第九章:通过解放式残疾研究范式和参与式学术模式批判技术传播中的残疾和无障碍研究

Sushil K. Oswal, Zsuzsanna B. Palmer
{"title":"第九章:通过解放式残疾研究范式和参与式学术模式批判技术传播中的残疾和无障碍研究","authors":"Sushil K. Oswal, Zsuzsanna B. Palmer","doi":"10.37514/tpc-b.2022.1381.2.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The last two decades have seen an increase in articles about disability and accessibility within technical and professional communication (TPC) scholarship. As disabled users make up a sizeable portion of all users that our field aims to serve, this development is certainly a welcome change. However, as this chapter points out, disability and accessibility scholarship within the field has fallen short of keeping up with recent developments in the field of disability studies. Through a critique of three articles within the TPC field, the first half of this chapter highlights areas in our scholarship that need improvement in order to not only keep up with developments in other fields but also to better address the needs of this specific group of users. The second half of the chapter then introduces participatory design and participatory action research from the perspective of emancipatory research paradigm as two approaches to interface and product design, research, and pedagogy and shows how these approaches have the potential to propel TPC scholarship towards being more inclusive and mindful of users with disability. The chapter concludes with two substantive examples that foster participatory design and participatory action research as a way to illustrate the practical application of these approaches in research and pedagogy. The seven-point heuristics introduced in this chapter can be employed as an independent tool for assessing the value of disability studies-centered research and pedagogy in a variety of settings.","PeriodicalId":176047,"journal":{"name":"Assembling Critical Components: A Framework for Sustaining Technical and Professional Communication","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chapter 9: A Critique of Disability and Accessibility Research in Technical Communication Through the Models of Emancipatory Disability Research Paradigm and Participatory Scholarship\",\"authors\":\"Sushil K. Oswal, Zsuzsanna B. Palmer\",\"doi\":\"10.37514/tpc-b.2022.1381.2.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The last two decades have seen an increase in articles about disability and accessibility within technical and professional communication (TPC) scholarship. As disabled users make up a sizeable portion of all users that our field aims to serve, this development is certainly a welcome change. However, as this chapter points out, disability and accessibility scholarship within the field has fallen short of keeping up with recent developments in the field of disability studies. Through a critique of three articles within the TPC field, the first half of this chapter highlights areas in our scholarship that need improvement in order to not only keep up with developments in other fields but also to better address the needs of this specific group of users. The second half of the chapter then introduces participatory design and participatory action research from the perspective of emancipatory research paradigm as two approaches to interface and product design, research, and pedagogy and shows how these approaches have the potential to propel TPC scholarship towards being more inclusive and mindful of users with disability. The chapter concludes with two substantive examples that foster participatory design and participatory action research as a way to illustrate the practical application of these approaches in research and pedagogy. The seven-point heuristics introduced in this chapter can be employed as an independent tool for assessing the value of disability studies-centered research and pedagogy in a variety of settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":176047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assembling Critical Components: A Framework for Sustaining Technical and Professional Communication\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assembling Critical Components: A Framework for Sustaining Technical and Professional Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37514/tpc-b.2022.1381.2.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assembling Critical Components: A Framework for Sustaining Technical and Professional Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37514/tpc-b.2022.1381.2.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的二十年里,在技术和专业交流(TPC)的学术研究中,关于残疾和无障碍的文章有所增加。由于残疾用户在我们的领域旨在服务的所有用户中占相当大的一部分,因此这一发展无疑是一个受欢迎的变化。然而,正如本章所指出的,残疾和无障碍领域的学术研究已经跟不上残疾研究领域的最新发展。通过对TPC领域内的三篇文章的评论,本章的前半部分强调了我们的学术需要改进的领域,以便不仅跟上其他领域的发展,而且更好地满足这一特定用户群体的需求。本章的后半部分从解放式研究范式的角度介绍了参与式设计和参与式行动研究,作为界面和产品设计、研究和教学的两种方法,并展示了这些方法如何有潜力推动TPC学术更加包容和关注残疾用户。本章最后以两个实质性的例子来促进参与式设计和参与式行动研究,以此来说明这些方法在研究和教学中的实际应用。本章中介绍的七点启发式可以作为一种独立的工具来评估以残疾研究为中心的研究和教学方法在各种环境中的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chapter 9: A Critique of Disability and Accessibility Research in Technical Communication Through the Models of Emancipatory Disability Research Paradigm and Participatory Scholarship
The last two decades have seen an increase in articles about disability and accessibility within technical and professional communication (TPC) scholarship. As disabled users make up a sizeable portion of all users that our field aims to serve, this development is certainly a welcome change. However, as this chapter points out, disability and accessibility scholarship within the field has fallen short of keeping up with recent developments in the field of disability studies. Through a critique of three articles within the TPC field, the first half of this chapter highlights areas in our scholarship that need improvement in order to not only keep up with developments in other fields but also to better address the needs of this specific group of users. The second half of the chapter then introduces participatory design and participatory action research from the perspective of emancipatory research paradigm as two approaches to interface and product design, research, and pedagogy and shows how these approaches have the potential to propel TPC scholarship towards being more inclusive and mindful of users with disability. The chapter concludes with two substantive examples that foster participatory design and participatory action research as a way to illustrate the practical application of these approaches in research and pedagogy. The seven-point heuristics introduced in this chapter can be employed as an independent tool for assessing the value of disability studies-centered research and pedagogy in a variety of settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信