支持动态决策的汇报:一项实证研究

Hassan Qudrat-Ullah
{"title":"支持动态决策的汇报:一项实证研究","authors":"Hassan Qudrat-Ullah","doi":"10.1109/ICALT.2004.1357414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes an empirical, laboratory-experiment-based evaluation of the effectiveness of debriefing in the context of interactive learning environments. A comprehensive model consisting of 4 evaluation criteria are developed and used: task performance, structural knowledge, heuristics, and cognitive effort. On these criteria, debriefing versus no debriefing are compared. It is found that debriefing was effective on all 4 criteria; debriefing improves task performance, helps user learn more about the decision domain, develop heuristics, and expend less cognitive effort in decision making.","PeriodicalId":291817,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 2004. Proceedings.","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Debriefing in support of dynamic decision making: an empirical study\",\"authors\":\"Hassan Qudrat-Ullah\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICALT.2004.1357414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper describes an empirical, laboratory-experiment-based evaluation of the effectiveness of debriefing in the context of interactive learning environments. A comprehensive model consisting of 4 evaluation criteria are developed and used: task performance, structural knowledge, heuristics, and cognitive effort. On these criteria, debriefing versus no debriefing are compared. It is found that debriefing was effective on all 4 criteria; debriefing improves task performance, helps user learn more about the decision domain, develop heuristics, and expend less cognitive effort in decision making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":291817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 2004. Proceedings.\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 2004. Proceedings.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2004.1357414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 2004. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2004.1357414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文描述了一种基于实验室实验的交互式学习环境下述职汇报有效性的实证评估。开发并使用了一个由4个评价标准组成的综合模型:任务绩效、结构知识、启发式和认知努力。根据这些标准,对汇报与不汇报进行比较。结果表明,述职对4项指标均有效;汇报可以提高任务性能,帮助用户更多地了解决策领域,开发启发式方法,并在决策制定中减少认知努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Debriefing in support of dynamic decision making: an empirical study
This paper describes an empirical, laboratory-experiment-based evaluation of the effectiveness of debriefing in the context of interactive learning environments. A comprehensive model consisting of 4 evaluation criteria are developed and used: task performance, structural knowledge, heuristics, and cognitive effort. On these criteria, debriefing versus no debriefing are compared. It is found that debriefing was effective on all 4 criteria; debriefing improves task performance, helps user learn more about the decision domain, develop heuristics, and expend less cognitive effort in decision making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信