文化-工业创意作为当代艺术的生物-死亡政治的跨学科批判

Maryna Protas
{"title":"文化-工业创意作为当代艺术的生物-死亡政治的跨学科批判","authors":"Maryna Protas","doi":"10.31500/1992-5514.18(1).2022.260421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the turn of the 21st century there have been debates about the condition and future development of art theories and visual practices that acquired the status of global contemporary product in a post-Fordist society of quasi-consumption, when cultural-industrial ideology of transnational art market conquers the creative intentions of artists, transforming the artist, and his work on the product. An important aspect of this discussion is the problem of biopower, which determines the necropolitical paradigm of contemporary culture, depriving the absolute freedom of creativity by instilling servile commodified consciousness, manipulating the imagination in favor of art business, spreading across public globalized art space re-reified patterns. Dominant in the field of popularization of contemporary art, private capital denies adherents of transcendental aesthetics the right to freedom of expression outside the recognized brands legitimized by the World Biennale events. The anarchy of consumerism contributes to the eschatological predictions of the death of art and art criticism, the end of art history, the final annihilation of traditional art life through the socio-political turn of performative activism. Still, interdisciplinary critique, based on the theory of catastrophes, offers another way out of cultural entropy: transcendental aesthetics’ experience and judgment’srecycling as a way to overcome the hysteresis of art theories and practices.","PeriodicalId":440942,"journal":{"name":"Artistic Culture Topical Issues","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interdisciplinary Critique of Cultural-Industrial Creativity as a Bio-Necropolitics of Contemporary art\",\"authors\":\"Maryna Protas\",\"doi\":\"10.31500/1992-5514.18(1).2022.260421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the turn of the 21st century there have been debates about the condition and future development of art theories and visual practices that acquired the status of global contemporary product in a post-Fordist society of quasi-consumption, when cultural-industrial ideology of transnational art market conquers the creative intentions of artists, transforming the artist, and his work on the product. An important aspect of this discussion is the problem of biopower, which determines the necropolitical paradigm of contemporary culture, depriving the absolute freedom of creativity by instilling servile commodified consciousness, manipulating the imagination in favor of art business, spreading across public globalized art space re-reified patterns. Dominant in the field of popularization of contemporary art, private capital denies adherents of transcendental aesthetics the right to freedom of expression outside the recognized brands legitimized by the World Biennale events. The anarchy of consumerism contributes to the eschatological predictions of the death of art and art criticism, the end of art history, the final annihilation of traditional art life through the socio-political turn of performative activism. Still, interdisciplinary critique, based on the theory of catastrophes, offers another way out of cultural entropy: transcendental aesthetics’ experience and judgment’srecycling as a way to overcome the hysteresis of art theories and practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":440942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artistic Culture Topical Issues\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artistic Culture Topical Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31500/1992-5514.18(1).2022.260421\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artistic Culture Topical Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31500/1992-5514.18(1).2022.260421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

进入21世纪以来,关于在一个后福特主义的准消费社会中获得全球当代产品地位的艺术理论和视觉实践的状况和未来发展一直存在争论,跨国艺术市场的文化工业意识形态征服了艺术家的创作意图,改变了艺术家及其对产品的工作。这一讨论的一个重要方面是生命权力问题,它决定了当代文化的死亡政治范式,通过灌输奴性的商品化意识,操纵想象力以有利于艺术商业,在公共全球化艺术空间中传播重新物化的模式,剥夺了创造力的绝对自由。私人资本在当代艺术的大众化领域占据主导地位,在世界双年展活动合法化的公认品牌之外,否认了先验美学的追随者的言论自由权利。消费主义的无政府状态有助于艺术和艺术批评死亡的末世论预言,艺术史的终结,通过表演行动主义的社会政治转向,传统艺术生活的最终湮灭。然而,基于灾难理论的跨学科批判提供了另一种走出文化熵的方式:先验美学的经验和判断的循环,作为克服艺术理论和实践滞后性的一种方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interdisciplinary Critique of Cultural-Industrial Creativity as a Bio-Necropolitics of Contemporary art
Since the turn of the 21st century there have been debates about the condition and future development of art theories and visual practices that acquired the status of global contemporary product in a post-Fordist society of quasi-consumption, when cultural-industrial ideology of transnational art market conquers the creative intentions of artists, transforming the artist, and his work on the product. An important aspect of this discussion is the problem of biopower, which determines the necropolitical paradigm of contemporary culture, depriving the absolute freedom of creativity by instilling servile commodified consciousness, manipulating the imagination in favor of art business, spreading across public globalized art space re-reified patterns. Dominant in the field of popularization of contemporary art, private capital denies adherents of transcendental aesthetics the right to freedom of expression outside the recognized brands legitimized by the World Biennale events. The anarchy of consumerism contributes to the eschatological predictions of the death of art and art criticism, the end of art history, the final annihilation of traditional art life through the socio-political turn of performative activism. Still, interdisciplinary critique, based on the theory of catastrophes, offers another way out of cultural entropy: transcendental aesthetics’ experience and judgment’srecycling as a way to overcome the hysteresis of art theories and practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信