已婚妇女对宫颈癌筛查试验的看法:一项基于理论的定性研究

Mona Khalednejad, L. Salehi, Sara Pashang, A. Moghimbeigi, Atefeh Nezhadmohammad Nameghi
{"title":"已婚妇女对宫颈癌筛查试验的看法:一项基于理论的定性研究","authors":"Mona Khalednejad, L. Salehi, Sara Pashang, A. Moghimbeigi, Atefeh Nezhadmohammad Nameghi","doi":"10.2174/1573404818666220304104128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nCervical cancer (CC) is one of the treatable forms of cancer which can be prevented in terms of its long precancerous conditions and good screening programs.\n\n\n\nUsing directed content analysis, the present study, as qualitative research, aimed to investigate married women’s perspectives on screening for CC based on the protection motivation theory (PMT).\n\n\n\nTo this end, a total number of 20 married women, considering maximum variation in sampling in terms of age and level of education, were interviewed. Therefore, an in-depth semi-structured interview was used for data collection until saturation was reached. As well, the PMT was applied as the main framework to develop the interview items.\n\n\n\nEight categories, namely, intention, fear, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, response efficacy, self-efficacy, response cost, and social support, were identified based on data classification. \nThe majority of the participants intended to have a Pap smear. Moreover, they believed that if women knew more about screening for cervical cancer, they would definitely do so. Most of participants 60% had a high level of perceived susceptibility and 100% of them had self-efficacy related to doing a Pap smear. Almost all the interviewees acknowledged the effectiveness of a Pap smear and its consequences but 80% of the participants reported that they could not follow regular tests due to response cost despite their self-efficacy and knowledge about the effectiveness and the benefits of this type of screening. All the study participants also put more emphasis on the role of social support to push them to get a Pap smear.\n\n\n\nResponse cost and social support should be considered factors encouraging married women to do a Pap smear during screening programs.\n","PeriodicalId":371340,"journal":{"name":"Current Womens Health Reviews","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives of Married Women Related to Cervical Cancer Screening Test: A Theory Based Qualitative Study in Iran\",\"authors\":\"Mona Khalednejad, L. Salehi, Sara Pashang, A. Moghimbeigi, Atefeh Nezhadmohammad Nameghi\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1573404818666220304104128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nCervical cancer (CC) is one of the treatable forms of cancer which can be prevented in terms of its long precancerous conditions and good screening programs.\\n\\n\\n\\nUsing directed content analysis, the present study, as qualitative research, aimed to investigate married women’s perspectives on screening for CC based on the protection motivation theory (PMT).\\n\\n\\n\\nTo this end, a total number of 20 married women, considering maximum variation in sampling in terms of age and level of education, were interviewed. Therefore, an in-depth semi-structured interview was used for data collection until saturation was reached. As well, the PMT was applied as the main framework to develop the interview items.\\n\\n\\n\\nEight categories, namely, intention, fear, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, response efficacy, self-efficacy, response cost, and social support, were identified based on data classification. \\nThe majority of the participants intended to have a Pap smear. Moreover, they believed that if women knew more about screening for cervical cancer, they would definitely do so. Most of participants 60% had a high level of perceived susceptibility and 100% of them had self-efficacy related to doing a Pap smear. Almost all the interviewees acknowledged the effectiveness of a Pap smear and its consequences but 80% of the participants reported that they could not follow regular tests due to response cost despite their self-efficacy and knowledge about the effectiveness and the benefits of this type of screening. All the study participants also put more emphasis on the role of social support to push them to get a Pap smear.\\n\\n\\n\\nResponse cost and social support should be considered factors encouraging married women to do a Pap smear during screening programs.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":371340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Womens Health Reviews\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Womens Health Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404818666220304104128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Womens Health Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404818666220304104128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

子宫颈癌(CC)是一种可治疗的癌症,可以通过长期的癌前状态和良好的筛查计划来预防。本研究采用定向内容分析的定性研究方法,旨在探讨基于保护动机理论(PMT)的已婚女性对CC筛查的看法。为此目的,考虑到抽样在年龄和教育水平方面的最大差异,总共采访了20名已婚妇女。因此,采用深度半结构化访谈进行数据收集,直到达到饱和。同时,我们也将PMT作为主要框架来开发访谈项目。根据数据分类,确定了意向、恐惧、感知易感性、感知严重性、反应效能、自我效能、反应成本和社会支持8个类别。大多数参与者打算做子宫颈抹片检查。此外,他们相信,如果女性对子宫颈癌筛查了解得更多,她们肯定会这样做。大多数参与者60%的人有高度的易感性100%的人对做子宫颈抹片检查有自我效能感。几乎所有的受访者都承认子宫颈抹片检查的有效性及其后果,但80%的参与者报告说,尽管他们的自我效能感和对这种筛查的有效性和益处的了解,但由于反应成本,他们不能定期进行检查。所有的研究参与者也更加强调社会支持的作用,促使他们接受子宫颈抹片检查。反应成本和社会支持应被视为鼓励已婚妇女在筛查项目中做子宫颈抹片检查的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perspectives of Married Women Related to Cervical Cancer Screening Test: A Theory Based Qualitative Study in Iran
Cervical cancer (CC) is one of the treatable forms of cancer which can be prevented in terms of its long precancerous conditions and good screening programs. Using directed content analysis, the present study, as qualitative research, aimed to investigate married women’s perspectives on screening for CC based on the protection motivation theory (PMT). To this end, a total number of 20 married women, considering maximum variation in sampling in terms of age and level of education, were interviewed. Therefore, an in-depth semi-structured interview was used for data collection until saturation was reached. As well, the PMT was applied as the main framework to develop the interview items. Eight categories, namely, intention, fear, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, response efficacy, self-efficacy, response cost, and social support, were identified based on data classification. The majority of the participants intended to have a Pap smear. Moreover, they believed that if women knew more about screening for cervical cancer, they would definitely do so. Most of participants 60% had a high level of perceived susceptibility and 100% of them had self-efficacy related to doing a Pap smear. Almost all the interviewees acknowledged the effectiveness of a Pap smear and its consequences but 80% of the participants reported that they could not follow regular tests due to response cost despite their self-efficacy and knowledge about the effectiveness and the benefits of this type of screening. All the study participants also put more emphasis on the role of social support to push them to get a Pap smear. Response cost and social support should be considered factors encouraging married women to do a Pap smear during screening programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信