宏观长寿风险分担的经济学

Dirk Broeders, R. Mehlkopf, Annick van Ool
{"title":"宏观长寿风险分担的经济学","authors":"Dirk Broeders, R. Mehlkopf, Annick van Ool","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3311420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Pension funds face macro-longevity risk or uncertainty about future mortality rates. We analyze macro-longevity risk sharing between cohorts in a pension scheme as a risk management tool. We show that the optimal risk-sharing rule and the welfare gains from risk sharing largely depend on the retirement age policy. In case of a fixed retirement age welfare gains from sharing macro-longevity risk measured on a 10-year horizon are between 0.1 and 0.3 percent of certainty equivalent consumption after retirement for each cohort. By contrast, if the retirement age is fully linked to changes in life expectancy, welfare gains are substantially higher. In this case the risk bearing capacity of workers is particularly large because their labor supply acts as a hedge against macro-longevity risk. As a result, workers absorb risk from retirees in the optimal risk-sharing rule, thereby increasing the welfare gain for each cohort up to 1.8 percent in the Lee–Carter mortality model and up to 2.9 percent in the Cairns-Blake-Dowd model.","PeriodicalId":431230,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Consumption","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Economics of Sharing Macro-longevity Risk\",\"authors\":\"Dirk Broeders, R. Mehlkopf, Annick van Ool\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3311420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Pension funds face macro-longevity risk or uncertainty about future mortality rates. We analyze macro-longevity risk sharing between cohorts in a pension scheme as a risk management tool. We show that the optimal risk-sharing rule and the welfare gains from risk sharing largely depend on the retirement age policy. In case of a fixed retirement age welfare gains from sharing macro-longevity risk measured on a 10-year horizon are between 0.1 and 0.3 percent of certainty equivalent consumption after retirement for each cohort. By contrast, if the retirement age is fully linked to changes in life expectancy, welfare gains are substantially higher. In this case the risk bearing capacity of workers is particularly large because their labor supply acts as a hedge against macro-longevity risk. As a result, workers absorb risk from retirees in the optimal risk-sharing rule, thereby increasing the welfare gain for each cohort up to 1.8 percent in the Lee–Carter mortality model and up to 2.9 percent in the Cairns-Blake-Dowd model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Consumption\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Consumption\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3311420\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3311420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

养老基金面临宏观长寿风险或未来死亡率的不确定性。我们分析宏观长寿风险分担在养老金计划的队列之间作为风险管理工具。研究表明,最优风险分担规则和风险分担带来的福利收益在很大程度上取决于退休年龄政策。在固定退休年龄的情况下,以10年为尺度来衡量,分享宏观寿命风险所带来的福利收益,在每个群体退休后的确定性等效消费的0.1%至0.3%之间。相比之下,如果退休年龄与预期寿命的变化完全挂钩,福利收益就会高得多。在这种情况下,工人的风险承受能力特别大,因为他们的劳动力供给起到了对冲宏观长寿风险的作用。因此,在最优风险分担规则中,工人吸收了退休人员的风险,从而使每个群体的福利收益在李-卡特死亡率模型中增加了1.8%,在凯恩斯-布莱克-多德模型中增加了2.9%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Economics of Sharing Macro-longevity Risk
Abstract Pension funds face macro-longevity risk or uncertainty about future mortality rates. We analyze macro-longevity risk sharing between cohorts in a pension scheme as a risk management tool. We show that the optimal risk-sharing rule and the welfare gains from risk sharing largely depend on the retirement age policy. In case of a fixed retirement age welfare gains from sharing macro-longevity risk measured on a 10-year horizon are between 0.1 and 0.3 percent of certainty equivalent consumption after retirement for each cohort. By contrast, if the retirement age is fully linked to changes in life expectancy, welfare gains are substantially higher. In this case the risk bearing capacity of workers is particularly large because their labor supply acts as a hedge against macro-longevity risk. As a result, workers absorb risk from retirees in the optimal risk-sharing rule, thereby increasing the welfare gain for each cohort up to 1.8 percent in the Lee–Carter mortality model and up to 2.9 percent in the Cairns-Blake-Dowd model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信