两用的合同

Katharina Huber
{"title":"两用的合同","authors":"Katharina Huber","doi":"10.25364/01.5:2018.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dual-use contracts are contracts concluded in part for private and in part for business purposes. The question under what conditions dual-use contracts qualify as consumer contracts has been a matter of debate among Austrian scholars for some time, in particular since the decision of the Austrian Supreme Court OGH 7 Ob 94/14w of 2015. Using a consumer sales contract as an exemplary case, this article examines the proper qualification of dual-use contracts. It focuses on the autonomous interpretation of the Consumer Sales Directive, taking into account the interplay between this Directive and the Consumer Rights Directive. The focus of this article thus lies on the interpretation of Austrian law in light of the Consumer Sales Directive. In this context, the contribution also considers Sec. 344 of the Austrian Commercial Code, according to which, in doubtful situations, a transaction must be qualified as a business transaction.","PeriodicalId":258698,"journal":{"name":"Austrian Law Journal","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual-Use Contracts\",\"authors\":\"Katharina Huber\",\"doi\":\"10.25364/01.5:2018.2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dual-use contracts are contracts concluded in part for private and in part for business purposes. The question under what conditions dual-use contracts qualify as consumer contracts has been a matter of debate among Austrian scholars for some time, in particular since the decision of the Austrian Supreme Court OGH 7 Ob 94/14w of 2015. Using a consumer sales contract as an exemplary case, this article examines the proper qualification of dual-use contracts. It focuses on the autonomous interpretation of the Consumer Sales Directive, taking into account the interplay between this Directive and the Consumer Rights Directive. The focus of this article thus lies on the interpretation of Austrian law in light of the Consumer Sales Directive. In this context, the contribution also considers Sec. 344 of the Austrian Commercial Code, according to which, in doubtful situations, a transaction must be qualified as a business transaction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":258698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austrian Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austrian Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25364/01.5:2018.2.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austrian Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25364/01.5:2018.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

两用合同是部分为私人目的,部分为商业目的而签订的合同。在何种条件下,军民两用合同符合消费者合同的资格,这一问题在奥地利学者之间争论了一段时间,特别是自奥地利最高法院2015年OGH 7 Ob 94/14w决定以来。本文以消费者销售合同为例,探讨了军民两用合同的正当资格问题。它侧重于消费者销售指令的自主解释,考虑到该指令与消费者权利指令之间的相互作用。因此,本文的重点在于根据《消费者销售指令》对奥地利法律的解释。在这方面,提交文件还审议了《奥地利商法》第344条,根据该条,在有疑问的情况下,交易必须限定为商业交易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dual-Use Contracts
Dual-use contracts are contracts concluded in part for private and in part for business purposes. The question under what conditions dual-use contracts qualify as consumer contracts has been a matter of debate among Austrian scholars for some time, in particular since the decision of the Austrian Supreme Court OGH 7 Ob 94/14w of 2015. Using a consumer sales contract as an exemplary case, this article examines the proper qualification of dual-use contracts. It focuses on the autonomous interpretation of the Consumer Sales Directive, taking into account the interplay between this Directive and the Consumer Rights Directive. The focus of this article thus lies on the interpretation of Austrian law in light of the Consumer Sales Directive. In this context, the contribution also considers Sec. 344 of the Austrian Commercial Code, according to which, in doubtful situations, a transaction must be qualified as a business transaction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信