{"title":"关于古罗马运动会的一些误解","authors":"Ulrich Schädler","doi":"10.2478/bgs-2021-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Henry Parker is at the origin of some false ideas as to the age and history of certain board games, especially of Mancala and Merels. Having spent 30 years in what today is called Sri Lanka, where he had worked for the Irrigation Department from 1873 to 1904, he published his “Ancient Ceylon” in 1909. It is in this book that he talks at some length about the designs engraved into the stone blocks that cover the roof of the temple of Sethos I in el-Qurna near Thebes (Upper Egypt), erected in the 14th century B.C.1 We do not know, when exactly Parker visited the site. Until today, Parker remains the only one to document and publish these patterns, which are of different nature: some are geometric patterns, others are outlines of feet and hands, still others are crosses of different type and shape, and finally there are more complex symbolic compositions. Some of the patterns resemble game boards for Mancala (p. 589), Nine men’s morris, Three men’s morris or Alquerque. Parker thought that all those designs were cut at the same time by the workmen in charge of the construction of the temple, i.e. 1370-60 BCE (p. 646, 578). He based this assumption on his observation of three drawings that were partially cut away when the stones were finally trimmed to their definite shape: a pentagram with a sign in the centre, a circle crossed by three intersecting lines (like a Chi-Rho christogram) and another circle with three or maybe four intersecting lines.2 It must be said","PeriodicalId":285053,"journal":{"name":"Board Game Studies Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some Misconceptions About Ancient Roman Games\",\"authors\":\"Ulrich Schädler\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/bgs-2021-0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Henry Parker is at the origin of some false ideas as to the age and history of certain board games, especially of Mancala and Merels. Having spent 30 years in what today is called Sri Lanka, where he had worked for the Irrigation Department from 1873 to 1904, he published his “Ancient Ceylon” in 1909. It is in this book that he talks at some length about the designs engraved into the stone blocks that cover the roof of the temple of Sethos I in el-Qurna near Thebes (Upper Egypt), erected in the 14th century B.C.1 We do not know, when exactly Parker visited the site. Until today, Parker remains the only one to document and publish these patterns, which are of different nature: some are geometric patterns, others are outlines of feet and hands, still others are crosses of different type and shape, and finally there are more complex symbolic compositions. Some of the patterns resemble game boards for Mancala (p. 589), Nine men’s morris, Three men’s morris or Alquerque. Parker thought that all those designs were cut at the same time by the workmen in charge of the construction of the temple, i.e. 1370-60 BCE (p. 646, 578). He based this assumption on his observation of three drawings that were partially cut away when the stones were finally trimmed to their definite shape: a pentagram with a sign in the centre, a circle crossed by three intersecting lines (like a Chi-Rho christogram) and another circle with three or maybe four intersecting lines.2 It must be said\",\"PeriodicalId\":285053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Board Game Studies Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Board Game Studies Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/bgs-2021-0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Board Game Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/bgs-2021-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
Henry Parker对某些桌游的年龄和历史,尤其是Mancala和Merels,提出了一些错误的观点。1873年至1904年,他在今天的斯里兰卡为灌溉部门工作,在那里呆了30年,并于1909年出版了他的《古锡兰》。正是在这本书中,他详细地谈到了刻在覆盖底比斯(上埃及)附近el-Qurna的塞索斯一世神庙屋顶上的石块上的图案,这座神庙建于公元前14世纪我们不知道帕克到底是什么时候去的。直到今天,帕克仍然是唯一一个记录和发表这些图案的人,这些图案具有不同的性质:有些是几何图案,有些是脚和手的轮廓,还有一些是不同类型和形状的十字架,最后还有更复杂的符号组成。有些图案类似于《Mancala》、《Nine men’s morris》、《Three men’s morris》或《Alquerque》的棋盘。帕克认为,所有这些图案都是由负责建造神庙的工人在同一时间切割的,即公元前1370-60年(第646页,第578页)。他的这一假设是基于他对三幅画的观察,这三幅画是在石头最终被修整成确定形状时被部分切割掉的:一幅中间有一个符号的五角星,一幅由三条相交线交叉的圆圈(就像Chi-Rho图形),另一幅由三条或四条相交线交叉的圆圈必须说
Henry Parker is at the origin of some false ideas as to the age and history of certain board games, especially of Mancala and Merels. Having spent 30 years in what today is called Sri Lanka, where he had worked for the Irrigation Department from 1873 to 1904, he published his “Ancient Ceylon” in 1909. It is in this book that he talks at some length about the designs engraved into the stone blocks that cover the roof of the temple of Sethos I in el-Qurna near Thebes (Upper Egypt), erected in the 14th century B.C.1 We do not know, when exactly Parker visited the site. Until today, Parker remains the only one to document and publish these patterns, which are of different nature: some are geometric patterns, others are outlines of feet and hands, still others are crosses of different type and shape, and finally there are more complex symbolic compositions. Some of the patterns resemble game boards for Mancala (p. 589), Nine men’s morris, Three men’s morris or Alquerque. Parker thought that all those designs were cut at the same time by the workmen in charge of the construction of the temple, i.e. 1370-60 BCE (p. 646, 578). He based this assumption on his observation of three drawings that were partially cut away when the stones were finally trimmed to their definite shape: a pentagram with a sign in the centre, a circle crossed by three intersecting lines (like a Chi-Rho christogram) and another circle with three or maybe four intersecting lines.2 It must be said