塑料和弹性体与替代清洗剂的相容性试验程序和结果

J. Yellow
{"title":"塑料和弹性体与替代清洗剂的相容性试验程序和结果","authors":"J. Yellow","doi":"10.1109/ECTC.1990.122198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low-ozone-depleting cleaning agents are being developed to replace chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-based solvents for electronics cleaning. In general, the alternative cleaning agents are chemically more aggressive than the conventional CFC-113 blends. Manufacturers of electronic components should therefore be concerned about the compatibility of the polymeric construction materials they choose to use in their parts. The author presents the compatibility testing procedures used by a cleaning-agent supplier to screen alternative candidates, and the effects of different types of alternative cleaning agents on various classes of plastics and elastomers. It is noted that the alternative cleaning agents are less forgiving toward various plastics and elastomers, especially the optical plastics (polycarbonate and acrylic) and the traditional sealing elastomers (Buna N, polychloroprene, and Viton A). Compatibility testing is easy to perform, and component manufacturers are encouraged to carry out similar tests to evaluate the potential impact of alternative cleaning agents on their particular products.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":102875,"journal":{"name":"40th Conference Proceedings on Electronic Components and Technology","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compatibility testing procedures and results for plastics and elastomers used with alternative cleaning agents\",\"authors\":\"J. Yellow\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ECTC.1990.122198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Low-ozone-depleting cleaning agents are being developed to replace chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-based solvents for electronics cleaning. In general, the alternative cleaning agents are chemically more aggressive than the conventional CFC-113 blends. Manufacturers of electronic components should therefore be concerned about the compatibility of the polymeric construction materials they choose to use in their parts. The author presents the compatibility testing procedures used by a cleaning-agent supplier to screen alternative candidates, and the effects of different types of alternative cleaning agents on various classes of plastics and elastomers. It is noted that the alternative cleaning agents are less forgiving toward various plastics and elastomers, especially the optical plastics (polycarbonate and acrylic) and the traditional sealing elastomers (Buna N, polychloroprene, and Viton A). Compatibility testing is easy to perform, and component manufacturers are encouraged to carry out similar tests to evaluate the potential impact of alternative cleaning agents on their particular products.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":102875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"40th Conference Proceedings on Electronic Components and Technology\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"40th Conference Proceedings on Electronic Components and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.1990.122198\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"40th Conference Proceedings on Electronic Components and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.1990.122198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

人们正在开发低臭氧消耗清洗剂,以取代氯氟烃(CFC)为基础的溶剂,用于电子产品的清洁。一般来说,替代清洗剂在化学上比传统的CFC-113混合物更具侵蚀性。因此,电子元件制造商应该关注他们选择在其部件中使用的聚合物结构材料的兼容性。作者介绍了清洗剂供应商用于筛选备选产品的相容性测试程序,以及不同类型的备选清洗剂对各种塑料和弹性体的影响。值得注意的是,替代清洗剂对各种塑料和弹性体的宽容程度较低,特别是光学塑料(聚碳酸酯和丙烯酸)和传统密封弹性体(丁腈橡胶、氯丁橡胶和Viton A)。兼容性测试很容易执行,并且鼓励组件制造商进行类似的测试,以评估替代清洗剂对其特定产品的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Compatibility testing procedures and results for plastics and elastomers used with alternative cleaning agents
Low-ozone-depleting cleaning agents are being developed to replace chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-based solvents for electronics cleaning. In general, the alternative cleaning agents are chemically more aggressive than the conventional CFC-113 blends. Manufacturers of electronic components should therefore be concerned about the compatibility of the polymeric construction materials they choose to use in their parts. The author presents the compatibility testing procedures used by a cleaning-agent supplier to screen alternative candidates, and the effects of different types of alternative cleaning agents on various classes of plastics and elastomers. It is noted that the alternative cleaning agents are less forgiving toward various plastics and elastomers, especially the optical plastics (polycarbonate and acrylic) and the traditional sealing elastomers (Buna N, polychloroprene, and Viton A). Compatibility testing is easy to perform, and component manufacturers are encouraged to carry out similar tests to evaluate the potential impact of alternative cleaning agents on their particular products.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信