自适应阈值迭代稀疏信号处理

F. Marvasti, M. Azghani, P. Imani, P. Pakrouh, Seyed Javad Heydari, A. Golmohammadi, A. Kazerouni, M. M. Khalili
{"title":"自适应阈值迭代稀疏信号处理","authors":"F. Marvasti, M. Azghani, P. Imani, P. Pakrouh, Seyed Javad Heydari, A. Golmohammadi, A. Kazerouni, M. M. Khalili","doi":"10.1109/ICTEL.2012.6221328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classical sampling theorem states that by using an anti-aliased low-pass filter at the Nyquist rate, one can transmit and retrieve the filtered signal. This approach, which has been used for decades in signal processing, is not good for high quality speech, image and video signals where the actual signals are not low-pass but rather sparse. The traditional sampling theorems do not work for sparse signals. Modern approach, developed by statisticians at Stanford (Donoho and Candes), give some lower bounds for the minimum sampling rate such that a sparse signal can be retrieved with high probability. However, their approach, using a sampling matrix called compressive matrix, has certain drawbacks: Compressive matrices require the knowledge of all the samples, which defeats the whole purpose of compressive sampling! Moreover, for real signals, one does not need a compressive matrix and we shall show in this invited paper that random sampling performs as good as or better than compressive sampling. In addition, we show that greedy methods such as Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP) are too complex with inferior performance compared to IMAT and other iterative methods. Furthermore, we shall compare IMAT to OMP and other reconstruction methods in term of complexity and show the advantages of IMAT. Various applications such as image and speech recovery from random or block losses, salt & pepper noise, OFDM channel estimation, MRI, and finally spectral estimation will be discussed and simulated.","PeriodicalId":413534,"journal":{"name":"2012 19th International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sparse signal processing using iterative method with adaptive thresholding (IMAT)\",\"authors\":\"F. Marvasti, M. Azghani, P. Imani, P. Pakrouh, Seyed Javad Heydari, A. Golmohammadi, A. Kazerouni, M. M. Khalili\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICTEL.2012.6221328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Classical sampling theorem states that by using an anti-aliased low-pass filter at the Nyquist rate, one can transmit and retrieve the filtered signal. This approach, which has been used for decades in signal processing, is not good for high quality speech, image and video signals where the actual signals are not low-pass but rather sparse. The traditional sampling theorems do not work for sparse signals. Modern approach, developed by statisticians at Stanford (Donoho and Candes), give some lower bounds for the minimum sampling rate such that a sparse signal can be retrieved with high probability. However, their approach, using a sampling matrix called compressive matrix, has certain drawbacks: Compressive matrices require the knowledge of all the samples, which defeats the whole purpose of compressive sampling! Moreover, for real signals, one does not need a compressive matrix and we shall show in this invited paper that random sampling performs as good as or better than compressive sampling. In addition, we show that greedy methods such as Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP) are too complex with inferior performance compared to IMAT and other iterative methods. Furthermore, we shall compare IMAT to OMP and other reconstruction methods in term of complexity and show the advantages of IMAT. Various applications such as image and speech recovery from random or block losses, salt & pepper noise, OFDM channel estimation, MRI, and finally spectral estimation will be discussed and simulated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 19th International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT)\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 19th International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTEL.2012.6221328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 19th International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTEL.2012.6221328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

摘要

经典采样定理表明,通过使用奈奎斯特速率的抗混叠低通滤波器,可以传输和检索滤波后的信号。这种方法在信号处理中已经使用了几十年,但对于高质量的语音、图像和视频信号来说并不好,因为实际信号不是低通的,而是稀疏的。传统的采样定理不适用于稀疏信号。由斯坦福大学统计学家(Donoho和Candes)开发的现代方法给出了最小采样率的一些下界,从而可以高概率地检索稀疏信号。然而,他们的方法,使用一种称为压缩矩阵的采样矩阵,有一定的缺点:压缩矩阵需要所有样本的知识,这违背了压缩采样的整个目的!此外,对于真实信号,人们不需要压缩矩阵,我们将在这篇受邀的论文中证明随机抽样的性能与压缩抽样一样好,甚至更好。此外,我们还证明了贪婪方法如正交匹配追踪(OMP)过于复杂,与IMAT和其他迭代方法相比性能较差。此外,我们将IMAT与OMP等重建方法在复杂性上进行比较,并展示IMAT的优势。各种应用,如图像和语音从随机或块损失恢复,盐和胡椒噪声,OFDM信道估计,MRI,最后的频谱估计将讨论和模拟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sparse signal processing using iterative method with adaptive thresholding (IMAT)
Classical sampling theorem states that by using an anti-aliased low-pass filter at the Nyquist rate, one can transmit and retrieve the filtered signal. This approach, which has been used for decades in signal processing, is not good for high quality speech, image and video signals where the actual signals are not low-pass but rather sparse. The traditional sampling theorems do not work for sparse signals. Modern approach, developed by statisticians at Stanford (Donoho and Candes), give some lower bounds for the minimum sampling rate such that a sparse signal can be retrieved with high probability. However, their approach, using a sampling matrix called compressive matrix, has certain drawbacks: Compressive matrices require the knowledge of all the samples, which defeats the whole purpose of compressive sampling! Moreover, for real signals, one does not need a compressive matrix and we shall show in this invited paper that random sampling performs as good as or better than compressive sampling. In addition, we show that greedy methods such as Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP) are too complex with inferior performance compared to IMAT and other iterative methods. Furthermore, we shall compare IMAT to OMP and other reconstruction methods in term of complexity and show the advantages of IMAT. Various applications such as image and speech recovery from random or block losses, salt & pepper noise, OFDM channel estimation, MRI, and finally spectral estimation will be discussed and simulated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信