{"title":"استحسان :تعارف،تاریخی ارتقاءاورمصدری نوعیت (تحقیقی جائزہ)","authors":"Muhammad Atiq ur Rehman Khan, J. Khan","doi":"10.51665/al-duhaa.001.02.0060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid advancements in today’s world necessitate to look into the underlying sources of Sharia laws in a manner that helps to find out solutions to our everyday matters raised in the modern world. In addition, it should also assist the nation to avail the privileges Islam has provided on the contemporary issues.It is seen that scholars refer to the Quran, Sunnah, Ijma and Qiyas, when they are asked about any modern issue. However, when two or more statements are found about any current world affair, then whose statement will be given preference? At times confusion is created on this matter. Due to this, some elements reject the jurisprudent source ‘Istihsan’ blaming Ulema e Ahnaf as ‘Ahle Raey’ – those whose develop their personal perceptions on Quran and Hadith. And sometimes they negate its legitimacy as the source of Sharia Law.It is true that cores in the Islamic law are limited. However, an extensive law of ‘Istihsan’ is there for their further elaborations, whose endorsement can be sought in the Quran, Sunnah and statements of Imams and Jurists. Hence, this article will deal with the legitimacy of Istihsan, its historical development and its status as a source of law. Moreover, the article will further present answers to the orientalists and Ulema in this concern. So that confusion of some mindsets regarding sources of law can be removed and rectified.","PeriodicalId":134412,"journal":{"name":"Al-Duhaa","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"استحسان :تعارف،تاریخی ارتقاءاورمصدری نوعیت (تحقیقی جائزہ)\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Atiq ur Rehman Khan, J. Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.51665/al-duhaa.001.02.0060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rapid advancements in today’s world necessitate to look into the underlying sources of Sharia laws in a manner that helps to find out solutions to our everyday matters raised in the modern world. In addition, it should also assist the nation to avail the privileges Islam has provided on the contemporary issues.It is seen that scholars refer to the Quran, Sunnah, Ijma and Qiyas, when they are asked about any modern issue. However, when two or more statements are found about any current world affair, then whose statement will be given preference? At times confusion is created on this matter. Due to this, some elements reject the jurisprudent source ‘Istihsan’ blaming Ulema e Ahnaf as ‘Ahle Raey’ – those whose develop their personal perceptions on Quran and Hadith. And sometimes they negate its legitimacy as the source of Sharia Law.It is true that cores in the Islamic law are limited. However, an extensive law of ‘Istihsan’ is there for their further elaborations, whose endorsement can be sought in the Quran, Sunnah and statements of Imams and Jurists. Hence, this article will deal with the legitimacy of Istihsan, its historical development and its status as a source of law. Moreover, the article will further present answers to the orientalists and Ulema in this concern. So that confusion of some mindsets regarding sources of law can be removed and rectified.\",\"PeriodicalId\":134412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Duhaa\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Duhaa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51665/al-duhaa.001.02.0060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Duhaa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51665/al-duhaa.001.02.0060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
当今世界的快速发展需要以一种有助于找到解决现代世界中提出的日常问题的方法的方式来研究伊斯兰教法的潜在来源。此外,它还应帮助国家利用伊斯兰教在当代问题上提供的特权。可以看出,学者们在被问及任何现代问题时,都会参考《古兰经》、《圣训》、《伊玛》和《齐雅》。然而,当发现两种或两种以上关于任何时事的陈述时,那么哪一种陈述将被优先考虑?在这个问题上有时会产生混乱。由于这个原因,一些人拒绝法理来源“Istihsan”,指责Ulema e Ahnaf是“Ahle Raey”-那些发展他们对古兰经和圣训的个人看法的人。有时他们会否定伊斯兰教法的合法性。伊斯兰教法中的核心是有限的,这是事实。然而,一个广泛的“Istihsan”的法律在那里为他们的进一步阐述,其背书可以在古兰经,圣训和伊玛目和法学家的声明中寻求。因此,本文将讨论Istihsan的合法性,其历史发展及其作为法律渊源的地位。此外,本文将进一步回答东方主义者和乌里玛在这方面的问题。这样就可以消除和纠正一些关于法律渊源的思维混乱。
The rapid advancements in today’s world necessitate to look into the underlying sources of Sharia laws in a manner that helps to find out solutions to our everyday matters raised in the modern world. In addition, it should also assist the nation to avail the privileges Islam has provided on the contemporary issues.It is seen that scholars refer to the Quran, Sunnah, Ijma and Qiyas, when they are asked about any modern issue. However, when two or more statements are found about any current world affair, then whose statement will be given preference? At times confusion is created on this matter. Due to this, some elements reject the jurisprudent source ‘Istihsan’ blaming Ulema e Ahnaf as ‘Ahle Raey’ – those whose develop their personal perceptions on Quran and Hadith. And sometimes they negate its legitimacy as the source of Sharia Law.It is true that cores in the Islamic law are limited. However, an extensive law of ‘Istihsan’ is there for their further elaborations, whose endorsement can be sought in the Quran, Sunnah and statements of Imams and Jurists. Hence, this article will deal with the legitimacy of Istihsan, its historical development and its status as a source of law. Moreover, the article will further present answers to the orientalists and Ulema in this concern. So that confusion of some mindsets regarding sources of law can be removed and rectified.