海报:重新思考可信第三方的风险和回报

J. Malchow, Benjamin Güldenring, Volker Roth
{"title":"海报:重新思考可信第三方的风险和回报","authors":"J. Malchow, Benjamin Güldenring, Volker Roth","doi":"10.1145/2976749.2989060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Commercial trusted third parties (TTPs) may increase their bottom line by watering down their validation procedures because they assume no liability for lapses of judgement. Consumers bear the risk of misplaced trust. Reputation loss is a weak deterrent for TTPs because consumers do not choose them - web shops and browser vendors do. At the same time, consumers are the source of income of these parties. Hence, risks and rewards are not well-aligned. Towards a better alignment, we explore the brokering of connection insurances and transaction insurances, where consumers get to choose their insurer. We lay out the principal idea how such a brokerage might work at a technical level with minimal interference with existing protocols and mechanisms, we analyze the security requirements and we propose techniques to meet these requirements.","PeriodicalId":432261,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"POSTER: Re-Thinking Risks and Rewards for Trusted Third Parties\",\"authors\":\"J. Malchow, Benjamin Güldenring, Volker Roth\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2976749.2989060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Commercial trusted third parties (TTPs) may increase their bottom line by watering down their validation procedures because they assume no liability for lapses of judgement. Consumers bear the risk of misplaced trust. Reputation loss is a weak deterrent for TTPs because consumers do not choose them - web shops and browser vendors do. At the same time, consumers are the source of income of these parties. Hence, risks and rewards are not well-aligned. Towards a better alignment, we explore the brokering of connection insurances and transaction insurances, where consumers get to choose their insurer. We lay out the principal idea how such a brokerage might work at a technical level with minimal interference with existing protocols and mechanisms, we analyze the security requirements and we propose techniques to meet these requirements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2976749.2989060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2976749.2989060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

商业可信第三方(TTPs)可能会通过简化验证程序来增加他们的底线,因为他们对判断失误不承担任何责任。消费者承担了错误信任的风险。声誉损失对ttp来说是一个微弱的威慑,因为消费者不会选择它们——选择它们的是网络商店和浏览器供应商。同时,消费者又是这些当事人的收入来源。因此,风险和回报并没有很好地协调一致。为了更好地协调,我们探讨了连接保险和交易保险的中介,消费者可以选择他们的保险公司。我们列出了这样一个代理如何在技术层面上工作的主要思想,并将对现有协议和机制的干扰降到最低,我们分析了安全需求,并提出了满足这些需求的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
POSTER: Re-Thinking Risks and Rewards for Trusted Third Parties
Commercial trusted third parties (TTPs) may increase their bottom line by watering down their validation procedures because they assume no liability for lapses of judgement. Consumers bear the risk of misplaced trust. Reputation loss is a weak deterrent for TTPs because consumers do not choose them - web shops and browser vendors do. At the same time, consumers are the source of income of these parties. Hence, risks and rewards are not well-aligned. Towards a better alignment, we explore the brokering of connection insurances and transaction insurances, where consumers get to choose their insurer. We lay out the principal idea how such a brokerage might work at a technical level with minimal interference with existing protocols and mechanisms, we analyze the security requirements and we propose techniques to meet these requirements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信