最新研究:体面的工资如何改变生活质量——通过摆脱工作贫困陷阱

S. Carr, A. Young-Hauser, Darrin Hodgetts, Wiebke Schmidt, Lauren E Moran, J. Haar, J. Parker, J. Arrowsmith, Harvey Jones, Siautu Alefaio
{"title":"最新研究:体面的工资如何改变生活质量——通过摆脱工作贫困陷阱","authors":"S. Carr, A. Young-Hauser, Darrin Hodgetts, Wiebke Schmidt, Lauren E Moran, J. Haar, J. Parker, J. Arrowsmith, Harvey Jones, Siautu Alefaio","doi":"10.20900/JSR20210012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research in this journal has suggested that job satisfaction and other job attitudes in New Zealand undergo a quantitative shift upwards once wages cross a pivotal wage range. However, the focus did not extend to actual changes in qualities of living beyond work. A fresh analysis of additional qualitative responses to the question, “How well does your wage work for you?”, from the same survey of N = 1011 low-income workers across New Zealand, content-analysed diverse qualities of living along a wage spectrum from Minimum to Living Wage, crossed with household income net of own pay (using median wage as a splitting factor). Converging with the quantitative research reported earlier, there was a reliable pivot range upwards in qualities of living as wages first rose from Minimum Wage, to become transformational after crossing the Living Wage value. This transformational effect of a Living Wage was most clearly pivotal when there was no buffer from any other incomes in the same household. A further, more idiographic analysis of case “outliers” from the wage-wellbeing curve (lower wage-higher satisfaction, plus higher wage-lower satisfaction) revealed additional contextual factors that moderated and mediated qualities of living. Examples included acute sense of a workplace injustice and reduced mental wellbeing. Such factors further inform the ILO’s and UN’s 2016–30 Decent Work Agenda, which includes justice and wellbeing at work.","PeriodicalId":275909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainability Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research Update: How Decent Wages Transform Qualities of Living—By Affording Escape from Working Poverty Trap\",\"authors\":\"S. Carr, A. Young-Hauser, Darrin Hodgetts, Wiebke Schmidt, Lauren E Moran, J. Haar, J. Parker, J. Arrowsmith, Harvey Jones, Siautu Alefaio\",\"doi\":\"10.20900/JSR20210012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research in this journal has suggested that job satisfaction and other job attitudes in New Zealand undergo a quantitative shift upwards once wages cross a pivotal wage range. However, the focus did not extend to actual changes in qualities of living beyond work. A fresh analysis of additional qualitative responses to the question, “How well does your wage work for you?”, from the same survey of N = 1011 low-income workers across New Zealand, content-analysed diverse qualities of living along a wage spectrum from Minimum to Living Wage, crossed with household income net of own pay (using median wage as a splitting factor). Converging with the quantitative research reported earlier, there was a reliable pivot range upwards in qualities of living as wages first rose from Minimum Wage, to become transformational after crossing the Living Wage value. This transformational effect of a Living Wage was most clearly pivotal when there was no buffer from any other incomes in the same household. A further, more idiographic analysis of case “outliers” from the wage-wellbeing curve (lower wage-higher satisfaction, plus higher wage-lower satisfaction) revealed additional contextual factors that moderated and mediated qualities of living. Examples included acute sense of a workplace injustice and reduced mental wellbeing. Such factors further inform the ILO’s and UN’s 2016–30 Decent Work Agenda, which includes justice and wellbeing at work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sustainability Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sustainability Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20900/JSR20210012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainability Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20900/JSR20210012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本刊的研究表明,新西兰的工作满意度和其他工作态度,一旦工资越过一个关键的工资范围,就会发生数量上的上升。但是,重点并没有扩大到工作以外生活质量的实际变化。对“你的工资对你有多好?”这个问题的额外定性回答进行了新的分析。,对新西兰各地N = 1011名低收入工人进行了同样的调查,内容分析了从最低工资到生活工资的工资范围内的各种生活质量,与家庭收入净额(使用工资中位数作为分割因素)交叉。与之前报道的定量研究相一致的是,随着工资首先从最低工资上升到超过生活工资值后的转型,生活质量有一个可靠的枢轴范围。当同一家庭没有其他收入作为缓冲时,最低生活工资的这种转变效果最为明显。进一步,对工资-幸福曲线(低工资-高满意度,加上高工资-低满意度)的案例“异常值”进行了更具体的分析,揭示了调节和调节生活质量的其他背景因素。例子包括对工作场所不公正的强烈感觉和心理健康状况的下降。这些因素进一步推动了国际劳工组织和联合国的《2016 - 2030年体面工作议程》,其中包括工作中的正义和福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research Update: How Decent Wages Transform Qualities of Living—By Affording Escape from Working Poverty Trap
Research in this journal has suggested that job satisfaction and other job attitudes in New Zealand undergo a quantitative shift upwards once wages cross a pivotal wage range. However, the focus did not extend to actual changes in qualities of living beyond work. A fresh analysis of additional qualitative responses to the question, “How well does your wage work for you?”, from the same survey of N = 1011 low-income workers across New Zealand, content-analysed diverse qualities of living along a wage spectrum from Minimum to Living Wage, crossed with household income net of own pay (using median wage as a splitting factor). Converging with the quantitative research reported earlier, there was a reliable pivot range upwards in qualities of living as wages first rose from Minimum Wage, to become transformational after crossing the Living Wage value. This transformational effect of a Living Wage was most clearly pivotal when there was no buffer from any other incomes in the same household. A further, more idiographic analysis of case “outliers” from the wage-wellbeing curve (lower wage-higher satisfaction, plus higher wage-lower satisfaction) revealed additional contextual factors that moderated and mediated qualities of living. Examples included acute sense of a workplace injustice and reduced mental wellbeing. Such factors further inform the ILO’s and UN’s 2016–30 Decent Work Agenda, which includes justice and wellbeing at work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信