从战争到福利:战后无家可归、流离失所和福利国家在欧洲的诞生:以柏林1945-1949为例

Clara M. Oberle
{"title":"从战争到福利:战后无家可归、流离失所和福利国家在欧洲的诞生:以柏林1945-1949为例","authors":"Clara M. Oberle","doi":"10.3384/HYGIEA.1403-8668.1091279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"n past years, with state funding for public health and welfare undergoing much scrutiny, historians and public health policy makers alike have proposed to study the origins of what for years could be characterized as a European welfare consensus. Was there indeed any such conversion of approaches? And if so, what caused it? Among others, the Phoenix network, a coalition of scholars studying health care and medical policies over the course of Europe’s history and in its present, called for an investigation of moments in European history when thinking on public health and welfare policies converged. This paper proposes that indeed there was a period in European history which generated something of a postwar convergence of approaches. The postwar period witnessed a remarkable consensus about the importance of public planning, spending, and state involvement in the health and welfare sector. By examining the case of Berlin as one immediate postwar city and situating it in the larger European context of the time, one can point to common motivations and actors involved. The root of this consensus was not any optimistic humanitarian ideology, nor even primarily a concern for public health or the spread of epidemics. Rather, it grew out of a shared setting, marked by physical destruction and political instability. As a result, profound concerns about governability and the legitimacy of any state came to the forefront. In the case of Berlin, this was aggravated furthermore by a fear of the return of National Socialism. I","PeriodicalId":448368,"journal":{"name":"Hygiea Internationalis : An Interdisciplinary Journal for The History of Public Health","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Warfare to Welfare: Postwar Homelessness, Dislocation, and the Birth of the Welfare State in Europe: The Case of Berlin 1945–1949\",\"authors\":\"Clara M. Oberle\",\"doi\":\"10.3384/HYGIEA.1403-8668.1091279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"n past years, with state funding for public health and welfare undergoing much scrutiny, historians and public health policy makers alike have proposed to study the origins of what for years could be characterized as a European welfare consensus. Was there indeed any such conversion of approaches? And if so, what caused it? Among others, the Phoenix network, a coalition of scholars studying health care and medical policies over the course of Europe’s history and in its present, called for an investigation of moments in European history when thinking on public health and welfare policies converged. This paper proposes that indeed there was a period in European history which generated something of a postwar convergence of approaches. The postwar period witnessed a remarkable consensus about the importance of public planning, spending, and state involvement in the health and welfare sector. By examining the case of Berlin as one immediate postwar city and situating it in the larger European context of the time, one can point to common motivations and actors involved. The root of this consensus was not any optimistic humanitarian ideology, nor even primarily a concern for public health or the spread of epidemics. Rather, it grew out of a shared setting, marked by physical destruction and political instability. As a result, profound concerns about governability and the legitimacy of any state came to the forefront. In the case of Berlin, this was aggravated furthermore by a fear of the return of National Socialism. I\",\"PeriodicalId\":448368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hygiea Internationalis : An Interdisciplinary Journal for The History of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hygiea Internationalis : An Interdisciplinary Journal for The History of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3384/HYGIEA.1403-8668.1091279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hygiea Internationalis : An Interdisciplinary Journal for The History of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3384/HYGIEA.1403-8668.1091279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几年里,随着国家对公共卫生和福利的资助受到严格审查,历史学家和公共卫生政策制定者都提议研究多年来可以被称为欧洲福利共识的起源。确实有过这种方法的转换吗?如果是这样,是什么引起的呢?其中,凤凰网(Phoenix network)是一个由研究欧洲历史和现在的医疗保健和医疗政策的学者组成的联盟,它呼吁对欧洲历史上公共卫生和福利政策思想融合的时刻进行调查。本文提出,在欧洲历史上确实有一段时期产生了某种战后方法的趋同。战后时期,人们对公共规划、支出和国家参与卫生和福利部门的重要性达成了显著共识。通过研究柏林作为一个战后城市的案例,并将其置于当时更大的欧洲背景下,人们可以指出共同的动机和参与者。这种协商一致的根源不是任何乐观的人道主义意识形态,甚至主要也不是对公共卫生或流行病蔓延的关切。相反,它是在一个以物质破坏和政治不稳定为特征的共同环境中发展起来的。其结果是,对任何国家的治理能力和合法性的深刻担忧浮出水面。在柏林的情况下,对国家社会主义卷土重来的恐惧进一步加剧了这种情况。我
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Warfare to Welfare: Postwar Homelessness, Dislocation, and the Birth of the Welfare State in Europe: The Case of Berlin 1945–1949
n past years, with state funding for public health and welfare undergoing much scrutiny, historians and public health policy makers alike have proposed to study the origins of what for years could be characterized as a European welfare consensus. Was there indeed any such conversion of approaches? And if so, what caused it? Among others, the Phoenix network, a coalition of scholars studying health care and medical policies over the course of Europe’s history and in its present, called for an investigation of moments in European history when thinking on public health and welfare policies converged. This paper proposes that indeed there was a period in European history which generated something of a postwar convergence of approaches. The postwar period witnessed a remarkable consensus about the importance of public planning, spending, and state involvement in the health and welfare sector. By examining the case of Berlin as one immediate postwar city and situating it in the larger European context of the time, one can point to common motivations and actors involved. The root of this consensus was not any optimistic humanitarian ideology, nor even primarily a concern for public health or the spread of epidemics. Rather, it grew out of a shared setting, marked by physical destruction and political instability. As a result, profound concerns about governability and the legitimacy of any state came to the forefront. In the case of Berlin, this was aggravated furthermore by a fear of the return of National Socialism. I
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信