{"title":"一种适合家庭使用的新型尿动力学测量电容式方法","authors":"G. Nikolić, I. But, A. Stožer, I. Kramberger","doi":"10.18690/actabiomed.195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Urinary incontinence is highly prevalent in both women and men. Urodynamic testing is essential for diagnosis, but a gap exists in the usefulness of simple assessments that do not provide sufficient data, and devices that provide the necessary data, but are used primarily in clinics and clinical trials. This study considered the existing methods of urodynamics testing and developed a device that was both effective and suitable for home use. \nMethods: A review of existing urodynamic methods led to development of a capacitive device. We created a device with sensor electrodes placed on the outside of a specimen container. The functionality of the electrodes and performance of the novel capacitive device were compared with that of a gravimetric device (Dorado KT, Laborie Medical Technologies, Mississauga, ON, Canada) used at the University Clinical Center, Maribor. \nResults: Measurements of fluid volume (p = 0.936), maximum (p = 0.327), and mean (p = 0.136) flow observed with the two devices were not significantly different. Graphical analysis of collected volumes and flow variation over time show a high degree of overlap. \nConclusion: Compared with previously developed urodynamics testing devices, the capacitance method and the performance of this device represent an advance. The precision of the measurements needs improvement and did not fully address the recommendations of the International Continence Society, but he use of additional sensor electrodes is expected to improve performance. Extending the functionality as a standalone capacitive device for home use and upgrading with wireless access by mobile systems would allow for additional benefits beyond current voiding diaries.","PeriodicalId":186880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medico-Biotechnica","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel Capacitive Method for Urodynamic Measurements That is Suitable for Home Use\",\"authors\":\"G. Nikolić, I. But, A. Stožer, I. Kramberger\",\"doi\":\"10.18690/actabiomed.195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Urinary incontinence is highly prevalent in both women and men. Urodynamic testing is essential for diagnosis, but a gap exists in the usefulness of simple assessments that do not provide sufficient data, and devices that provide the necessary data, but are used primarily in clinics and clinical trials. This study considered the existing methods of urodynamics testing and developed a device that was both effective and suitable for home use. \\nMethods: A review of existing urodynamic methods led to development of a capacitive device. We created a device with sensor electrodes placed on the outside of a specimen container. The functionality of the electrodes and performance of the novel capacitive device were compared with that of a gravimetric device (Dorado KT, Laborie Medical Technologies, Mississauga, ON, Canada) used at the University Clinical Center, Maribor. \\nResults: Measurements of fluid volume (p = 0.936), maximum (p = 0.327), and mean (p = 0.136) flow observed with the two devices were not significantly different. Graphical analysis of collected volumes and flow variation over time show a high degree of overlap. \\nConclusion: Compared with previously developed urodynamics testing devices, the capacitance method and the performance of this device represent an advance. The precision of the measurements needs improvement and did not fully address the recommendations of the International Continence Society, but he use of additional sensor electrodes is expected to improve performance. Extending the functionality as a standalone capacitive device for home use and upgrading with wireless access by mobile systems would allow for additional benefits beyond current voiding diaries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Medico-Biotechnica\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Medico-Biotechnica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18690/actabiomed.195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medico-Biotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18690/actabiomed.195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:尿失禁在男性和女性中都是非常普遍的。尿动力学检测对诊断至关重要,但在不能提供足够数据的简单评估和提供必要数据的设备方面存在差距,但主要用于临床和临床试验。本研究考虑了现有的尿动力学测试方法,并开发了一种既有效又适合家庭使用的设备。方法:回顾现有的尿动力学方法,开发一种电容装置。我们创造了一个装置,将传感器电极放置在标本容器的外面。将新型电容装置的电极功能和性能与Maribor大学临床中心使用的重力装置(Dorado KT, Laborie Medical Technologies, Mississauga, ON, Canada)进行了比较。结果:两种装置测量的流体体积(p = 0.936)、最大(p = 0.327)和平均(p = 0.136)流量无显著差异。收集的体积和流量随时间变化的图形分析显示高度重叠。结论:与以往研制的尿动力学检测装置相比,该装置的电容法和性能都有较大的进步。测量的精度需要提高,并没有完全满足国际自制学会的建议,但使用额外的传感器电极有望提高性能。将其功能扩展为家庭使用的独立电容式设备,并通过移动系统升级无线接入,将带来比当前排尿日记更多的好处。
A Novel Capacitive Method for Urodynamic Measurements That is Suitable for Home Use
Purpose: Urinary incontinence is highly prevalent in both women and men. Urodynamic testing is essential for diagnosis, but a gap exists in the usefulness of simple assessments that do not provide sufficient data, and devices that provide the necessary data, but are used primarily in clinics and clinical trials. This study considered the existing methods of urodynamics testing and developed a device that was both effective and suitable for home use.
Methods: A review of existing urodynamic methods led to development of a capacitive device. We created a device with sensor electrodes placed on the outside of a specimen container. The functionality of the electrodes and performance of the novel capacitive device were compared with that of a gravimetric device (Dorado KT, Laborie Medical Technologies, Mississauga, ON, Canada) used at the University Clinical Center, Maribor.
Results: Measurements of fluid volume (p = 0.936), maximum (p = 0.327), and mean (p = 0.136) flow observed with the two devices were not significantly different. Graphical analysis of collected volumes and flow variation over time show a high degree of overlap.
Conclusion: Compared with previously developed urodynamics testing devices, the capacitance method and the performance of this device represent an advance. The precision of the measurements needs improvement and did not fully address the recommendations of the International Continence Society, but he use of additional sensor electrodes is expected to improve performance. Extending the functionality as a standalone capacitive device for home use and upgrading with wireless access by mobile systems would allow for additional benefits beyond current voiding diaries.