他们在说什么?对Facebook上疫苗接种信息辩论的言语行为分析

Laurie J. Bonnici, Jinxuan Ma
{"title":"他们在说什么?对Facebook上疫苗接种信息辩论的言语行为分析","authors":"Laurie J. Bonnici, Jinxuan Ma","doi":"10.5206/CJILSRCSIB.V44I1.13342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The global resurgence of vaccine preventable diseases is garnering attention amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccination information debates in a Facebook group give participants access to second-hand knowledge conveying personal experiences. Through the lens of Speech Act Theory, this study analysed discourses on pro-and anti-vaccination perspectives along with views from vaccine hesitant groups. Analysis reveals significant criticism of behaviour around information. Findings indicate provision of substantiating information would play a crucial role in debate within divergent information contexts. Application of Speech Act Theory serves to inform participant communication more intimately and empowers their engagement in polarized discussion.","PeriodicalId":377680,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What are they saying? A speech act analysis of a vaccination information debate on Facebook\",\"authors\":\"Laurie J. Bonnici, Jinxuan Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.5206/CJILSRCSIB.V44I1.13342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The global resurgence of vaccine preventable diseases is garnering attention amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccination information debates in a Facebook group give participants access to second-hand knowledge conveying personal experiences. Through the lens of Speech Act Theory, this study analysed discourses on pro-and anti-vaccination perspectives along with views from vaccine hesitant groups. Analysis reveals significant criticism of behaviour around information. Findings indicate provision of substantiating information would play a crucial role in debate within divergent information contexts. Application of Speech Act Theory serves to inform participant communication more intimately and empowers their engagement in polarized discussion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":377680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5206/CJILSRCSIB.V44I1.13342\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5206/CJILSRCSIB.V44I1.13342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在COVID-19大流行期间,全球疫苗可预防疾病的死灰复燃引起了人们的关注。Facebook小组中的疫苗接种信息辩论使参与者能够获得传达个人经验的二手知识。通过言语行为理论的视角,本研究分析了支持和反对疫苗接种观点的话语以及疫苗犹豫群体的观点。分析揭示了对信息周围行为的重大批评。调查结果表明,在不同资料背景下的辩论中,提供确凿的资料将发挥关键作用。言语行为理论的应用为参与者的交流提供了更密切的信息,并使他们能够参与到两极分化的讨论中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What are they saying? A speech act analysis of a vaccination information debate on Facebook
The global resurgence of vaccine preventable diseases is garnering attention amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccination information debates in a Facebook group give participants access to second-hand knowledge conveying personal experiences. Through the lens of Speech Act Theory, this study analysed discourses on pro-and anti-vaccination perspectives along with views from vaccine hesitant groups. Analysis reveals significant criticism of behaviour around information. Findings indicate provision of substantiating information would play a crucial role in debate within divergent information contexts. Application of Speech Act Theory serves to inform participant communication more intimately and empowers their engagement in polarized discussion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信