研究水电导率对电击溺水风险的影响

M. Morse, J. Kotsch, Brandon Prussak, J. Kohl
{"title":"研究水电导率对电击溺水风险的影响","authors":"M. Morse, J. Kotsch, Brandon Prussak, J. Kohl","doi":"10.1109/ESW41045.2019.9024720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The common literature is full of articles discussing the risk of Electric Shock Drowning (ESD). Per these publications, the risk of ESD is specifically limited to current leakage in fresh water environments. Medical response to and treatment of ESD is based on this generally held belief. There appears to be no research or simulation establishing the true bounds and risk of ESD as a function of water conductivity. ESD is theorized to occur when leakage current passes through the body causing uncontrollable muscle contraction. The common belief is that ESD can only occur in fresh water where the current will be directed through the body because of its greater conductivity than the surrounding fresh water. It is broadly believed that in salt water, the current will shunt around the body. The authors have tested this theory using the Finite Element Method in simulations of conductivity (with units of Seimens per meter or S/m) ranging from .005 S/m (pure water) up to 4.8 S/m (salt water). The results suggest that there is varying shunting through the body as water ranges from fresh to salt. Further, the prevailing belief fails to consider that there is also a distinct current limiting affect that is inversely proportional to the conductivity of the water which in turn acts to narrow the “zone of danger” as water conductivity is decreased. It is imperative that there be public education that supersedes generally held myth and lore such that electrical injury risk is minimized in both salt and fresh water environments.","PeriodicalId":297284,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE IAS Electrical Safety Workshop (ESW)","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the Risk of Electric Shock Drowning (ESD) as a Function of Water Conductivity\",\"authors\":\"M. Morse, J. Kotsch, Brandon Prussak, J. Kohl\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ESW41045.2019.9024720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The common literature is full of articles discussing the risk of Electric Shock Drowning (ESD). Per these publications, the risk of ESD is specifically limited to current leakage in fresh water environments. Medical response to and treatment of ESD is based on this generally held belief. There appears to be no research or simulation establishing the true bounds and risk of ESD as a function of water conductivity. ESD is theorized to occur when leakage current passes through the body causing uncontrollable muscle contraction. The common belief is that ESD can only occur in fresh water where the current will be directed through the body because of its greater conductivity than the surrounding fresh water. It is broadly believed that in salt water, the current will shunt around the body. The authors have tested this theory using the Finite Element Method in simulations of conductivity (with units of Seimens per meter or S/m) ranging from .005 S/m (pure water) up to 4.8 S/m (salt water). The results suggest that there is varying shunting through the body as water ranges from fresh to salt. Further, the prevailing belief fails to consider that there is also a distinct current limiting affect that is inversely proportional to the conductivity of the water which in turn acts to narrow the “zone of danger” as water conductivity is decreased. It is imperative that there be public education that supersedes generally held myth and lore such that electrical injury risk is minimized in both salt and fresh water environments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":297284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE IAS Electrical Safety Workshop (ESW)\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE IAS Electrical Safety Workshop (ESW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESW41045.2019.9024720\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE IAS Electrical Safety Workshop (ESW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESW41045.2019.9024720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

普通文献中充斥着讨论电击溺水(ESD)风险的文章。根据这些出版物,ESD的风险特别限于淡水环境中的电流泄漏。对ESD的医疗反应和治疗就是基于这种普遍的信念。似乎没有研究或模拟建立ESD的真实界限和风险作为水电导率的函数。从理论上讲,当漏电流通过人体引起无法控制的肌肉收缩时,ESD就会发生。人们普遍认为,静电放电只能发生在淡水中,因为淡水的导电性比周围的淡水更大,因此电流将通过人体。人们普遍认为,在盐水中,水流会在身体周围分流。作者已经用有限元法测试了这一理论,模拟了从0.005 S/m(纯水)到4.8 S/m(盐水)的电导率(单位为每米西门子或S/m)。研究结果表明,当水从新鲜到含盐时,体内会有不同的分流。此外,普遍的观点没有考虑到还有一种明显的电流限制作用,这种影响与水的电导率成反比,而随着水的电导率降低,这种影响反过来又缩小了“危险区域”。当务之急是要有公众教育来取代普遍持有的神话和爱,这样在咸水和淡水环境中都可以将电伤风险降到最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the Risk of Electric Shock Drowning (ESD) as a Function of Water Conductivity
The common literature is full of articles discussing the risk of Electric Shock Drowning (ESD). Per these publications, the risk of ESD is specifically limited to current leakage in fresh water environments. Medical response to and treatment of ESD is based on this generally held belief. There appears to be no research or simulation establishing the true bounds and risk of ESD as a function of water conductivity. ESD is theorized to occur when leakage current passes through the body causing uncontrollable muscle contraction. The common belief is that ESD can only occur in fresh water where the current will be directed through the body because of its greater conductivity than the surrounding fresh water. It is broadly believed that in salt water, the current will shunt around the body. The authors have tested this theory using the Finite Element Method in simulations of conductivity (with units of Seimens per meter or S/m) ranging from .005 S/m (pure water) up to 4.8 S/m (salt water). The results suggest that there is varying shunting through the body as water ranges from fresh to salt. Further, the prevailing belief fails to consider that there is also a distinct current limiting affect that is inversely proportional to the conductivity of the water which in turn acts to narrow the “zone of danger” as water conductivity is decreased. It is imperative that there be public education that supersedes generally held myth and lore such that electrical injury risk is minimized in both salt and fresh water environments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信