c) in identifying scientific evidence and phenomena, all students are able to read the data provided, d) in drawing conclusions, almost all students are able to do well, e) in communicating conclusions, almost all students are able to do it well, f) almost all students show understanding of concepts, g) in science applications, almost all students are able to apply them well
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信