{"title":"巴西民事诉讼中预先监护的稳定:初步评估","authors":"Alexandre de Castro Catharina","doi":"10.5585/rtj.v9i1.16784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The stabilization of provisional custody is one of the main bets of the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure to achieve the effectiveness of jurisdiction in the cognitive phase. In this sense, it is necessary to reflect on the adequacy of the treatment given to the theme by the procedural legislator and, especially, if the normative innovation has been producing practical effects on the dynamics of judicial activity. Based on this premise, the main objective of the paper is to take stock of the stabilization of provisional custody in the CPC, at first, and to verify if the proposed legislative innovation had impacts on the practice of the main courts of the country. The methodology used in the work is qualitative documentary, with emphasis on the analysis of some court decisions, articulated with bibliographic survey.","PeriodicalId":425034,"journal":{"name":"Revista Thesis Juris","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estabilização da tutela antecipada antecedente no processo civil brasileiro: um primeiro balanço\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre de Castro Catharina\",\"doi\":\"10.5585/rtj.v9i1.16784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The stabilization of provisional custody is one of the main bets of the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure to achieve the effectiveness of jurisdiction in the cognitive phase. In this sense, it is necessary to reflect on the adequacy of the treatment given to the theme by the procedural legislator and, especially, if the normative innovation has been producing practical effects on the dynamics of judicial activity. Based on this premise, the main objective of the paper is to take stock of the stabilization of provisional custody in the CPC, at first, and to verify if the proposed legislative innovation had impacts on the practice of the main courts of the country. The methodology used in the work is qualitative documentary, with emphasis on the analysis of some court decisions, articulated with bibliographic survey.\",\"PeriodicalId\":425034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Thesis Juris\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Thesis Juris\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5585/rtj.v9i1.16784\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Thesis Juris","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5585/rtj.v9i1.16784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Estabilização da tutela antecipada antecedente no processo civil brasileiro: um primeiro balanço
The stabilization of provisional custody is one of the main bets of the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure to achieve the effectiveness of jurisdiction in the cognitive phase. In this sense, it is necessary to reflect on the adequacy of the treatment given to the theme by the procedural legislator and, especially, if the normative innovation has been producing practical effects on the dynamics of judicial activity. Based on this premise, the main objective of the paper is to take stock of the stabilization of provisional custody in the CPC, at first, and to verify if the proposed legislative innovation had impacts on the practice of the main courts of the country. The methodology used in the work is qualitative documentary, with emphasis on the analysis of some court decisions, articulated with bibliographic survey.