媒介艺术评论的性质与功能

Dwight DeWerth-Pallmeyer
{"title":"媒介艺术评论的性质与功能","authors":"Dwight DeWerth-Pallmeyer","doi":"10.1080/15456870309367440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An Internet survey of 56 media arts critics found numerous job tides are applied to individuals sharing the same role. Some are called reporters; others are critics, reviewers, columnists and editors. Accordingly, these critics have different views on what should be their roles. As job titles vary, the traditional dichotomy between objective reporting and subjective criticism is less clear. While critics believe they should have a significant impact on their readers, they believe they should have minimal impact on the media arts themselves. The author disagrees, arguing the best criticism should make a point that has an impact on both the audience and the media arts. Good critical writing often uses narrative to allow the critic to point to moral truths. Superior criticism addresses broad issues, oftentimes by microscopically examining the details of media texts. The best criticism helps construct a “cultural frame” for the media arts and for the readers.","PeriodicalId":113832,"journal":{"name":"New Jersey Journal of Communication","volume":"128 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The nature and function of the media arts critic\",\"authors\":\"Dwight DeWerth-Pallmeyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15456870309367440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An Internet survey of 56 media arts critics found numerous job tides are applied to individuals sharing the same role. Some are called reporters; others are critics, reviewers, columnists and editors. Accordingly, these critics have different views on what should be their roles. As job titles vary, the traditional dichotomy between objective reporting and subjective criticism is less clear. While critics believe they should have a significant impact on their readers, they believe they should have minimal impact on the media arts themselves. The author disagrees, arguing the best criticism should make a point that has an impact on both the audience and the media arts. Good critical writing often uses narrative to allow the critic to point to moral truths. Superior criticism addresses broad issues, oftentimes by microscopically examining the details of media texts. The best criticism helps construct a “cultural frame” for the media arts and for the readers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Jersey Journal of Communication\",\"volume\":\"128 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Jersey Journal of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870309367440\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Jersey Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870309367440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

一项针对56位媒体艺术评论家的网络调查发现,许多工作潮都适用于同一角色的个人。有些人被称为记者;其他人是评论家、评论家、专栏作家和编辑。因此,这些评论家对他们应该扮演的角色有不同的看法。随着职位头衔的变化,客观报道和主观批评之间的传统二分法变得不那么清晰了。虽然评论家认为它们应该对读者产生重大影响,但他们认为它们对媒体艺术本身的影响应该微乎其微。作者不同意,认为最好的批评应该提出一个观点,对观众和媒体艺术都有影响。好的批评文章经常使用叙事来让批评家指出道德真理。优秀的批评解决广泛的问题,通常通过微观检查媒体文本的细节。最好的批评有助于为媒体艺术和读者构建一个“文化框架”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The nature and function of the media arts critic
An Internet survey of 56 media arts critics found numerous job tides are applied to individuals sharing the same role. Some are called reporters; others are critics, reviewers, columnists and editors. Accordingly, these critics have different views on what should be their roles. As job titles vary, the traditional dichotomy between objective reporting and subjective criticism is less clear. While critics believe they should have a significant impact on their readers, they believe they should have minimal impact on the media arts themselves. The author disagrees, arguing the best criticism should make a point that has an impact on both the audience and the media arts. Good critical writing often uses narrative to allow the critic to point to moral truths. Superior criticism addresses broad issues, oftentimes by microscopically examining the details of media texts. The best criticism helps construct a “cultural frame” for the media arts and for the readers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信