{"title":"国际海洋法法庭作为合议庭的咨询职能的法律基础:一个未解决的问题","authors":"Jianjun Gao","doi":"10.54007/ijmaf.2012.4.1.83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Under the present provisions of the LOS Convention and the ITLOS Statute, there is no legal basis for the advisory function of the ITLOS as a full court. And the subsequent practice and implied powers doctrine can not provide legal basis for the ITLOS in this respect either. The ITLOS may acquire the advisory function through the amendment of its Statute by the states parties to the LOS Convention. Furthermore, the advisory jurisdiction provided for in article 138 of the ITLOS Rules is not appropriate, for it can be used by states to request opinions as regards the controversy or even disputes between them.","PeriodicalId":278094,"journal":{"name":"KMI International Journal of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Legal Basis of the Advisory Function of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea as A Full Court: An Unresolved Issue\",\"authors\":\"Jianjun Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.54007/ijmaf.2012.4.1.83\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Under the present provisions of the LOS Convention and the ITLOS Statute, there is no legal basis for the advisory function of the ITLOS as a full court. And the subsequent practice and implied powers doctrine can not provide legal basis for the ITLOS in this respect either. The ITLOS may acquire the advisory function through the amendment of its Statute by the states parties to the LOS Convention. Furthermore, the advisory jurisdiction provided for in article 138 of the ITLOS Rules is not appropriate, for it can be used by states to request opinions as regards the controversy or even disputes between them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":278094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KMI International Journal of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries\",\"volume\":\"127 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KMI International Journal of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54007/ijmaf.2012.4.1.83\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KMI International Journal of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54007/ijmaf.2012.4.1.83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Legal Basis of the Advisory Function of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea as A Full Court: An Unresolved Issue
Under the present provisions of the LOS Convention and the ITLOS Statute, there is no legal basis for the advisory function of the ITLOS as a full court. And the subsequent practice and implied powers doctrine can not provide legal basis for the ITLOS in this respect either. The ITLOS may acquire the advisory function through the amendment of its Statute by the states parties to the LOS Convention. Furthermore, the advisory jurisdiction provided for in article 138 of the ITLOS Rules is not appropriate, for it can be used by states to request opinions as regards the controversy or even disputes between them.