Histria。扫描区域激光3D图努鲁伊I /历史。三维激光扫描塔I

M. Angelescu
{"title":"Histria。扫描区域激光3D图努鲁伊I /历史。三维激光扫描塔I","authors":"M. Angelescu","doi":"10.3406/mcarh.2019.2096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The laser 3D scanning process was accomplished using a Leica ScanStation 2 device with the following main technical features : pulsed laser, 1 inch compensated double shaft, scanned pixel density < 1 mm, max. 50.000 pts/ sec. The area of interest was Tower I of the post-Gothic, Late Roman precinct at Histria. The equipment belongs to the Museum of National History and Archeology in Constanța and was professionally operated by Irina Sodoleanu and Laurenţiu Cliante. A number of Histrian monuments (Domus, the Episcopal Basilica, fragments of the Late Roman fortification) were scanned on this occasion, but only the results of the operation on the Tower I of the Late Roman, post-Gothic city wall, are presented. Tower I is part of the first monument that was excavated after the discovery of the city of Histria – the Late Roman city wall whose first phase dates back to the second half of the 3rd century AD. On the west front of the Late Roman fortification, Tower I occupies an important place because it was the corner tower during the first phase of this defensive work. In fact, it would continue to be the corner tower until the C-phase of the enclosure, which would expand south, including the new south-eastern city district – built on the land gained from the sea, due to the accelerated sedimentation process that was taking place during those centuries and created the rapidly advancing Saele sandbank. Moreover, Tower I has a very complex stratigraphic situation due to the place where it was built. It overlaps both the Hellenistic enclosure wall of the Acropolis and the first phase of the post-Gothic enclosure, as well as the constructive elements of the Thermae. At the same time, it is embedded in the later stages of existence of the Late Roman fortification. For these reasons, Tower I is difficult to investigate because parts of these structures are identifiable in its substructure, and others can only be observed and investigated in the interior space. It is worth mentioning the very special construction technique used to build this part of the fortification, which uses instead of a foundation, a layer of column bodies placed transversely to the direction of the wall. The Late Roman fortification was built as a result of the mid 3rd century AD events, which led to the decommissioning of the previous city wall, located about 400 m to the west and which had been constructed during Trajan’s reign. Because it could not be built further south, due to the presence of the sea water, it inevitably overlapped the previous defensive structures. That is why it used the Hellenistic Acropolis fortification as a foundation that provided the necessary solidity to a defensive structure, and the pragmatism of the Roman constructors could not ignore its presence. The Hellenistic Acropolis wall was overlapped in this corner by the first phase of the Late Roman fortification and by its corner tower, that is Tower I. In the monography dedicated to the Thermae, Alexandru Suceveanu made a fundamental observation : that the construction of this wall, which appeared under the southern side of the Tower I, does not use mortar and this excludes the possibility that it may be considered as the continuation of the northern wall of the Q room of the Thermae, which is the real post-Gothic fortification. Therefore, the relationship between this enclosure and the Thermae monument in its first stage is extremely important, not only for the configuration of the Thermal building, but also for the dating of this phase of the city wall. The explanation of what was considered to be an unusual situation, namely the construction of a city wall, after two centuries and a half, over another city wall, became evident in the meantime : the first phase of the post-Gothic fortification (called \" Phase A\" of the Late Roman city wall and dated to the reign of Emperor Probus) was built using the Hellenistic enclosure as the foundation because the latter had been built exactly on the natural boundary that separated the Acropolis from the sea during the period of operation of the Greek and Roman city enclosures. The pragmatism of the Roman builders has decided to use this structure, which had been still very