合规、薪酬和企业不当行为

Karl Hofstetter, Eugene F. Soltes, Reinier H. Kraakman
{"title":"合规、薪酬和企业不当行为","authors":"Karl Hofstetter, Eugene F. Soltes, Reinier H. Kraakman","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3373718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerous high profile cases across industries and jurisdictions, including Wells Fargo, Siemens, Volkswagen, BP or Google, indicate that legal compliance remains a significant corporate governance challenge around the world. Ever increasing fines have become the standard response to all types of misconduct by corporations and their agents. Are they the appropriate answer to the compliance challenge? Are there superiour ways to rein in corporations? What can academic research contribute to this debate? An international Roundtable among academics, regulators and practitioners, which was organized at Harvard Law School in May 2018, discussed these and several related questions. The conclusions from this debate suggest a three-pronged way forward: (i) Companies need to keep finetuning their compliance organizations and toolkits by, e.g., systematically measuring the effectiveness of compliance efforts and specifically linking compensation policies to compliance; (ii) regulators and prosecutors need to give more weight to incentivizing corporate compliance around the world by, e.g., adding a properly-designed compliance defense to their fining policies; and (iii) academics need to put compliance as a serious topic on their research agendas with a view to developing meaningful guidance to companies and governments, as they have been doing for some time in other corporate governance areas.","PeriodicalId":215232,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Organizations & Markets: Motivation & Incentives (Topic)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compliance, Compensation and Corporate Wrongdoing\",\"authors\":\"Karl Hofstetter, Eugene F. Soltes, Reinier H. Kraakman\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3373718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Numerous high profile cases across industries and jurisdictions, including Wells Fargo, Siemens, Volkswagen, BP or Google, indicate that legal compliance remains a significant corporate governance challenge around the world. Ever increasing fines have become the standard response to all types of misconduct by corporations and their agents. Are they the appropriate answer to the compliance challenge? Are there superiour ways to rein in corporations? What can academic research contribute to this debate? An international Roundtable among academics, regulators and practitioners, which was organized at Harvard Law School in May 2018, discussed these and several related questions. The conclusions from this debate suggest a three-pronged way forward: (i) Companies need to keep finetuning their compliance organizations and toolkits by, e.g., systematically measuring the effectiveness of compliance efforts and specifically linking compensation policies to compliance; (ii) regulators and prosecutors need to give more weight to incentivizing corporate compliance around the world by, e.g., adding a properly-designed compliance defense to their fining policies; and (iii) academics need to put compliance as a serious topic on their research agendas with a view to developing meaningful guidance to companies and governments, as they have been doing for some time in other corporate governance areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":215232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Organizations & Markets: Motivation & Incentives (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Organizations & Markets: Motivation & Incentives (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3373718\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Organizations & Markets: Motivation & Incentives (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3373718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

富国银行(Wells Fargo)、西门子(Siemens)、大众汽车(Volkswagen)、英国石油(BP)或谷歌(Google)等行业和司法管辖区的众多引人注目的案例表明,法律合规仍是全球各地公司治理面临的重大挑战。不断增加的罚款已成为对企业及其代理人各种不当行为的标准回应。它们是应对遵从性挑战的合适答案吗?有没有更好的方法来控制公司?学术研究能为这场辩论做出什么贡献?2018年5月,哈佛法学院组织了一次由学者、监管机构和从业者参加的国际圆桌会议,讨论了这些问题和几个相关问题。这场辩论的结论提出了三管齐下的前进道路:(i)公司需要不断调整其合规组织和工具包,例如系统地衡量合规工作的有效性,并具体地将薪酬政策与合规联系起来;(ii)监管机构和检察官需要更加重视激励世界各地的公司合规,例如,在其罚款政策中添加适当设计的合规辩护;(iii)学者们需要将合规作为一个严肃的主题纳入他们的研究议程,以期为企业和政府提供有意义的指导,就像他们在其他公司治理领域所做的那样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Compliance, Compensation and Corporate Wrongdoing
Numerous high profile cases across industries and jurisdictions, including Wells Fargo, Siemens, Volkswagen, BP or Google, indicate that legal compliance remains a significant corporate governance challenge around the world. Ever increasing fines have become the standard response to all types of misconduct by corporations and their agents. Are they the appropriate answer to the compliance challenge? Are there superiour ways to rein in corporations? What can academic research contribute to this debate? An international Roundtable among academics, regulators and practitioners, which was organized at Harvard Law School in May 2018, discussed these and several related questions. The conclusions from this debate suggest a three-pronged way forward: (i) Companies need to keep finetuning their compliance organizations and toolkits by, e.g., systematically measuring the effectiveness of compliance efforts and specifically linking compensation policies to compliance; (ii) regulators and prosecutors need to give more weight to incentivizing corporate compliance around the world by, e.g., adding a properly-designed compliance defense to their fining policies; and (iii) academics need to put compliance as a serious topic on their research agendas with a view to developing meaningful guidance to companies and governments, as they have been doing for some time in other corporate governance areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信