任务特异性训练与神经发育训练联合常规治疗对慢性脑卒中患者上肢运动功能的影响

{"title":"任务特异性训练与神经发育训练联合常规治疗对慢性脑卒中患者上肢运动功能的影响","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jnh.08.02.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective The purpose of the study is to determine the effect of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Vs Balance Exercise along with Conventional Therapy for balance and gait in Chronic Parkinson’s patients. Study Design Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). Place and Duration of study This study took place in Lahore, Pakistan and the duration of the study was 6 months. Method This study is a Randomized Controlled Trial utilized a non-probability purposive sampling technique, the primary outcome measure was Berg Balance Scale and Functional Gait Assessment which were used to check the balance and gait. The findings were then statistically analysed by non parametric tests Mann Whitney U Test and Friedman Test were used for between group and within the group comparisons respectively. Results A total of 60 patients participated in the study among which after randomized allocation of 30(50%) in PNF group and 30(50%) in Balance T group. The data shows that there is a big difference mean value difference between the two groups i.e. Balance T group showed better results than the PNF group and the p value is 0.000 which is less than 0.05 hence suggesting that the difference between both the experimental the groups after 12 weeks is highly significant. Hence we are rejecting the Null hypothesis and accepting the alternating hypothesis. . The data shows that there is a difference mean value difference between the two groups i.e. Balance T group showed better results than the PNF group and the p value is 0.492 which is more than 0.05 hence suggesting that the difference between both the experimental the groups after 12 weeks is non-significant. Hence we are rejecting the Alternate Hypothesis and accepting the Null Hypothesis. Conclusion Both of the treatment approaches have proven to be effective in treatment of balance of lower limb among chronic Parkinson’s patients but the Balance Exercises has proven to be significantly more effective than of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and show effective results in the treatment of balance more efficiently but among two of these treatment strategies none of them has been proven to be better than other for gait. Discussion In the current study where PNF and Balance exercise are compared to each other shows that Balance exercise is highly effective for the treatment of balance in chronic Parkinson’s patients as compared to PNF. However Del Carmen et.al. Conducted a research in 2019 i.e. “the development of ballet exercises with Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation techniques for patients with Parkinson’s disease” which indicated that of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation technique also improve balance and gait in Parkinson’s disease patients [1].","PeriodicalId":302843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing & Healthcare","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Task Specific Training Vs Neuro Developmental Training Approach Along with Conventional Therapy for Upper Limb Motor Function Among Chronic Stroke Patients\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.33140/jnh.08.02.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective The purpose of the study is to determine the effect of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Vs Balance Exercise along with Conventional Therapy for balance and gait in Chronic Parkinson’s patients. Study Design Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). Place and Duration of study This study took place in Lahore, Pakistan and the duration of the study was 6 months. Method This study is a Randomized Controlled Trial utilized a non-probability purposive sampling technique, the primary outcome measure was Berg Balance Scale and Functional Gait Assessment which were used to check the balance and gait. The findings were then statistically analysed by non parametric tests Mann Whitney U Test and Friedman Test were used for between group and within the group comparisons respectively. Results A total of 60 patients participated in the study among which after randomized allocation of 30(50%) in PNF group and 30(50%) in Balance T group. The data shows that there is a big difference mean value difference between the two groups i.e. Balance T group showed better results than the PNF group and the p value is 0.000 which is less than 0.05 hence suggesting that the difference between both the experimental the groups after 12 weeks is highly significant. Hence we are rejecting the Null hypothesis and accepting the alternating hypothesis. . The data shows that there is a difference mean value difference between the two groups i.e. Balance T group showed better results than the PNF group and the p value is 0.492 which is more than 0.05 hence suggesting that the difference between both the experimental the groups after 12 weeks is non-significant. Hence we are rejecting the Alternate Hypothesis and