可持续发展的集体行动理论与强迫理论的比较分析

Lila Prasad Limbu
{"title":"可持续发展的集体行动理论与强迫理论的比较分析","authors":"Lila Prasad Limbu","doi":"10.3126/hssj.v13i1.44565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper has been drawn by taking the following objectives: To review the prevention policies and plans of COVID-19. (ii) To fulfill the gap between the collective action and the Compulsion theory of sustainability. The researcher has used a descriptive research design because he has collected only secondary data from books, journal articles, policies, and reports from different websites. After analyzing those data, the researcher found that all countries' prevention policies are the same. Some Asian countries like Japan, China, and South Korea firmly created the compulsion on ordinary people, health institutions, government authority, and other stakeholders can control COVID-19. On the other hand, some European like Italy, France, and Germany could not create strong compulsion; they could not hold COVID-19. Hence, compulsion is necessary for making plans and policies to get success. In addition, the researcher did not examine the human ecological and environmental aspects.","PeriodicalId":103345,"journal":{"name":"Humanities and Social Sciences Journal","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Analysis between Collective Action Theory and Compulsion Theory of Sustainability\",\"authors\":\"Lila Prasad Limbu\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/hssj.v13i1.44565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper has been drawn by taking the following objectives: To review the prevention policies and plans of COVID-19. (ii) To fulfill the gap between the collective action and the Compulsion theory of sustainability. The researcher has used a descriptive research design because he has collected only secondary data from books, journal articles, policies, and reports from different websites. After analyzing those data, the researcher found that all countries' prevention policies are the same. Some Asian countries like Japan, China, and South Korea firmly created the compulsion on ordinary people, health institutions, government authority, and other stakeholders can control COVID-19. On the other hand, some European like Italy, France, and Germany could not create strong compulsion; they could not hold COVID-19. Hence, compulsion is necessary for making plans and policies to get success. In addition, the researcher did not examine the human ecological and environmental aspects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":103345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Humanities and Social Sciences Journal\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Humanities and Social Sciences Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/hssj.v13i1.44565\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanities and Social Sciences Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/hssj.v13i1.44565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

撰写本文的目的如下:审查新冠肺炎的预防政策和计划。(二)填补集体行动理论与可持续性强迫理论之间的空白。研究者使用了描述性研究设计,因为他只收集了来自不同网站的书籍、期刊文章、政策和报告的二手数据。在分析了这些数据后,研究人员发现所有国家的预防政策都是一样的。日本、中国、韩国等一些亚洲国家坚决要求普通民众、卫生机构、政府当局和其他利益相关者能够控制COVID-19。另一方面,一些欧洲国家,如意大利、法国和德国,无法形成强大的强制;他们无法控制COVID-19。因此,强迫是制定计划和政策以获得成功的必要条件。此外,研究人员没有研究人类生态和环境方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Analysis between Collective Action Theory and Compulsion Theory of Sustainability
This paper has been drawn by taking the following objectives: To review the prevention policies and plans of COVID-19. (ii) To fulfill the gap between the collective action and the Compulsion theory of sustainability. The researcher has used a descriptive research design because he has collected only secondary data from books, journal articles, policies, and reports from different websites. After analyzing those data, the researcher found that all countries' prevention policies are the same. Some Asian countries like Japan, China, and South Korea firmly created the compulsion on ordinary people, health institutions, government authority, and other stakeholders can control COVID-19. On the other hand, some European like Italy, France, and Germany could not create strong compulsion; they could not hold COVID-19. Hence, compulsion is necessary for making plans and policies to get success. In addition, the researcher did not examine the human ecological and environmental aspects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信