{"title":"不确定概率与斯密和凯恩斯的不确定性","authors":"M. E. Brady","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2486025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Smith, Keynes, and Knight, in that order, made seminal contributions to decision making which emphasized uncertainty and indeterminate probabilities, as opposed to mere imprecision.De Finetti’s views on uncertainty are diametrically opposed to those of Smith, Keynes, and Knight once the clear cut distinction is drawn between imprecise probabilities and indeterminate probabilities.","PeriodicalId":299964,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of Action eJournal","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indeterminate Probabilities and Smithian and Keynesian Uncertainty\",\"authors\":\"M. E. Brady\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2486025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Smith, Keynes, and Knight, in that order, made seminal contributions to decision making which emphasized uncertainty and indeterminate probabilities, as opposed to mere imprecision.De Finetti’s views on uncertainty are diametrically opposed to those of Smith, Keynes, and Knight once the clear cut distinction is drawn between imprecise probabilities and indeterminate probabilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy of Action eJournal\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy of Action eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2486025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy of Action eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2486025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Indeterminate Probabilities and Smithian and Keynesian Uncertainty
Smith, Keynes, and Knight, in that order, made seminal contributions to decision making which emphasized uncertainty and indeterminate probabilities, as opposed to mere imprecision.De Finetti’s views on uncertainty are diametrically opposed to those of Smith, Keynes, and Knight once the clear cut distinction is drawn between imprecise probabilities and indeterminate probabilities.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
