取消大交易:三个R1库比较数据,通信和策略

L. Ohler, Leigh Ann DePope, Karen Rupp-Serrano, Joelle Pitts
{"title":"取消大交易:三个R1库比较数据,通信和策略","authors":"L. Ohler, Leigh Ann DePope, Karen Rupp-Serrano, Joelle Pitts","doi":"10.5703/1288284317171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Canceling the Big Deal is becoming more common, but there are still many\n unanswered questions about the impact of this change and the fundamental shift in the\n library collections model that it represents. Institutions like Southern Illinois\n University Carbondale and the University of Oregon were some of the first institutions\n to have written about their own experience with canceling the Big Deal several years\n ago, but are those experiences the norm in terms of changes in budgets, collection\n development, and interlibrary loan activity? Within the context of the University of\n California system’s move to cancel a system-wide contract with Elsevier, how are\n libraries managing the communication about Big Deals both internally with library\n personnel as well as externally with campus stakeholders? Three R1 libraries (University\n of Maryland, University of Oklahoma, and Kansas State University) will compare their\n data, discuss both internal and external communication strategies, and examine the\n impact these decisions have had on their collections in terms of interlibrary loan and\n collection development strategies. The results of a brief survey measuring the status of\n the audience members with respect to Big Deals, communication efforts with campus\n stakeholders, and impacts on collections will also be discussed.","PeriodicalId":287918,"journal":{"name":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\"","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Canceling the Big Deal: Three R1 Libraries Compare Data, Communication, and\\n Strategies\",\"authors\":\"L. Ohler, Leigh Ann DePope, Karen Rupp-Serrano, Joelle Pitts\",\"doi\":\"10.5703/1288284317171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Canceling the Big Deal is becoming more common, but there are still many\\n unanswered questions about the impact of this change and the fundamental shift in the\\n library collections model that it represents. Institutions like Southern Illinois\\n University Carbondale and the University of Oregon were some of the first institutions\\n to have written about their own experience with canceling the Big Deal several years\\n ago, but are those experiences the norm in terms of changes in budgets, collection\\n development, and interlibrary loan activity? Within the context of the University of\\n California system’s move to cancel a system-wide contract with Elsevier, how are\\n libraries managing the communication about Big Deals both internally with library\\n personnel as well as externally with campus stakeholders? Three R1 libraries (University\\n of Maryland, University of Oklahoma, and Kansas State University) will compare their\\n data, discuss both internal and external communication strategies, and examine the\\n impact these decisions have had on their collections in terms of interlibrary loan and\\n collection development strategies. The results of a brief survey measuring the status of\\n the audience members with respect to Big Deals, communication efforts with campus\\n stakeholders, and impacts on collections will also be discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\\\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\\\"\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\\\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\\\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

取消“大交易”正变得越来越普遍,但关于这一变化的影响,以及它所代表的图书馆馆藏模式的根本转变,仍有许多悬而未决的问题。像南伊利诺伊大学卡本代尔分校和俄勒冈大学这样的机构是几年前第一批写下他们自己取消“大交易”的经历的机构,但是这些经历在预算、馆藏发展和馆际互借活动方面的变化是常态吗?在加州大学系统取消与爱思唯尔的全系统合同的背景下,图书馆如何管理内部与图书馆人员以及外部与校园利益相关者的大交易沟通?三家R1图书馆(马里兰大学、俄克拉何马大学和堪萨斯州立大学)将比较它们的数据,讨论内部和外部沟通策略,并从馆际互借和馆藏发展策略的角度审视这些决策对它们的馆藏的影响。本文还将讨论一项简短调查的结果,该调查测量了观众在大交易、与校园利益相关者的沟通努力以及对收藏的影响方面的状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Canceling the Big Deal: Three R1 Libraries Compare Data, Communication, and Strategies
Canceling the Big Deal is becoming more common, but there are still many unanswered questions about the impact of this change and the fundamental shift in the library collections model that it represents. Institutions like Southern Illinois University Carbondale and the University of Oregon were some of the first institutions to have written about their own experience with canceling the Big Deal several years ago, but are those experiences the norm in terms of changes in budgets, collection development, and interlibrary loan activity? Within the context of the University of California system’s move to cancel a system-wide contract with Elsevier, how are libraries managing the communication about Big Deals both internally with library personnel as well as externally with campus stakeholders? Three R1 libraries (University of Maryland, University of Oklahoma, and Kansas State University) will compare their data, discuss both internal and external communication strategies, and examine the impact these decisions have had on their collections in terms of interlibrary loan and collection development strategies. The results of a brief survey measuring the status of the audience members with respect to Big Deals, communication efforts with campus stakeholders, and impacts on collections will also be discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信