well preserved, to build the new city limit – a limit that could not advance to the south due to the presence of the sea. Only phase B of the post-Gothic enclosure would expand 28 m to the south to settle on the marshland that became only recently usable for constructions. Excavations at the base of the western corner of the new corner tower (Tower K) have shown that the marsh land still required reinforcement of the soil works to build the new enclosure (Phase B of the Late Roman city wall) that now encompasses a whole new quarter. Although the research was particularly difficult due to the presence of the groundwater bedding that permanently covers the limestone tiles forming the foundation of the Hellenistic Acropolis enclosure, we had the chance to record them using the extremely precise 3D scanner.","PeriodicalId":285703,"journal":{"name":"Materiale şi cercetãri arheologice (Serie nouã)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Histria. Scanarea laser 3D a Turnului I / Histria. 3D Laser scanning of the Tower I\",\"authors\":\"M. Angelescu\",\"doi\":\"10.3406/mcarh.2019.2096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The laser 3D scanning process was accomplished using a Leica ScanStation 2 device with the following main technical features : pulsed laser, 1 inch compensated double shaft, scanned pixel density < 1 mm, max. 50.000 pts/ sec. The area of interest was Tower I of the post-Gothic, Late Roman precinct at Histria. The equipment belongs to the Museum of National History and Archeology in Constanța and was professionally operated by Irina Sodoleanu and Laurenţiu Cliante. A number of Histrian monuments (Domus, the Episcopal Basilica, fragments of the Late Roman fortification) were scanned on this occasion, but only the results of the operation on the Tower I of the Late Roman, post-Gothic city wall, are presented. Tower I is part of the first monument that was excavated after the discovery of the city of Histria – the Late Roman city wall whose first phase dates back to the second half of the 3rd century AD. On the west front of the Late Roman fortification, Tower I occupies an important place because it was the corner tower during the first phase of this defensive work. In fact, it would continue to be the corner tower until the C-phase of the enclosure, which would expand south, including the new south-eastern city district – built on the land gained from the sea, due to the accelerated sedimentation process that was taking place during those centuries and created the rapidly advancing Saele sandbank. Moreover, Tower I has a very complex stratigraphic situation due to the place where it was built. It overlaps both the Hellenistic enclosure wall of the Acropolis and the first phase of the post-Gothic enclosure, as well as the constructive elements of the Thermae. At the same time, it is embedded in the later stages of existence of the Late Roman fortification. For these reasons, Tower I is difficult to investigate because parts of these structures are identifiable in its substructure, and others can only be observed and investigated in the interior space. It is worth mentioning the very special construction technique used to build this part of the fortification, which uses instead of a foundation, a layer of column bodies placed transversely to the direction of the wall. The Late Roman fortification was built as a result of the mid 3rd century AD events, which led to the decommissioning of the previous city wall, located about 400 m to the west and which had been constructed during Trajan’s reign. Because it could not be built further south, due to the presence of the sea water, it inevitably overlapped the previous defensive structures. That is why it used the Hellenistic Acropolis fortification as a foundation that provided the necessary solidity to a defensive structure, and the pragmatism of the Roman constructors could not ignore its presence. The Hellenistic Acropolis wall was overlapped in this corner by the first phase of the Late Roman fortification and by its corner tower, that is Tower I. In the monography dedicated to the Thermae, Alexandru Suceveanu made a fundamental observation : that the construction of this wall, which appeared under the southern side of the Tower I, does not use mortar and this excludes the possibility that it may be considered as the continuation of the northern wall of the Q room of the