下肢深静脉血栓无创诊断的新进展。

P Prandoni, A W Lensing
{"title":"下肢深静脉血栓无创诊断的新进展。","authors":"P Prandoni,&nbsp;A W Lensing","doi":"10.1007/BF02910144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the clinical diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limbs is nonspecific, a confirmation by objective tests is mandatory. Recently, three new simple and reproducible methods of detecting DVT have been developed: computerized impedance plethysmography, standardized Doppler ultrasound, and compression ultrasonography. In three large prospective studies including consecutive outpatients with clinically suspected DVT, these tests were blindly evaluated versus phlebography, to determine diagnostic criteria and accuracy. The sensitivity for proximal DVT was 91% for computerized impedance plethysmography, 91% for standardized Doppler ultrasound and 100% for compression ultrasonography; sensitivity for all thrombi (including calf-vein thrombi) was 86, 85 and 91%, respectively; the specificity was 94% for computerized impedance plethysmography, and 99% for both standardized Doppler ultrasound and compression ultrasonography. The results of these studies demonstrate that all the three tests are highly specific and sensitive methods for the diagnosis of proximal DVT in symptomatic outpatients. However, isolated calf thrombi could not be detected adequately. Before these simple tests can be recommended as substitutes for phlebography, the safety of withholding anticoagulant therapy in patients with repeated normal tests should be assessed.</p>","PeriodicalId":76092,"journal":{"name":"La Ricerca in clinica e in laboratorio","volume":"20 1","pages":"11-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02910144","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New developments in noninvasive diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis of the lower limbs.\",\"authors\":\"P Prandoni,&nbsp;A W Lensing\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF02910144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Since the clinical diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limbs is nonspecific, a confirmation by objective tests is mandatory. Recently, three new simple and reproducible methods of detecting DVT have been developed: computerized impedance plethysmography, standardized Doppler ultrasound, and compression ultrasonography. In three large prospective studies including consecutive outpatients with clinically suspected DVT, these tests were blindly evaluated versus phlebography, to determine diagnostic criteria and accuracy. The sensitivity for proximal DVT was 91% for computerized impedance plethysmography, 91% for standardized Doppler ultrasound and 100% for compression ultrasonography; sensitivity for all thrombi (including calf-vein thrombi) was 86, 85 and 91%, respectively; the specificity was 94% for computerized impedance plethysmography, and 99% for both standardized Doppler ultrasound and compression ultrasonography. The results of these studies demonstrate that all the three tests are highly specific and sensitive methods for the diagnosis of proximal DVT in symptomatic outpatients. However, isolated calf thrombi could not be detected adequately. Before these simple tests can be recommended as substitutes for phlebography, the safety of withholding anticoagulant therapy in patients with repeated normal tests should be assessed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"La Ricerca in clinica e in laboratorio\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"11-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02910144\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"La Ricerca in clinica e in laboratorio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02910144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"La Ricerca in clinica e in laboratorio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02910144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

由于下肢深静脉血栓形成的临床诊断是非特异性的,因此必须通过客观检查进行确认。最近,有三种新的简单且可重复的检测DVT的方法被开发出来:计算机阻抗容积描记术、标准化多普勒超声和压缩超声。在三个大型前瞻性研究中,包括连续的临床怀疑深静脉血栓的门诊患者,这些测试与静脉造影术进行了盲目评估,以确定诊断标准和准确性。计算机阻抗超声对近端DVT的敏感性为91%,标准化多普勒超声为91%,压缩超声为100%;所有血栓(包括小腿静脉血栓)的敏感性分别为86%、85%和91%;计算机阻抗超声的特异性为94%,标准化多普勒超声和压缩超声的特异性为99%。这些研究结果表明,这三种检测方法都是诊断有症状的门诊患者近端深静脉血栓的高度特异性和敏感性方法。然而,分离的小牛血栓不能充分检测。在推荐这些简单的试验作为静脉造影的替代品之前,应评估反复进行正常试验的患者不使用抗凝治疗的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New developments in noninvasive diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis of the lower limbs.

Since the clinical diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limbs is nonspecific, a confirmation by objective tests is mandatory. Recently, three new simple and reproducible methods of detecting DVT have been developed: computerized impedance plethysmography, standardized Doppler ultrasound, and compression ultrasonography. In three large prospective studies including consecutive outpatients with clinically suspected DVT, these tests were blindly evaluated versus phlebography, to determine diagnostic criteria and accuracy. The sensitivity for proximal DVT was 91% for computerized impedance plethysmography, 91% for standardized Doppler ultrasound and 100% for compression ultrasonography; sensitivity for all thrombi (including calf-vein thrombi) was 86, 85 and 91%, respectively; the specificity was 94% for computerized impedance plethysmography, and 99% for both standardized Doppler ultrasound and compression ultrasonography. The results of these studies demonstrate that all the three tests are highly specific and sensitive methods for the diagnosis of proximal DVT in symptomatic outpatients. However, isolated calf thrombi could not be detected adequately. Before these simple tests can be recommended as substitutes for phlebography, the safety of withholding anticoagulant therapy in patients with repeated normal tests should be assessed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信