健康社会教育:研究突发性指标

A. Ahrens, O. Purvinis, J. Zaščerinska, N. Andreeva
{"title":"健康社会教育:研究突发性指标","authors":"A. Ahrens, O. Purvinis, J. Zaščerinska, N. Andreeva","doi":"10.15181/ATEE.V1I0.1315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Education for health society attracts more and more research efforts as it facilitates the quality of society’s life. However, research on education for health society is of bursty nature. The phenomenon of burstiness is of particular research interest as it influences the flow of a number of processes including research and the quality of society’s life in general. Research question : What are indicators of burstiness in research? Approach: Interdisciplinary research was applied to the study of the meaning of the key concepts of burstiness, criteria, indicators and research . Moreover, the analysis demonstrates how the key concepts are related to the idea of education for health society and shows how the steps of the process are related following a logical chain: theoretical framework → empirical study → conclusions. Experiment: Qualitative study was applied for empirical analysis. The empirical study was carried out in February 2016. Conclusion: The theoretical findings on the inter-relationship between burstiness and gap processes allow determining the indicators of burstiness of research. The empirical findings of the research allow drawing the conclusions on a high level of research burstiness. A newly formulated research question is presented. Further research directions are proposed. KEY WORDS: Research, burstiness, criteria, indicators, interdisciplinary research. DOI:  http://dx.doi.org/ 10.15181//atee.v1i0.1315","PeriodicalId":409755,"journal":{"name":"Education in a Changing Society","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EDUCATION FOR HEALTH SOCIETY: INDICATORS OF BURSTINESS IN RESEARCH\",\"authors\":\"A. Ahrens, O. Purvinis, J. Zaščerinska, N. Andreeva\",\"doi\":\"10.15181/ATEE.V1I0.1315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Education for health society attracts more and more research efforts as it facilitates the quality of society’s life. However, research on education for health society is of bursty nature. The phenomenon of burstiness is of particular research interest as it influences the flow of a number of processes including research and the quality of society’s life in general. Research question : What are indicators of burstiness in research? Approach: Interdisciplinary research was applied to the study of the meaning of the key concepts of burstiness, criteria, indicators and research . Moreover, the analysis demonstrates how the key concepts are related to the idea of education for health society and shows how the steps of the process are related following a logical chain: theoretical framework → empirical study → conclusions. Experiment: Qualitative study was applied for empirical analysis. The empirical study was carried out in February 2016. Conclusion: The theoretical findings on the inter-relationship between burstiness and gap processes allow determining the indicators of burstiness of research. The empirical findings of the research allow drawing the conclusions on a high level of research burstiness. A newly formulated research question is presented. Further research directions are proposed. KEY WORDS: Research, burstiness, criteria, indicators, interdisciplinary research. DOI:  http://dx.doi.org/ 10.15181//atee.v1i0.1315\",\"PeriodicalId\":409755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education in a Changing Society\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education in a Changing Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15181/ATEE.V1I0.1315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education in a Changing Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15181/ATEE.V1I0.1315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:健康社会教育因其促进了社会生活质量的提高而吸引了越来越多的研究。然而,健康社会教育的研究具有突发性。爆炸现象是一个特别值得研究的问题,因为它影响了包括研究和一般社会生活质量在内的许多过程的流动。研究问题:研究中的突发性指标是什么?方法:采用跨学科研究的方法,研究突发性、标准、指标和研究等关键概念的含义。此外,分析还显示了关键概念如何与健康社会教育理念相关联,并显示了该过程的步骤如何遵循逻辑链:理论框架→实证研究→结论。实验:采用定性研究进行实证分析。实证研究于2016年2月进行。结论:对突发性与间隙过程相互关系的理论发现,可以确定研究突发性的指标。本研究的实证结果使结论具有较高的研究突发性。提出了一个新的研究问题。提出了进一步的研究方向。关键词:研究;突发性;标准;DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.15181//atee.v1i0.1315
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EDUCATION FOR HEALTH SOCIETY: INDICATORS OF BURSTINESS IN RESEARCH
Background: Education for health society attracts more and more research efforts as it facilitates the quality of society’s life. However, research on education for health society is of bursty nature. The phenomenon of burstiness is of particular research interest as it influences the flow of a number of processes including research and the quality of society’s life in general. Research question : What are indicators of burstiness in research? Approach: Interdisciplinary research was applied to the study of the meaning of the key concepts of burstiness, criteria, indicators and research . Moreover, the analysis demonstrates how the key concepts are related to the idea of education for health society and shows how the steps of the process are related following a logical chain: theoretical framework → empirical study → conclusions. Experiment: Qualitative study was applied for empirical analysis. The empirical study was carried out in February 2016. Conclusion: The theoretical findings on the inter-relationship between burstiness and gap processes allow determining the indicators of burstiness of research. The empirical findings of the research allow drawing the conclusions on a high level of research burstiness. A newly formulated research question is presented. Further research directions are proposed. KEY WORDS: Research, burstiness, criteria, indicators, interdisciplinary research. DOI:  http://dx.doi.org/ 10.15181//atee.v1i0.1315
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信