Thermae, which is the real post-Gothic fortification. Therefore, the relationship between this enclosure and the Thermae monument in its first stage is extremely important, not only for the configuration of the Thermal building, but also for the dating of this phase of the city wall. The explanation of what was considered to be an unusual situation, namely the construction of a city wall, after two centuries and a half, over another city wall, became evident in the meantime : the first phase of the post-Gothic fortification (called \\\" Phase A\\\" of the Late Roman city wall and dated to the reign of Emperor Probus) was built using the Hellenistic enclosure as the foundation because the latter had been built exactly on the natural boundary that separated the Acropolis from the sea during the period of operation of the Greek and Roman city enclosures. The pragmatism of the Roman builders has decided to use this structure, which had been still very well preserved, to build the new city limit – a limit that could not advance to the south due to the presence of the sea. Only phase B of the post-Gothic enclosure would expand 28 m to the south to settle on the marshland that became only recently usable for constructions. Excavations at the base of the western corner of the new corner tower (Tower K) have shown that the marsh land still required reinforcement of the soil works to build the new enclosure (Phase B of the Late Roman city wall) that now encompasses a whole new quarter. Although the research was particularly difficult due to the presence of the groundwater bedding that permanently covers the limestone tiles forming the foundation of the Hellenistic Acropolis enclosure, we had the chance to record them using the extremely precise 3D scanner.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Materiale şi cercetãri arheologice (Serie nouã)\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Materiale şi cercetãri arheologice (Serie nouã)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3406/mcarh.2019.2096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materiale şi cercetãri arheologice (Serie nouã)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/mcarh.2019.2096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

激光三维扫描过程使用徕卡ScanStation 2设备完成,其主要技术特点如下:脉冲激光,1英寸补偿双轴,扫描像素密度< 1 mm,最大。5万分/秒。感兴趣的区域是希斯特里亚后哥特式,罗马晚期区的1号塔。该设备属于Constanța国家历史和考古博物馆,由Irina Sodoleanu和Laurenţiu Cliante专业操作。许多历史遗迹(多莫斯,主教大教堂,罗马防御工事的碎片)被扫描在这个时候,但只有操作的结果,后哥特式城墙的罗马塔1,呈现。一号塔是希斯特里亚城被发现后出土的第一座纪念碑的一部分。希斯特里亚城是罗马晚期的城墙,其第一阶段可以追溯到公元3世纪下半叶。在罗马晚期防御工事的西侧,一号塔占据了一个重要的位置,因为它在防御工事的第一阶段是角塔。事实上,它将继续作为角楼,直到圈地的c阶段,它将向南扩展,包括新的东南城区——建在从海上获得的土地上,因为几个世纪以来发生的加速沉积过程创造了快速推进的萨勒沙洲。此外,由于一号塔的建造地点,它的地层情况非常复杂。它与雅典卫城的希腊化围护墙和后哥特式围护墙的第一阶段,以及Thermae的建设性元素重叠。同时,它也嵌入了罗马防御工事存在的后期阶段。由于这些原因,一号塔很难调查,因为这些结构的一部分可以在其子结构中识别,而其他结构只能在内部空间中观察和调查。值得一提的是,用于建造这部分防御工事的非常特殊的施工技术,它使用的不是基础,而是与墙的方向横向放置的一层柱体。罗马晚期的防御工事是公元3世纪中期事件的结果,这导致了之前的城墙的退役,城墙位于西边约400米,是在图拉真统治时期建造的。由于海水的存在,它不能再向南建造,因此不可避免地与以前的防御结构重叠。这就是为什么它使用希腊化的卫城防御工事作为基础,为防御结构提供必要的坚固性,罗马建设者的实用主义不能忽视它的存在。希腊化的卫城城墙在这个角落与晚期罗马防御工事的第一阶段和它的角塔,也就是第一塔重叠在一起。在关于Thermae的专著中,Alexandru Suceveanu做了一个基本的观察:这堵墙出现在1号塔的南侧,没有使用砂浆,这就排除了它可能被认为是Thermae Q室北墙的延续的可能性,后者是真正的后哥特式防御工事。因此,这个围场和第一阶段的Thermae纪念碑之间的关系非常重要,不仅对于热建筑的配置,而且对于城墙的这一阶段的年代。两个半世纪后,在另一堵城墙上建造了一座城墙,这被认为是一种不寻常的情况,与此同时,对这一现象的解释变得明显起来:后哥特式防御工事的第一阶段(被称为罗马晚期城墙的“A阶段”,可以追溯到普罗布斯皇帝统治时期)是用希腊化的围城作为基础建造的,因为后者正是在希腊和罗马围城运作期间将卫城与大海分开的自然边界上建造的。罗马建筑者的实用主义决定使用这个保存完好的结构来建造新的城市边界——由于大海的存在,这个边界不能向南推进。后哥特式围场的B阶段将向南扩展28米,安置在最近才开始用于建筑的沼泽地上。在新角塔(K塔)西角底部的挖掘表明,沼泽地仍然需要加固土壤工程来建造新的围墙(后期罗马城墙的B阶段),现在包含了一个全新的区域。 尽管由于地下水层的存在,研究特别困难,因为地下水层永久地覆盖在形成希腊卫城围场基础的石灰石瓦上,我们有机会使用极其精确的3D扫描仪记录它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Histria. Scanarea laser 3D a Turnului I / Histria. 3D Laser scanning of the Tower I
