{"title":"导论:凡尔赛和约与“通过法律实现和平”的拓展","authors":"M. Erpelding","doi":"10.5771/9783845299167-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 9 May 1919, a little more than forty-eight hours after the Allies had handed over the text of the Versailles Treaty to the representatives of Germany, a small ceremonial dinner was held at the Hôtel Bedford, in the fashionable 8th arrondissement of Paris. As one American attendee later wrote to his wife, it was a high-brow affair. The guest list included a grandnephew of Napoleon I, Prince Roland-Napoléon Bonaparte, and Albert I, Prince of Monaco. However, like their host, the British barrister and academic Sir Thomas Barclay, most of the twenty or so diners were highly regarded authorities on international law. They were also members of the Institut de Droit International (IDI), which, a few hours earlier, had concluded an extraordinary two-day session at the Ceremonial Hall of the Paris Law Faculty. All were gathered to honour the man whose ideas were profoundly changing the way people thought about international relations and international law: the President of the United States of America, Woodrow Wilson.1 The IDI had not convened since its Oxford session in August 1913—its subsequent session, meant to take place in Munich in September of the following year, had been cancelled after the summer of 1914 had ended in mobilization and war.2 Founded in 1873 as a reaction to the Franco–Prussian war of 1870–1871, the IDI had vowed to ‘promote the progress of international law’ . By declaring that they would ‘[strive] to formulate the general principles of the subject, in such a way as to correspond to the legal conscience of the civilized world’ , its members had openly challenged the monopoly of governments over international law.3 The idea that international disputes might be better resolved by legal experts rather than governements or diplomats had also been gaining ground among a somewhat","PeriodicalId":431930,"journal":{"name":"Peace Through Law","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: Versailles and the Broadening of ‘Peace Through Law’\",\"authors\":\"M. Erpelding\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/9783845299167-11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On 9 May 1919, a little more than forty-eight hours after the Allies had handed over the text of the Versailles Treaty to the representatives of Germany, a small ceremonial dinner was held at the Hôtel Bedford, in the fashionable 8th arrondissement of Paris. As one American attendee later wrote to his wife, it was a high-brow affair. The guest list included a grandnephew of Napoleon I, Prince Roland-Napoléon Bonaparte, and Albert I, Prince of Monaco. However, like their host, the British barrister and academic Sir Thomas Barclay, most of the twenty or so diners were highly regarded authorities on international law. They were also members of the Institut de Droit International (IDI), which, a few hours earlier, had concluded an extraordinary two-day session at the Ceremonial Hall of the Paris Law Faculty. All were gathered to honour the man whose ideas were profoundly changing the way people thought about international relations and international law: the President of the United States of America, Woodrow Wilson.1 The IDI had not convened since its Oxford session in August 1913—its subsequent session, meant to take place in Munich in September of the following year, had been cancelled after the summer of 1914 had ended in mobilization and war.2 Founded in 1873 as a reaction to the Franco–Prussian war of 1870–1871, the IDI had vowed to ‘promote the progress of international law’ . By declaring that they would ‘[strive] to formulate the general principles of the subject, in such a way as to correspond to the legal conscience of the civilized world’ , its members had openly challenged the monopoly of governments over international law.3 The idea that international disputes might be better resolved by legal experts rather than governements or diplomats had also been gaining ground among a somewhat\",\"PeriodicalId\":431930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peace Through Law\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peace Through Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845299167-11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peace Through Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845299167-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
1919年5月9日,在协约国将《凡尔赛条约》文本交给德国代表48个多小时后,在时尚的巴黎第八区Hôtel贝德福德举行了一场小型的礼仪晚宴。正如一位美国与会者后来写给他妻子的信中所说,这是一场高雅的活动。宾客名单上包括拿破仑一世的侄孙、罗兰-拿破仑·波拿巴王子和摩纳哥王子阿尔伯特一世。然而,就像他们的主人、英国律师兼学者托马斯•巴克莱爵士(Sir Thomas Barclay)一样,大约20位用餐者中的大多数人都是备受尊敬的国际法权威。他们也是国际法学会(法学会)的成员,该学会几小时前刚刚在巴黎法学院礼仪厅结束了为期两天的特别会议。所有的人都聚集在一起纪念这个人,他的思想深刻地改变了人们对国际关系和国际法的看法:美利坚合众国总统伍德罗·威尔逊。自1913年8月的牛津会议以来,IDI就没有召开过会议,原定于次年9月在慕尼黑举行的下一次会议在1914年夏天以动员和战争结束后被取消了作为对1870-1871年普法战争的回应,国际法联于1873年成立,誓言要“促进国际法的进步”。通过宣称他们将“(努力)制定主体的一般原则,以符合文明世界的法律良知的方式”,其成员公开挑战了政府对国际法的垄断国际争端最好由法律专家而不是政府或外交官来解决,这一观点也在一些人当中得到了支持
Introduction: Versailles and the Broadening of ‘Peace Through Law’
On 9 May 1919, a little more than forty-eight hours after the Allies had handed over the text of the Versailles Treaty to the representatives of Germany, a small ceremonial dinner was held at the Hôtel Bedford, in the fashionable 8th arrondissement of Paris. As one American attendee later wrote to his wife, it was a high-brow affair. The guest list included a grandnephew of Napoleon I, Prince Roland-Napoléon Bonaparte, and Albert I, Prince of Monaco. However, like their host, the British barrister and academic Sir Thomas Barclay, most of the twenty or so diners were highly regarded authorities on international law. They were also members of the Institut de Droit International (IDI), which, a few hours earlier, had concluded an extraordinary two-day session at the Ceremonial Hall of the Paris Law Faculty. All were gathered to honour the man whose ideas were profoundly changing the way people thought about international relations and international law: the President of the United States of America, Woodrow Wilson.1 The IDI had not convened since its Oxford session in August 1913—its subsequent session, meant to take place in Munich in September of the following year, had been cancelled after the summer of 1914 had ended in mobilization and war.2 Founded in 1873 as a reaction to the Franco–Prussian war of 1870–1871, the IDI had vowed to ‘promote the progress of international law’ . By declaring that they would ‘[strive] to formulate the general principles of the subject, in such a way as to correspond to the legal conscience of the civilized world’ , its members had openly challenged the monopoly of governments over international law.3 The idea that international disputes might be better resolved by legal experts rather than governements or diplomats had also been gaining ground among a somewhat