群体创造力和集体选择

Garold Stasser, Zachary Birchmeier
{"title":"群体创造力和集体选择","authors":"Garold Stasser, Zachary Birchmeier","doi":"10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195147308.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Identifying creative collective decisions often depends on pooling diverse information. However, groups tend to focus on commonly known information and forego full consideration of all information known to members. Among the reasons for this state of affairs is that consensus often implies correctness, there is a bias for common information that is typically seen as credible and compelling. The SCOPE model identifies factors that facilitate effective information exchange and thereby increase the likelihood of creative decisions. A group climate that is conducive to information exchange, provision of opportunities to share information, using optimal procedures such as the nominal group technique or electronic communication systems, and assigning expert roles are highlighted as ways of enhancing information exchange in groups.","PeriodicalId":257448,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Group Creativity and Innovation","volume":"176 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"54","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Group Creativity and Collective Choice\",\"authors\":\"Garold Stasser, Zachary Birchmeier\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195147308.003.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Identifying creative collective decisions often depends on pooling diverse information. However, groups tend to focus on commonly known information and forego full consideration of all information known to members. Among the reasons for this state of affairs is that consensus often implies correctness, there is a bias for common information that is typically seen as credible and compelling. The SCOPE model identifies factors that facilitate effective information exchange and thereby increase the likelihood of creative decisions. A group climate that is conducive to information exchange, provision of opportunities to share information, using optimal procedures such as the nominal group technique or electronic communication systems, and assigning expert roles are highlighted as ways of enhancing information exchange in groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":257448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Group Creativity and Innovation\",\"volume\":\"176 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"54\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Group Creativity and Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195147308.003.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Group Creativity and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195147308.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

摘要

确定创造性的集体决策通常依赖于收集不同的信息。然而,群体倾向于关注众所周知的信息,而放弃对成员已知的所有信息的充分考虑。造成这种状况的原因之一是,共识往往意味着正确,对通常被视为可信和令人信服的公共信息存在偏见。SCOPE模型确定促进有效信息交换的因素,从而增加创造性决策的可能性。强调了有利于信息交换的群体氛围,提供分享信息的机会,使用诸如名义上的群体技术或电子通信系统等最佳程序,以及分配专家角色,作为加强群体信息交换的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Group Creativity and Collective Choice
Identifying creative collective decisions often depends on pooling diverse information. However, groups tend to focus on commonly known information and forego full consideration of all information known to members. Among the reasons for this state of affairs is that consensus often implies correctness, there is a bias for common information that is typically seen as credible and compelling. The SCOPE model identifies factors that facilitate effective information exchange and thereby increase the likelihood of creative decisions. A group climate that is conducive to information exchange, provision of opportunities to share information, using optimal procedures such as the nominal group technique or electronic communication systems, and assigning expert roles are highlighted as ways of enhancing information exchange in groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信