摄影究竟记录了什么?摄影的社会性及其在关于媒体和现实的辩论中的不变角色

N. Toksoy
{"title":"摄影究竟记录了什么?摄影的社会性及其在关于媒体和现实的辩论中的不变角色","authors":"N. Toksoy","doi":"10.13114/mjh.2019.504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the course of modernization, photography expresses much more than simply keeping a record of the transformed life. It is one of the channels in which we find answers to the questions of how modern identities and belonging are defined, how aspects of life will be made visible and how they will be transferred to the memory of future generations. In this article photography is positioned as a tool of a sociological perspective. In the modernization of the 19 century, photography was perceived as the object of inquiry about the transformations spreading through the whole of social life. In this context, we propose the photograph was one of the ways of explaining capitalist economies that are taking shape and the functioning of social power. The debates on the social functions of images currently in progress arose in the early stages of image production. Questioning the technologies of image production of this period enables us to understand the new technologies coming together in the past. It nourishes our discussions on the social functions of distribution networks. In this context, we aim to make connections between the first examples of technically generated images and the debates continuing to the present day, by opening up the visual regime, rethinking the concepts of the observer subject. These links draw attention to the relationship between the unchanging images of the image market and the construction of social memory. Re-evaluating the meaning of photographic records as documents enables us to see continuities in their value of use. In particular, images of violence and wars, which obtain a large footprint in the media, have had a strong influence in the formation of social justice. In this context, this research aims to contribute to the on-going debates on the impact of images today by focusing upon images with strong social impact.","PeriodicalId":102642,"journal":{"name":"mediterranean journal of humanities","volume":"272 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fotoğraf Aslında Neyin Belgesi Fotoğrafın Toplumsallığı ve Medya ve Gerçeklik Tartışmalarında Değişmeyen Rolü\",\"authors\":\"N. Toksoy\",\"doi\":\"10.13114/mjh.2019.504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the course of modernization, photography expresses much more than simply keeping a record of the transformed life. It is one of the channels in which we find answers to the questions of how modern identities and belonging are defined, how aspects of life will be made visible and how they will be transferred to the memory of future generations. In this article photography is positioned as a tool of a sociological perspective. In the modernization of the 19 century, photography was perceived as the object of inquiry about the transformations spreading through the whole of social life. In this context, we propose the photograph was one of the ways of explaining capitalist economies that are taking shape and the functioning of social power. The debates on the social functions of images currently in progress arose in the early stages of image production. Questioning the technologies of image production of this period enables us to understand the new technologies coming together in the past. It nourishes our discussions on the social functions of distribution networks. In this context, we aim to make connections between the first examples of technically generated images and the debates continuing to the present day, by opening up the visual regime, rethinking the concepts of the observer subject. These links draw attention to the relationship between the unchanging images of the image market and the construction of social memory. Re-evaluating the meaning of photographic records as documents enables us to see continuities in their value of use. In particular, images of violence and wars, which obtain a large footprint in the media, have had a strong influence in the formation of social justice. In this context, this research aims to contribute to the on-going debates on the impact of images today by focusing upon images with strong social impact.\",\"PeriodicalId\":102642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"mediterranean journal of humanities\",\"volume\":\"272 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"mediterranean journal of humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13114/mjh.2019.504\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mediterranean journal of humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13114/mjh.2019.504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在现代化的过程中,摄影所表达的不仅仅是对生活变化的记录。它是我们寻找现代身份和归属如何定义的答案的渠道之一,如何使生活的各个方面变得可见,以及如何将它们转移到后代的记忆中。在这篇文章中,摄影被定位为社会学视角的工具。在19世纪的现代化进程中,摄影被认为是对贯穿整个社会生活的变革进行探究的对象。在这种背景下,我们认为这张照片是解释正在形成的资本主义经济和社会权力运作的一种方式。目前正在进行的关于图像社会功能的争论,起源于图像生产的早期阶段。质疑这一时期的影像制作技术,可以让我们了解过去汇集的新技术。它丰富了我们对配电网社会功能的讨论。在这种情况下,我们的目标是通过开放视觉制度,重新思考观察者主体的概念,将技术生成图像的第一个例子与持续到今天的辩论联系起来。这些联系引起了人们对形象市场中不变的形象与社会记忆建构之间关系的关注。重新评价摄影记录作为文献的意义,使我们看到其使用价值的连续性。特别是暴力和战争的形象在传播媒介上留下了大量的足迹,对社会正义的形成产生了强烈的影响。在此背景下,本研究旨在通过关注具有强烈社会影响的图像,为正在进行的关于图像影响的辩论做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fotoğraf Aslında Neyin Belgesi Fotoğrafın Toplumsallığı ve Medya ve Gerçeklik Tartışmalarında Değişmeyen Rolü
During the course of modernization, photography expresses much more than simply keeping a record of the transformed life. It is one of the channels in which we find answers to the questions of how modern identities and belonging are defined, how aspects of life will be made visible and how they will be transferred to the memory of future generations. In this article photography is positioned as a tool of a sociological perspective. In the modernization of the 19 century, photography was perceived as the object of inquiry about the transformations spreading through the whole of social life. In this context, we propose the photograph was one of the ways of explaining capitalist economies that are taking shape and the functioning of social power. The debates on the social functions of images currently in progress arose in the early stages of image production. Questioning the technologies of image production of this period enables us to understand the new technologies coming together in the past. It nourishes our discussions on the social functions of distribution networks. In this context, we aim to make connections between the first examples of technically generated images and the debates continuing to the present day, by opening up the visual regime, rethinking the concepts of the observer subject. These links draw attention to the relationship between the unchanging images of the image market and the construction of social memory. Re-evaluating the meaning of photographic records as documents enables us to see continuities in their value of use. In particular, images of violence and wars, which obtain a large footprint in the media, have had a strong influence in the formation of social justice. In this context, this research aims to contribute to the on-going debates on the impact of images today by focusing upon images with strong social impact.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信