巴西民事诉讼中预先监护的稳定:初步评估

Alexandre de Castro Catharina
{"title":"巴西民事诉讼中预先监护的稳定:初步评估","authors":"Alexandre de Castro Catharina","doi":"10.5585/rtj.v9i1.16784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The stabilization of provisional custody is one of the main bets of the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure to achieve the effectiveness of jurisdiction in the cognitive phase. In this sense, it is necessary to reflect on the adequacy of the treatment given to the theme by the procedural legislator and, especially, if the normative innovation has been producing practical effects on the dynamics of judicial activity. Based on this premise, the main objective of the paper is to take stock of the stabilization of provisional custody in the CPC, at first, and to verify if the proposed legislative innovation had impacts on the practice of the main courts of the country. The methodology used in the work is qualitative documentary, with emphasis on the analysis of some court decisions, articulated with bibliographic survey.","PeriodicalId":425034,"journal":{"name":"Revista Thesis Juris","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estabilização da tutela antecipada antecedente no processo civil brasileiro: um primeiro balanço\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre de Castro Catharina\",\"doi\":\"10.5585/rtj.v9i1.16784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The stabilization of provisional custody is one of the main bets of the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure to achieve the effectiveness of jurisdiction in the cognitive phase. In this sense, it is necessary to reflect on the adequacy of the treatment given to the theme by the procedural legislator and, especially, if the normative innovation has been producing practical effects on the dynamics of judicial activity. Based on this premise, the main objective of the paper is to take stock of the stabilization of provisional custody in the CPC, at first, and to verify if the proposed legislative innovation had impacts on the practice of the main courts of the country. The methodology used in the work is qualitative documentary, with emphasis on the analysis of some court decisions, articulated with bibliographic survey.\",\"PeriodicalId\":425034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Thesis Juris\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Thesis Juris\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5585/rtj.v9i1.16784\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Thesis Juris","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5585/rtj.v9i1.16784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临时羁押的稳定化是2015年《民事诉讼法》在认知阶段实现管辖有效性的主要押注之一。从这个意义上说,有必要反思程序立法者对这一主题的处理是否适当,特别是如果规范创新对司法活动的动态产生了实际影响。在此前提下,本文的主要目的是首先对中国最高法院临时羁押制度的稳定化进行评估,并验证拟议的立法创新是否对我国主要法院的实践产生了影响。工作中使用的方法是定性纪录片,重点是对一些法院判决的分析,与书目调查相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estabilização da tutela antecipada antecedente no processo civil brasileiro: um primeiro balanço
The stabilization of provisional custody is one of the main bets of the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure to achieve the effectiveness of jurisdiction in the cognitive phase. In this sense, it is necessary to reflect on the adequacy of the treatment given to the theme by the procedural legislator and, especially, if the normative innovation has been producing practical effects on the dynamics of judicial activity. Based on this premise, the main objective of the paper is to take stock of the stabilization of provisional custody in the CPC, at first, and to verify if the proposed legislative innovation had impacts on the practice of the main courts of the country. The methodology used in the work is qualitative documentary, with emphasis on the analysis of some court decisions, articulated with bibliographic survey.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信