库兹涅茨收入不平等的倒U型假设:从现有经济学文献看

A. Ganaie, B. Kamaiah
{"title":"库兹涅茨收入不平等的倒U型假设:从现有经济学文献看","authors":"A. Ganaie, B. Kamaiah","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2591284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A dynamic shift in thinking has taken place both locally as well as globally to understand the phenomenon of rising economic inequalities and accordingly find measures to correct this state of disequilibrium. However in no way the contribution of predecessors cannot be put in vain, as their work became the base to build the ongoing recent debate on the subject of economic and income inequalities. One such contribution the literature of economics received was from the seminal work of Simon Kuznets. It was the beginning to discuss the relationship between income distribution and development which later on became popular as Kuznets inverted U hypothesis or Kuznets curve. Though with respect to findings and analysis there is no common consensus to support or reject the Inverted U Hypothesis, but in its own sphere it became the base for carrying forward the research on an important aspect of the economy. In this paper we have tried mainly to show how from different perspectives the literature flowed over the period of time, to see the reliability and the efficacy of this Hypothesis. We divided the whole literature into four categories and accordingly included some important studies within each.","PeriodicalId":208075,"journal":{"name":"PRN: Distributive & Economic Justice","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kuznets Inverted U Hypothesis of Income Inequality: Looking Inside the Available Economic Literature\",\"authors\":\"A. Ganaie, B. Kamaiah\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2591284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A dynamic shift in thinking has taken place both locally as well as globally to understand the phenomenon of rising economic inequalities and accordingly find measures to correct this state of disequilibrium. However in no way the contribution of predecessors cannot be put in vain, as their work became the base to build the ongoing recent debate on the subject of economic and income inequalities. One such contribution the literature of economics received was from the seminal work of Simon Kuznets. It was the beginning to discuss the relationship between income distribution and development which later on became popular as Kuznets inverted U hypothesis or Kuznets curve. Though with respect to findings and analysis there is no common consensus to support or reject the Inverted U Hypothesis, but in its own sphere it became the base for carrying forward the research on an important aspect of the economy. In this paper we have tried mainly to show how from different perspectives the literature flowed over the period of time, to see the reliability and the efficacy of this Hypothesis. We divided the whole literature into four categories and accordingly included some important studies within each.\",\"PeriodicalId\":208075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRN: Distributive & Economic Justice\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRN: Distributive & Economic Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2591284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRN: Distributive & Economic Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2591284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在理解日益加剧的经济不平等现象,并相应地找到纠正这种不平衡状态的措施方面,地方和全球都发生了思维上的动态转变。然而,无论如何,前人的贡献是不能白费的,因为他们的工作成为了最近关于经济和收入不平等主题的持续辩论的基础。西蒙•库兹涅茨(Simon Kuznets)的开创性著作就是经济学文献的贡献之一。这是讨论收入分配与发展之间关系的开始,后来成为流行的库兹涅茨倒U假设或库兹涅茨曲线。虽然就研究结果和分析而言,支持或反对倒U假说并没有共同的共识,但在它自己的领域内,它成为了对经济的一个重要方面进行研究的基础。在本文中,我们主要试图从不同的角度展示文献是如何在一段时间内流动的,以看到这一假设的可靠性和有效性。我们将整个文献分为四类,并相应地在每一类中纳入一些重要的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kuznets Inverted U Hypothesis of Income Inequality: Looking Inside the Available Economic Literature
A dynamic shift in thinking has taken place both locally as well as globally to understand the phenomenon of rising economic inequalities and accordingly find measures to correct this state of disequilibrium. However in no way the contribution of predecessors cannot be put in vain, as their work became the base to build the ongoing recent debate on the subject of economic and income inequalities. One such contribution the literature of economics received was from the seminal work of Simon Kuznets. It was the beginning to discuss the relationship between income distribution and development which later on became popular as Kuznets inverted U hypothesis or Kuznets curve. Though with respect to findings and analysis there is no common consensus to support or reject the Inverted U Hypothesis, but in its own sphere it became the base for carrying forward the research on an important aspect of the economy. In this paper we have tried mainly to show how from different perspectives the literature flowed over the period of time, to see the reliability and the efficacy of this Hypothesis. We divided the whole literature into four categories and accordingly included some important studies within each.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信