基于TID2013的图像视觉质量度量验证:均方误差缺陷的探索

N. Ponomarenko, V. Lukin, O. Ieremeiev, B. Vozel, K. Chehdi, K. Egiazarian, J. Astola
{"title":"基于TID2013的图像视觉质量度量验证:均方误差缺陷的探索","authors":"N. Ponomarenko, V. Lukin, O. Ieremeiev, B. Vozel, K. Chehdi, K. Egiazarian, J. Astola","doi":"10.1109/EUVIP.2014.7018376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Specialized image databases like TID2013, allow quantitative evaluation of adequateness to human perception characterized by mean opinion score (MOS) and a verified full-reference visual quality metric using certain criterions such as rank order correlation coefficients (ROCC). In this paper, we propose modifications of known Spearman and Kendall ROCCs that take into account the fact that MOS for existing databases has been measured with a limited accuracy and is most certainly erroneous (contains “noise component”). For the database TID2013 we have also marked images with practically invisible distortions. This has led to considering criteria for detecting such images. Using a mean square error we also analyze metrics based on alternative norms l1, l3, and l4. Analysis is performed for the database TID2013 and different sensitivity of human vision system (HVS) to distortions in color and intensity is taken into account. One approach to analyze adequateness of metrics for different types of distortions is described and proved exploitable.","PeriodicalId":442246,"journal":{"name":"2014 5th European Workshop on Visual Information Processing (EUVIP)","volume":"171 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Image visual quality metrics verification by TID2013: Exploring of mean square error drawbacks\",\"authors\":\"N. Ponomarenko, V. Lukin, O. Ieremeiev, B. Vozel, K. Chehdi, K. Egiazarian, J. Astola\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EUVIP.2014.7018376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Specialized image databases like TID2013, allow quantitative evaluation of adequateness to human perception characterized by mean opinion score (MOS) and a verified full-reference visual quality metric using certain criterions such as rank order correlation coefficients (ROCC). In this paper, we propose modifications of known Spearman and Kendall ROCCs that take into account the fact that MOS for existing databases has been measured with a limited accuracy and is most certainly erroneous (contains “noise component”). For the database TID2013 we have also marked images with practically invisible distortions. This has led to considering criteria for detecting such images. Using a mean square error we also analyze metrics based on alternative norms l1, l3, and l4. Analysis is performed for the database TID2013 and different sensitivity of human vision system (HVS) to distortions in color and intensity is taken into account. One approach to analyze adequateness of metrics for different types of distortions is described and proved exploitable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":442246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 5th European Workshop on Visual Information Processing (EUVIP)\",\"volume\":\"171 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 5th European Workshop on Visual Information Processing (EUVIP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EUVIP.2014.7018376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 5th European Workshop on Visual Information Processing (EUVIP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EUVIP.2014.7018376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

像TID2013这样的专业图像数据库,允许对人类感知的适当性进行定量评估,以平均意见评分(MOS)为特征,并使用某些标准(如秩序相关系数(ROCC))验证全参考视觉质量度量。在本文中,我们提出了对已知的Spearman和Kendall rocc的修改,考虑到现有数据库的MOS测量精度有限,并且肯定是错误的(包含“噪声成分”)。对于TID2013数据库,我们还标记了几乎看不见的扭曲图像。这导致考虑检测此类图像的标准。我们还使用均方误差分析了基于备选规范l1、l3和14的度量。对TID2013数据库进行了分析,并考虑了人类视觉系统(HVS)对颜色和强度失真的不同敏感性。一种方法来分析指标的适当性为不同类型的扭曲被描述和证明可利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Image visual quality metrics verification by TID2013: Exploring of mean square error drawbacks
Specialized image databases like TID2013, allow quantitative evaluation of adequateness to human perception characterized by mean opinion score (MOS) and a verified full-reference visual quality metric using certain criterions such as rank order correlation coefficients (ROCC). In this paper, we propose modifications of known Spearman and Kendall ROCCs that take into account the fact that MOS for existing databases has been measured with a limited accuracy and is most certainly erroneous (contains “noise component”). For the database TID2013 we have also marked images with practically invisible distortions. This has led to considering criteria for detecting such images. Using a mean square error we also analyze metrics based on alternative norms l1, l3, and l4. Analysis is performed for the database TID2013 and different sensitivity of human vision system (HVS) to distortions in color and intensity is taken into account. One approach to analyze adequateness of metrics for different types of distortions is described and proved exploitable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信