比较学生和教授对在远程学习中使用论坛和聊天的印象

Henrique Lemos dos Santos, C. Cechinel
{"title":"比较学生和教授对在远程学习中使用论坛和聊天的印象","authors":"Henrique Lemos dos Santos, C. Cechinel","doi":"10.1109/LACLO.2017.8120914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the main issues related to the online distance learning courses is the method employed in order to connect students and professors. Two main forms of communication are normally chosen (or combined): synchronous and asynchronous. This paper aims to analyze the impressions of students and professors about the usage of both methods of communication on the specific context of Final Year Project discipline. A survey containing questions based on the three main constructs of the Technology Acceptance Model was applied for both groups of stakeholders (students and their supervisors). The survey aimed to identify impressions and preferences of those groups for one form of communication over the other. It was possible to observe that asynchronous communication (forum discussions) was highly rated by both groups in comparison to synchronous communication(chat discussions). At the same time, it is important to highlight that synchronous communication also obtained good ratings, indicating that the combination of both methods is well suited and complementary for this particular scenario.","PeriodicalId":278097,"journal":{"name":"2017 Twelfth Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies (LACLO)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing students and professors impressions about the use of forums and chats during a distance learning discipline\",\"authors\":\"Henrique Lemos dos Santos, C. Cechinel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LACLO.2017.8120914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the main issues related to the online distance learning courses is the method employed in order to connect students and professors. Two main forms of communication are normally chosen (or combined): synchronous and asynchronous. This paper aims to analyze the impressions of students and professors about the usage of both methods of communication on the specific context of Final Year Project discipline. A survey containing questions based on the three main constructs of the Technology Acceptance Model was applied for both groups of stakeholders (students and their supervisors). The survey aimed to identify impressions and preferences of those groups for one form of communication over the other. It was possible to observe that asynchronous communication (forum discussions) was highly rated by both groups in comparison to synchronous communication(chat discussions). At the same time, it is important to highlight that synchronous communication also obtained good ratings, indicating that the combination of both methods is well suited and complementary for this particular scenario.\",\"PeriodicalId\":278097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 Twelfth Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies (LACLO)\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 Twelfth Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies (LACLO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LACLO.2017.8120914\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Twelfth Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies (LACLO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LACLO.2017.8120914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

与在线远程学习课程相关的主要问题之一是采用连接学生和教授的方法。通常选择(或组合)两种主要的通信形式:同步和异步。本文旨在分析在Final Year Project学科的具体背景下,学生和教授对这两种交流方式的使用印象。一项包含基于技术接受模型的三个主要结构的问题的调查应用于两组利益相关者(学生和他们的导师)。这项调查旨在确定这些群体对一种交流方式的印象和偏好。可以观察到,与同步交流(聊天讨论)相比,两组人对异步交流(论坛讨论)的评价都很高。同时,重要的是要强调,同步通信也获得了良好的评级,这表明两种方法的组合非常适合并互补于此特定场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing students and professors impressions about the use of forums and chats during a distance learning discipline
One of the main issues related to the online distance learning courses is the method employed in order to connect students and professors. Two main forms of communication are normally chosen (or combined): synchronous and asynchronous. This paper aims to analyze the impressions of students and professors about the usage of both methods of communication on the specific context of Final Year Project discipline. A survey containing questions based on the three main constructs of the Technology Acceptance Model was applied for both groups of stakeholders (students and their supervisors). The survey aimed to identify impressions and preferences of those groups for one form of communication over the other. It was possible to observe that asynchronous communication (forum discussions) was highly rated by both groups in comparison to synchronous communication(chat discussions). At the same time, it is important to highlight that synchronous communication also obtained good ratings, indicating that the combination of both methods is well suited and complementary for this particular scenario.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信