再访普通零售商渠道:供应网络规模的作用

Quan Zheng, X. Pan, A. Vakharia
{"title":"再访普通零售商渠道:供应网络规模的作用","authors":"Quan Zheng, X. Pan, A. Vakharia","doi":"10.1111/poms.13220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is motivated by the ubiquitous practical existence of common retailer distribution channels (e.g., a grocery store offering multiple brands of the same product). Demand interdependence (product substitutability) among various brands is critical and thus we investigate its impact on firms’ profits. Using an economic framework with manufacturers operating as Stackelberg leaders, our analysis reveals unique and substantive insights dependent on the underlying market demand structure, and in some cases, the extent of supply coverage. For the Spence-Dixit-Vives demand structure, we find that competing manufacturers prefer to offer brands with low levels of substitutability while retailer’s preferences are moderated by the interaction effect between the number of competing brands and level of product substitutability (essentially the retailer prefers high levels of substitutability when the number of brands is “small,” and vice versa). For the Shubik-Levitan demand structure, manufacturers may prefer high or low levels of product substitutability depending on the extent of supply coverage while the retailer always prefers high levels of product substitutability. These findings offer useful prescriptions for category management and persuasive advertising.","PeriodicalId":129698,"journal":{"name":"Supply Chain Management eJournal","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Common Retailer Channel Revisited: The Role of Supply Network Size\",\"authors\":\"Quan Zheng, X. Pan, A. Vakharia\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/poms.13220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is motivated by the ubiquitous practical existence of common retailer distribution channels (e.g., a grocery store offering multiple brands of the same product). Demand interdependence (product substitutability) among various brands is critical and thus we investigate its impact on firms’ profits. Using an economic framework with manufacturers operating as Stackelberg leaders, our analysis reveals unique and substantive insights dependent on the underlying market demand structure, and in some cases, the extent of supply coverage. For the Spence-Dixit-Vives demand structure, we find that competing manufacturers prefer to offer brands with low levels of substitutability while retailer’s preferences are moderated by the interaction effect between the number of competing brands and level of product substitutability (essentially the retailer prefers high levels of substitutability when the number of brands is “small,” and vice versa). For the Shubik-Levitan demand structure, manufacturers may prefer high or low levels of product substitutability depending on the extent of supply coverage while the retailer always prefers high levels of product substitutability. These findings offer useful prescriptions for category management and persuasive advertising.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Supply Chain Management eJournal\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Supply Chain Management eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supply Chain Management eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文的动机是普遍存在的共同零售商分销渠道(例如,杂货店提供同一产品的多个品牌)。不同品牌之间的需求相互依赖(产品可替代性)是至关重要的,因此我们研究了它对公司利润的影响。通过使用制造商作为Stackelberg领导者的经济框架,我们的分析揭示了依赖于潜在市场需求结构的独特而实质性的见解,在某些情况下,供应覆盖范围。对于Spence-Dixit-Vives需求结构,我们发现竞争制造商倾向于提供可替代性水平较低的品牌,而零售商的偏好受到竞争品牌数量和产品可替代性水平之间的相互作用的调节(本质上,当品牌数量“少”时,零售商倾向于高水平的可替代性,反之亦然)。对于Shubik-Levitan需求结构,根据供应覆盖的程度,制造商可能倾向于高或低水平的产品可替代性,而零售商总是倾向于高水平的产品可替代性。这些发现为品类管理和说服性广告提供了有用的处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Common Retailer Channel Revisited: The Role of Supply Network Size
This paper is motivated by the ubiquitous practical existence of common retailer distribution channels (e.g., a grocery store offering multiple brands of the same product). Demand interdependence (product substitutability) among various brands is critical and thus we investigate its impact on firms’ profits. Using an economic framework with manufacturers operating as Stackelberg leaders, our analysis reveals unique and substantive insights dependent on the underlying market demand structure, and in some cases, the extent of supply coverage. For the Spence-Dixit-Vives demand structure, we find that competing manufacturers prefer to offer brands with low levels of substitutability while retailer’s preferences are moderated by the interaction effect between the number of competing brands and level of product substitutability (essentially the retailer prefers high levels of substitutability when the number of brands is “small,” and vice versa). For the Shubik-Levitan demand structure, manufacturers may prefer high or low levels of product substitutability depending on the extent of supply coverage while the retailer always prefers high levels of product substitutability. These findings offer useful prescriptions for category management and persuasive advertising.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信