E. Özkaya, Kamil Turgay, B. Durak, H. Tan, E. Ozalp, G. Bademci, S. Artan
{"title":"应用弹性超声评估女性压力性尿失禁的尿道下组织弹性","authors":"E. Özkaya, Kamil Turgay, B. Durak, H. Tan, E. Ozalp, G. Bademci, S. Artan","doi":"10.5505/TJOD.2013.60376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY Objective: To determine clinical and diagnostic value of elastosonography (ES) in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Material and methods: Thirty subjects with SUI and 30 subjects without SUI were compared in terms of elastosonographic suburethral tissue elasticity. SUI and bladder neck hypermobility was determined by pad test, Q-tip and stress tests. Measurements points included under bladder (UB), subcutaneous fatty tissue (SC), and the urethra (U) points. Three indices were calculated using these measurements (UB/SC, U/SC and UB/U). The diagnostic value of ES indices were investigated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. Results: ES UB/SC (AUC=0.962, P=0.001) and U/SC (AUC=0.953, P=0.001) were significant predictors for stress test positivity. ES UB/SC (AUC=0.883, P=0.001) and U/SC (AUC=0.885, P=0.001) were significant predictors for pad test positivity. ES UB/SC (AUC=0.877, P=0.001) and U/SC (AUC=0.857, P=0.001) were significant predictors for Q tip test positivity. In linear regression analysis, stress test positivity was significantly associated with the ES UB/SC (R2=0.84, beta=0.369, P=0.026) and ES U/SC (R2=0.84, beta=0.496, P=0.003). Conclusion: Elastosonographic tissue elasticity determination is a promising tool in bladder neck hypermobility and SUI diagnosis, and may be used as an adjunctive method in selecting patients appropriate for stress urinary incontinence surgery.","PeriodicalId":174635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology","volume":"159 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE UTILITY OF ELASTOSONOGRAPHY FOR ASSESSING SUBURETHRAL TISSUE ELASTICITY IN WOMEN WITH STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE\",\"authors\":\"E. Özkaya, Kamil Turgay, B. Durak, H. Tan, E. Ozalp, G. Bademci, S. Artan\",\"doi\":\"10.5505/TJOD.2013.60376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SUMMARY Objective: To determine clinical and diagnostic value of elastosonography (ES) in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Material and methods: Thirty subjects with SUI and 30 subjects without SUI were compared in terms of elastosonographic suburethral tissue elasticity. SUI and bladder neck hypermobility was determined by pad test, Q-tip and stress tests. Measurements points included under bladder (UB), subcutaneous fatty tissue (SC), and the urethra (U) points. Three indices were calculated using these measurements (UB/SC, U/SC and UB/U). The diagnostic value of ES indices were investigated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. Results: ES UB/SC (AUC=0.962, P=0.001) and U/SC (AUC=0.953, P=0.001) were significant predictors for stress test positivity. ES UB/SC (AUC=0.883, P=0.001) and U/SC (AUC=0.885, P=0.001) were significant predictors for pad test positivity. ES UB/SC (AUC=0.877, P=0.001) and U/SC (AUC=0.857, P=0.001) were significant predictors for Q tip test positivity. In linear regression analysis, stress test positivity was significantly associated with the ES UB/SC (R2=0.84, beta=0.369, P=0.026) and ES U/SC (R2=0.84, beta=0.496, P=0.003). Conclusion: Elastosonographic tissue elasticity determination is a promising tool in bladder neck hypermobility and SUI diagnosis, and may be used as an adjunctive method in selecting patients appropriate for stress urinary incontinence surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":174635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology\",\"volume\":\"159 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5505/TJOD.2013.60376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5505/TJOD.2013.60376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
THE UTILITY OF ELASTOSONOGRAPHY FOR ASSESSING SUBURETHRAL TISSUE ELASTICITY IN WOMEN WITH STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE
SUMMARY Objective: To determine clinical and diagnostic value of elastosonography (ES) in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Material and methods: Thirty subjects with SUI and 30 subjects without SUI were compared in terms of elastosonographic suburethral tissue elasticity. SUI and bladder neck hypermobility was determined by pad test, Q-tip and stress tests. Measurements points included under bladder (UB), subcutaneous fatty tissue (SC), and the urethra (U) points. Three indices were calculated using these measurements (UB/SC, U/SC and UB/U). The diagnostic value of ES indices were investigated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. Results: ES UB/SC (AUC=0.962, P=0.001) and U/SC (AUC=0.953, P=0.001) were significant predictors for stress test positivity. ES UB/SC (AUC=0.883, P=0.001) and U/SC (AUC=0.885, P=0.001) were significant predictors for pad test positivity. ES UB/SC (AUC=0.877, P=0.001) and U/SC (AUC=0.857, P=0.001) were significant predictors for Q tip test positivity. In linear regression analysis, stress test positivity was significantly associated with the ES UB/SC (R2=0.84, beta=0.369, P=0.026) and ES U/SC (R2=0.84, beta=0.496, P=0.003). Conclusion: Elastosonographic tissue elasticity determination is a promising tool in bladder neck hypermobility and SUI diagnosis, and may be used as an adjunctive method in selecting patients appropriate for stress urinary incontinence surgery.