accepting the Null Hypothesis. Conclusion Both of the treatment approaches have proven to be effective in treatment of balance of lower limb among chronic Parkinson’s patients but the Balance Exercises has proven to be significantly more effective than of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and show effective results in the treatment of balance more efficiently but among two of these treatment strategies none of them has been proven to be better than other for gait. Discussion In the current study where PNF and Balance exercise are compared to each other shows that Balance exercise is highly effective for the treatment of balance in chronic Parkinson’s patients as compared to PNF. However Del Carmen et.al. Conducted a research in 2019 i.e. “the development of ballet exercises with Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation techniques for patients with Parkinson’s disease” which indicated that of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation technique also improve balance and gait in Parkinson’s disease patients [1].\",\"PeriodicalId\":302843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing & Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing & Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33140/jnh.08.02.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing & Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jnh.08.02.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的探讨本体感觉神经肌肉促进与平衡运动联合常规治疗对慢性帕金森病患者平衡和步态的影响。研究设计随机对照试验(RCT)。研究地点和研究时间本研究在巴基斯坦拉合尔进行,研究时间为6个月。方法采用非概率有目的抽样方法,采用随机对照试验,主要评价指标为Berg平衡量表和功能步态评定量表。然后通过非参数检验对结果进行统计分析,Mann Whitney U检验和Friedman检验分别用于组间和组内比较。结果共60例患者参与研究,其中随机分配30例(50%)为PNF组,30例(50%)为Balance T组。数据显示,两组间的均值差异较大,即Balance T组优于PNF组,p值为0.000,小于0.05,说明12周后两组间的差异非常显著。因此,我们拒绝零假设,接受交替假设。数据显示,两组间存在均值差异,即Balance T组优于PNF组,p值为0.492,p值大于0.05,说明12周后两组间的差异无统计学意义。因此,我们拒绝备用假设,接受零假设。结论两种治疗方法均可有效治疗慢性帕金森病患者的下肢平衡,但平衡训练明显优于本体感觉神经肌肉促进法,且对平衡的治疗效果更明显,但两种治疗方法对步态的治疗效果均不优于其他治疗方法。在目前将PNF和Balance运动进行比较的研究中,我们发现Balance运动比PNF更能有效地治疗慢性帕金森患者的平衡。然而,Del Carmen等人。2019年开展的“帕金森病患者本体感觉神经肌肉促进技术芭蕾练习的开发”研究表明,本体感觉神经肌肉促进技术还能改善帕金森病患者的平衡和步态[1]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Task Specific Training Vs Neuro Developmental Training Approach Along with Conventional Therapy for Upper Limb Motor Function Among Chronic Stroke Patients
Objective The purpose of the study is to determine the effect of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Vs Balance Exercise along with Conventional Therapy for balance and gait in Chronic Parkinson’s patients. Study Design Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). Place and Duration of study This study took place in Lahore, Pakistan and the duration of the study was 6 months. Method This study is a Randomized Controlled Trial utilized a non-probability purposive sampling technique, the primary outcome measure was Berg Balance Scale and Functional Gait Assessment which were used to check the balance and gait. The findings were then statistically analysed by non parametric tests Mann Whitney U Test and Friedman Test were used for between group and within the group comparisons respectively. Results A total of 60 patients participated in the study among which after randomized allocation of 30(50%) in PNF group and 30(50%) in Balance T group. The data shows that there is a big difference mean value difference between the two groups i.e. Balance T group showed better results than the PNF group and the p value is 0.000 which is less than 0.05 hence suggesting that the difference between both the experimental the groups after 12 weeks is highly significant. Hence we are rejecting the Null hypothesis and accepting the alternating hypothesis. . The data shows that there is a difference mean value difference between the two groups i.e. Balance T group showed better results than the PNF group and the p value is 0.492 which is more than 0.05 hence suggesting that the difference between both the experimental the groups after 12 weeks is non-significant. Hence we are rejecting the Alternate Hypothesis and accepting the Null Hypothesis. Conclusion Both of the treatment approaches have proven to be effective in treatment of balance of lower limb among chronic Parkinson’s patients but the Balance Exercises has proven to be significantly more effective than of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and show effective results in the treatment of balance more efficiently but among two of these treatment strategies none of them has been proven to be better than other for gait. Discussion In the current study where PNF and Balance exercise are compared to each other shows that Balance exercise is highly effective for the treatment of balance in chronic Parkinson’s patients as compared to PNF. However Del Carmen et.al. Conducted a research in 2019 i.e. “the development of ballet exercises with Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation techniques for patients with Parkinson’s disease” which indicated that of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation technique also improve balance and gait in Parkinson’s disease patients [1].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信