The laser 3D scanning process was accomplished using a Leica ScanStation 2 device with the following main technical features : pulsed laser, 1 inch compensated double shaft, scanned pixel density < 1 mm, max. 50.000 pts/ sec. The area of interest was Tower I of the post-Gothic, Late Roman precinct at Histria. The equipment belongs to the Museum of National History and Archeology in Constanța and was professionally operated by Irina Sodoleanu and Laurenţiu Cliante. A number of Histrian monuments (Domus, the Episcopal Basilica, fragments of the Late Roman fortification) were scanned on this occasion, but only the results of the operation on the Tower I of the Late Roman, post-Gothic city wall, are presented. Tower I is part of the first monument that was excavated after the discovery of the city of Histria – the Late Roman city wall whose first phase dates back to the second half of the 3rd century AD. On the west front of the Late Roman fortification, Tower I occupies an important place because it was the corner tower during the first phase of this defensive work. In fact, it would continue to be the corner tower until the C-phase of the enclosure, which would expand south, including the new south-eastern city district – built on the land gained from the sea, due to the accelerated sedimentation process that was taking place during those centuries and created the rapidly advancing Saele sandbank. Moreover, Tower I has a very complex stratigraphic situation due to the place where it was built. It overlaps both the Hellenistic enclosure wall of the Acropolis and the first phase of the post-Gothic enclosure, as well as the constructive elements of the Thermae. At the same time, it is embedded in the later stages of existence of the Late Roman fortification. For these reasons, Tower I is difficult to investigate because parts of these structures are identifiable in its substructure, and others can only be observed and investigated in the interior space. It is worth mentioning the very special construction technique used to build this part of the fortification, which uses instead of a foundation, a layer of column bodies placed transversely to the direction of the wall. The Late Roman fortification was built as a result of the mid 3rd century AD events, which led to the decommissioning of the previous city wall, located about 400 m to the west and which had been constructed during Trajan’s reign. Because it could not be built further south, due to the presence of the sea water, it inevitably overlapped the previous defensive structures. That is why it used the Hellenistic Acropolis fortification as a foundation that provided the necessary solidity to a defensive structure, and the pragmatism of the Roman constructors could not ignore its presence. The Hellenistic Acropolis wall was overlapped in this corner by the first phase of the Late Roman fortification and by its corner tower, that is Tower I. In the monography dedicated to the Thermae, Alexandru Suceveanu made a fundamental observation : that the construction of this wall, which appeared under the southern side of the Tower I, does not use mortar and this excludes the possibility that it may be considered as the continuation of the northern wall of the Q room of the Thermae, which is the real post-Gothic fortification. Therefore, the relationship between this enclosure and the Thermae monument in its first stage is extremely important, not only for the configuration of the Thermal building, but also for the dating of this phase of the city wall. The explanation of what was considered to be an unusual situation, namely the construction of a city wall, after two centuries and a half, over another city wall, became evident in the meantime : the first phase of the post-Gothic fortification (called " Phase A" of the Late Roman city wall and dated to the reign of Emperor Probus) was built using the Hellenistic enclosure as the foundation because the latter had been built exactly on the natural boundary that separated the Acropolis from the sea during the period of operation of the Greek and Roman city enclosures. The pragmatism of the Roman builders has decided to use this structure, which had been still very well preserved, to build the new city limit – a limit that could not advance to the south due to the presence of the sea. Only phase B of the post-Gothic enclosure would expand 28 m to the south to settle on the marshland that became only recently usable for constructions. Excavations at the base of the western corner of the new corner tower (Tower K) have shown that the marsh land still required reinforcement of the soil works to build the new enclosure (Phase B of the Late Roman city wall) that now encompasses a whole new quarter. Although the research was particularly difficult due to the presence of the groundwater bedding that permanently covers the limestone tiles forming the foundation of the Hellenistic Acropolis enclosure, we had the chance to record them using the extremely precise 3D scanner.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信