大学级别性侵犯预防的初级预防和风险降低:说明综合方法的好处

M. Holtzman, Chadwick L. Menning
{"title":"大学级别性侵犯预防的初级预防和风险降低:说明综合方法的好处","authors":"M. Holtzman, Chadwick L. Menning","doi":"10.21768/EJOPA.V4I2.74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Primary prevention and risk reduction strategies for reducing sexual assault on college campuses have generally been treated as distinct categories of programming, with greater emphasis placed on primary prevention in recent years. The authors propose that there is both theoretical justification and measurable benefit to synthesizing or coordinating carefully constructed primary prevention and risk reduction programming. They provide as support a summary of assessment findings from an exemplary program and discuss implications and future directions for program development and testing.","PeriodicalId":434223,"journal":{"name":"eJournal of Public Affairs","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary Prevention and Risk Reduction for College-Level Sexual Assault Prevention: Illustrating the Benefits of a Combined Approach\",\"authors\":\"M. Holtzman, Chadwick L. Menning\",\"doi\":\"10.21768/EJOPA.V4I2.74\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Primary prevention and risk reduction strategies for reducing sexual assault on college campuses have generally been treated as distinct categories of programming, with greater emphasis placed on primary prevention in recent years. The authors propose that there is both theoretical justification and measurable benefit to synthesizing or coordinating carefully constructed primary prevention and risk reduction programming. They provide as support a summary of assessment findings from an exemplary program and discuss implications and future directions for program development and testing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":434223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"eJournal of Public Affairs\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"eJournal of Public Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21768/EJOPA.V4I2.74\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eJournal of Public Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21768/EJOPA.V4I2.74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

减少大学校园性侵犯的初级预防和降低风险策略通常被视为不同类别的规划,近年来更加强调初级预防。作者提出,综合或协调精心编制的初级预防和减少风险规划既有理论上的理由,也有可衡量的效益。他们从一个示范性项目中总结了评估结果,并讨论了项目开发和测试的含义和未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Primary Prevention and Risk Reduction for College-Level Sexual Assault Prevention: Illustrating the Benefits of a Combined Approach
Primary prevention and risk reduction strategies for reducing sexual assault on college campuses have generally been treated as distinct categories of programming, with greater emphasis placed on primary prevention in recent years. The authors propose that there is both theoretical justification and measurable benefit to synthesizing or coordinating carefully constructed primary prevention and risk reduction programming. They provide as support a summary of assessment findings from an exemplary program and discuss implications and future directions for program development and testing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信