新手和专家的分歧

N. Ballantyne
{"title":"新手和专家的分歧","authors":"N. Ballantyne","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190847289.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Novices must trust experts, but novices face uncertainty when the experts do not agree. To defer reasonably to one expert over another, we need to identify an epistemological asymmetry between them, but this chapter argues we are often not well-poised to distinguish between rival experts.","PeriodicalId":345622,"journal":{"name":"Knowing Our Limits","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novices and Expert Disagreement\",\"authors\":\"N. Ballantyne\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780190847289.003.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Novices must trust experts, but novices face uncertainty when the experts do not agree. To defer reasonably to one expert over another, we need to identify an epistemological asymmetry between them, but this chapter argues we are often not well-poised to distinguish between rival experts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knowing Our Limits\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knowing Our Limits\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190847289.003.0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowing Our Limits","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190847289.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新手必须信任专家,但当专家不同意时,新手面临不确定性。为了合理地听从一个专家而不是另一个专家,我们需要确定他们之间认识论上的不对称,但本章认为,我们往往无法很好地区分敌对的专家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Novices and Expert Disagreement
Novices must trust experts, but novices face uncertainty when the experts do not agree. To defer reasonably to one expert over another, we need to identify an epistemological asymmetry between them, but this chapter argues we are often not well-poised to distinguish between rival experts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信