心脏瓣膜手术患者测量心输出量的动脉压波形分析

Kazancı Dilek, Turan Sema, Tezcan Büşra, Ünver Süheyla, A. Bahar, Güçlü Ç Yıldırım, Koç Mihrican, Özgök Ayşegül
{"title":"心脏瓣膜手术患者测量心输出量的动脉压波形分析","authors":"Kazancı Dilek, Turan Sema, Tezcan Büşra, Ünver Süheyla, A. Bahar, Güçlü Ç Yıldırım, Koç Mihrican, Özgök Ayşegül","doi":"10.36959/582/440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thermodilution via pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) is commonly accepted as gold standart method for cardiac output measurements. The new method Flotrac/VigileoTM system calculates cardiac output (CO) by analyzing arterial pressure waveform and has recently been marketed which have the ability to monitor CO noninvasively. In this study we compared Flotrac/VigileoTM (FV) in patients undergoing valvular heart surgery with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurement. Nineteen patients, who would undergo isolated valve replacement surgery were included into the study. All patients were monitored with PAC and FV monitoring systems. Cardiac outputs were measured at four different stages of the operation: After induction of anesthesia (T1), before cannulation (T2), after cardiopulmonary bypass (T3) and after sternal closure (T4). There was no difference between demografic data of patients. CO measurements obtained with the FV system were higher for the T1, and T4 measurements; lower for the T2 and T3 than did those obtained with the PAC. For all measurement stages, good agreements were found between two methods as shown by Bland-Altman statistics. Although many studies are reported for the evaluation of the FV in the operating theatre we could find no studies that have examined this method in isolated valvular heart surgery patients. We compared two different CO measurement methods: FV and PAC in valve replacement surgery patients. The CO values provided by FV were similar to the PAC values that may be considered as gold standart. We concluded that FV is easier to use and less invasive than PAC and would be a good choice in determining CO in patients who will have valvular cardiac surgery.","PeriodicalId":143338,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Therapeutics","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing Arterial Pressure Waveform for Cardiac Output Measurement in Valvular Heart Surgery Patients\",\"authors\":\"Kazancı Dilek, Turan Sema, Tezcan Büşra, Ünver Süheyla, A. Bahar, Güçlü Ç Yıldırım, Koç Mihrican, Özgök Ayşegül\",\"doi\":\"10.36959/582/440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thermodilution via pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) is commonly accepted as gold standart method for cardiac output measurements. The new method Flotrac/VigileoTM system calculates cardiac output (CO) by analyzing arterial pressure waveform and has recently been marketed which have the ability to monitor CO noninvasively. In this study we compared Flotrac/VigileoTM (FV) in patients undergoing valvular heart surgery with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurement. Nineteen patients, who would undergo isolated valve replacement surgery were included into the study. All patients were monitored with PAC and FV monitoring systems. Cardiac outputs were measured at four different stages of the operation: After induction of anesthesia (T1), before cannulation (T2), after cardiopulmonary bypass (T3) and after sternal closure (T4). There was no difference between demografic data of patients. CO measurements obtained with the FV system were higher for the T1, and T4 measurements; lower for the T2 and T3 than did those obtained with the PAC. For all measurement stages, good agreements were found between two methods as shown by Bland-Altman statistics. Although many studies are reported for the evaluation of the FV in the operating theatre we could find no studies that have examined this method in isolated valvular heart surgery patients. We compared two different CO measurement methods: FV and PAC in valve replacement surgery patients. The CO values provided by FV were similar to the PAC values that may be considered as gold standart. We concluded that FV is easier to use and less invasive than PAC and would be a good choice in determining CO in patients who will have valvular cardiac surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36959/582/440\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36959/582/440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经肺动脉导管热稀释(PAC)被普遍认为是测量心输出量的金标准方法。Flotrac/VigileoTM系统通过分析动脉压力波形来计算心输出量(CO),最近已经上市,具有无创监测CO的能力。在这项研究中,我们比较了Flotrac/VigileoTM (FV)在接受心脏瓣膜手术的患者中与肺动脉心输出量的测量。19名接受孤立瓣膜置换术的患者被纳入研究。所有患者均采用PAC和FV监测系统监测。在麻醉诱导后(T1)、插管前(T2)、体外循环后(T3)和胸骨关闭后(T4)四个不同的手术阶段测量心输出量。患者的人口学数据没有差异。在T1和T4测量中,FV系统获得的CO测量值更高;T2和T3的测量结果低于PAC。在所有测量阶段,Bland-Altman统计表明,两种方法之间存在良好的一致性。虽然有许多关于手术室FV评估的研究报道,但没有发现在孤立的心脏瓣膜手术患者中检验这种方法的研究。我们比较了两种不同的CO测量方法:FV和PAC在瓣膜置换术患者。FV提供的CO值与可被视为黄金标准的PAC值相似。我们的结论是,FV比PAC更容易使用,侵入性更小,将是确定有瓣膜心脏手术患者CO的良好选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analyzing Arterial Pressure Waveform for Cardiac Output Measurement in Valvular Heart Surgery Patients
Thermodilution via pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) is commonly accepted as gold standart method for cardiac output measurements. The new method Flotrac/VigileoTM system calculates cardiac output (CO) by analyzing arterial pressure waveform and has recently been marketed which have the ability to monitor CO noninvasively. In this study we compared Flotrac/VigileoTM (FV) in patients undergoing valvular heart surgery with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurement. Nineteen patients, who would undergo isolated valve replacement surgery were included into the study. All patients were monitored with PAC and FV monitoring systems. Cardiac outputs were measured at four different stages of the operation: After induction of anesthesia (T1), before cannulation (T2), after cardiopulmonary bypass (T3) and after sternal closure (T4). There was no difference between demografic data of patients. CO measurements obtained with the FV system were higher for the T1, and T4 measurements; lower for the T2 and T3 than did those obtained with the PAC. For all measurement stages, good agreements were found between two methods as shown by Bland-Altman statistics. Although many studies are reported for the evaluation of the FV in the operating theatre we could find no studies that have examined this method in isolated valvular heart surgery patients. We compared two different CO measurement methods: FV and PAC in valve replacement surgery patients. The CO values provided by FV were similar to the PAC values that may be considered as gold standart. We concluded that FV is easier to use and less invasive than PAC and would be a good choice in determining CO in patients who will have valvular cardiac surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信