环境项目中经济与社会因素的平衡

A. Gordova, N. M. Tverdynin, L. R. Sharifullina, O. A. Tikhonova, N. I. Grishakina
{"title":"环境项目中经济与社会因素的平衡","authors":"A. Gordova, N. M. Tverdynin, L. R. Sharifullina, O. A. Tikhonova, N. I. Grishakina","doi":"10.2991/aebmr.k.220208.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With a more than significant interest in environmental issues in society and the widespread introduction of environmental themes in the social and educational space, a number of methodological and methodical problems remain unresolved. These problems are connected, on the one hand, with comparative assessments of environmental measures, taking into account both their ecological significance and economic viability, and, on the other hand, they relate to building a system of priorities in the presentation of material reflecting the realities of environmental policy in the study of ecology at different levels of education and in different subject areas. The article discusses methodological approaches and model ideas for assessing the viability of economic investments in environmental activities, taking into account both social and economic factors. Approaches to the description of the relationship of scientific and technological parameters with the formation of conditions for the economically profitable introduction of new technologies, when the need to solve environmental problems is a stimulating factor, have been considered, and the concept of an Economic and Environmental Barrier reflecting the level at which old technological solutions, although they satisfy technological requirements, but no longer meet environmental requirements is introduced. It is shown that, other things being equal, the economic component is to dominate over the environmental one when making decisions on financial investments in environmental projects. However, mobilizing public opinion in support of environmental initiatives can change attitudes towards assessing the economic viability of projects related to environmental protection. This especially applies to public funding of environmental initiatives, including in the field of environmental education. At the same time, an assumption is made about the significant dependence of the perception of scientific and popular scientific information on ecology on the level of social protection of the population and the level of its economic well-being. The authors suggest that the multifactorial nature of environmental parameters requires new approaches to environmental awareness-raising, causing a broader understanding of intersubject interaction with noxological and medical rehabilitation topics.","PeriodicalId":237433,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference Strategy of Development of Regional Ecosystems “Education-Science-Industry” (ISPCR 2021)","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balance of Economic and Social Factors in Environmental Projects\",\"authors\":\"A. Gordova, N. M. Tverdynin, L. R. Sharifullina, O. A. Tikhonova, N. I. Grishakina\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/aebmr.k.220208.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With a more than significant interest in environmental issues in society and the widespread introduction of environmental themes in the social and educational space, a number of methodological and methodical problems remain unresolved. These problems are connected, on the one hand, with comparative assessments of environmental measures, taking into account both their ecological significance and economic viability, and, on the other hand, they relate to building a system of priorities in the presentation of material reflecting the realities of environmental policy in the study of ecology at different levels of education and in different subject areas. The article discusses methodological approaches and model ideas for assessing the viability of economic investments in environmental activities, taking into account both social and economic factors. Approaches to the description of the relationship of scientific and technological parameters with the formation of conditions for the economically profitable introduction of new technologies, when the need to solve environmental problems is a stimulating factor, have been considered, and the concept of an Economic and Environmental Barrier reflecting the level at which old technological solutions, although they satisfy technological requirements, but no longer meet environmental requirements is introduced. It is shown that, other things being equal, the economic component is to dominate over the environmental one when making decisions on financial investments in environmental projects. However, mobilizing public opinion in support of environmental initiatives can change attitudes towards assessing the economic viability of projects related to environmental protection. This especially applies to public funding of environmental initiatives, including in the field of environmental education. At the same time, an assumption is made about the significant dependence of the perception of scientific and popular scientific information on ecology on the level of social protection of the population and the level of its economic well-being. The authors suggest that the multifactorial nature of environmental parameters requires new approaches to environmental awareness-raising, causing a broader understanding of intersubject interaction with noxological and medical rehabilitation topics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":237433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference Strategy of Development of Regional Ecosystems “Education-Science-Industry” (ISPCR 2021)\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference Strategy of Development of Regional Ecosystems “Education-Science-Industry” (ISPCR 2021)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220208.024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference Strategy of Development of Regional Ecosystems “Education-Science-Industry” (ISPCR 2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220208.024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着社会对环境问题的极大兴趣以及在社会和教育领域广泛引入环境主题,一些方法和方法问题仍未得到解决。这些问题一方面与考虑到其生态意义和经济可行性的环境措施的比较评估有关,另一方面与在不同教育水平和不同学科领域的生态学研究中,在提出反映环境政策现实的材料方面建立一个优先系统有关。本文讨论了在考虑到社会和经济因素的情况下,评估环境活动中经济投资可行性的方法方法和模型思想。在解决环境问题的需要是一个刺激因素的情况下,对科学和技术参数与形成在经济上有利地采用新技术的条件之间的关系的描述方法进行了考虑,并考虑了经济和环境障碍的概念,反映了旧技术解决办法虽然满足技术要求,但在何种程度上,但已不再符合环保要求。研究表明,在其他条件相同的情况下,在环境项目金融投资决策中,经济因素占主导地位。但是,动员公众舆论支持环境倡议可以改变对评估与环境保护有关的项目的经济可行性的态度。这尤其适用于为环境倡议提供公共资金,包括在环境教育领域。同时,对科学和大众科学信息对生态的感知对人口的社会保护水平及其经济福利水平的重大依赖作出了假设。作者认为,环境参数的多因素性质需要新的方法来提高环境意识,从而更广泛地了解与病毒学和医学康复主题的学科间相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Balance of Economic and Social Factors in Environmental Projects
With a more than significant interest in environmental issues in society and the widespread introduction of environmental themes in the social and educational space, a number of methodological and methodical problems remain unresolved. These problems are connected, on the one hand, with comparative assessments of environmental measures, taking into account both their ecological significance and economic viability, and, on the other hand, they relate to building a system of priorities in the presentation of material reflecting the realities of environmental policy in the study of ecology at different levels of education and in different subject areas. The article discusses methodological approaches and model ideas for assessing the viability of economic investments in environmental activities, taking into account both social and economic factors. Approaches to the description of the relationship of scientific and technological parameters with the formation of conditions for the economically profitable introduction of new technologies, when the need to solve environmental problems is a stimulating factor, have been considered, and the concept of an Economic and Environmental Barrier reflecting the level at which old technological solutions, although they satisfy technological requirements, but no longer meet environmental requirements is introduced. It is shown that, other things being equal, the economic component is to dominate over the environmental one when making decisions on financial investments in environmental projects. However, mobilizing public opinion in support of environmental initiatives can change attitudes towards assessing the economic viability of projects related to environmental protection. This especially applies to public funding of environmental initiatives, including in the field of environmental education. At the same time, an assumption is made about the significant dependence of the perception of scientific and popular scientific information on ecology on the level of social protection of the population and the level of its economic well-being. The authors suggest that the multifactorial nature of environmental parameters requires new approaches to environmental awareness-raising, causing a broader understanding of intersubject interaction with noxological and medical rehabilitation topics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信