混沌作为多部门和系统性危机背景下的法律和宪法概念

Anderson Vichinkeski Teixeira
{"title":"混沌作为多部门和系统性危机背景下的法律和宪法概念","authors":"Anderson Vichinkeski Teixeira","doi":"10.52028/rihj.v21.i33.art03.rs","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the need to overcome the dualism of normality and exception, this article will discuss the possibility of developing chaos as a legal-constitutional concept, especially in contexts of multisectoral crises and systemic crises. Initially, a historical reconstruction of the origins of conceptual categories such as nomos, normality, exception and chaos will be carried out. Following, the concepts of crisis and syndemic will be the subject of a brief analysis. Finally, the concept of chaos will be framed in the legal-constitutional plan as an entity ontologically opposed to constitutional normality.","PeriodicalId":448198,"journal":{"name":"Revista do Instituto de Hermenêutica Jurídica","volume":"303 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O caos como conceito jurídico-constitucional em um contexto de crises multissetoriais e sistêmicas\",\"authors\":\"Anderson Vichinkeski Teixeira\",\"doi\":\"10.52028/rihj.v21.i33.art03.rs\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on the need to overcome the dualism of normality and exception, this article will discuss the possibility of developing chaos as a legal-constitutional concept, especially in contexts of multisectoral crises and systemic crises. Initially, a historical reconstruction of the origins of conceptual categories such as nomos, normality, exception and chaos will be carried out. Following, the concepts of crisis and syndemic will be the subject of a brief analysis. Finally, the concept of chaos will be framed in the legal-constitutional plan as an entity ontologically opposed to constitutional normality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista do Instituto de Hermenêutica Jurídica\",\"volume\":\"303 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista do Instituto de Hermenêutica Jurídica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52028/rihj.v21.i33.art03.rs\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista do Instituto de Hermenêutica Jurídica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52028/rihj.v21.i33.art03.rs","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于克服常态与例外的二元论的需要,本文将讨论将混乱发展为一种法律-宪法概念的可能性,特别是在多部门危机和系统性危机的背景下。首先,将对nomos、normality、exception和chaos等概念范畴的起源进行历史重构。下面,将对危机和综合症的概念进行简要分析。最后,混沌概念将在法制化计划中作为一个与宪政常态对立的本体论实体而被框定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
O caos como conceito jurídico-constitucional em um contexto de crises multissetoriais e sistêmicas
Based on the need to overcome the dualism of normality and exception, this article will discuss the possibility of developing chaos as a legal-constitutional concept, especially in contexts of multisectoral crises and systemic crises. Initially, a historical reconstruction of the origins of conceptual categories such as nomos, normality, exception and chaos will be carried out. Following, the concepts of crisis and syndemic will be the subject of a brief analysis. Finally, the concept of chaos will be framed in the legal-constitutional plan as an entity ontologically opposed to constitutional normality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信