国际海洋法法庭作为合议庭的咨询职能的法律基础:一个未解决的问题

Jianjun Gao
{"title":"国际海洋法法庭作为合议庭的咨询职能的法律基础:一个未解决的问题","authors":"Jianjun Gao","doi":"10.54007/ijmaf.2012.4.1.83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Under the present provisions of the LOS Convention and the ITLOS Statute, there is no legal basis for the advisory function of the ITLOS as a full court. And the subsequent practice and implied powers doctrine can not provide legal basis for the ITLOS in this respect either. The ITLOS may acquire the advisory function through the amendment of its Statute by the states parties to the LOS Convention. Furthermore, the advisory jurisdiction provided for in article 138 of the ITLOS Rules is not appropriate, for it can be used by states to request opinions as regards the controversy or even disputes between them.","PeriodicalId":278094,"journal":{"name":"KMI International Journal of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Legal Basis of the Advisory Function of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea as A Full Court: An Unresolved Issue\",\"authors\":\"Jianjun Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.54007/ijmaf.2012.4.1.83\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Under the present provisions of the LOS Convention and the ITLOS Statute, there is no legal basis for the advisory function of the ITLOS as a full court. And the subsequent practice and implied powers doctrine can not provide legal basis for the ITLOS in this respect either. The ITLOS may acquire the advisory function through the amendment of its Statute by the states parties to the LOS Convention. Furthermore, the advisory jurisdiction provided for in article 138 of the ITLOS Rules is not appropriate, for it can be used by states to request opinions as regards the controversy or even disputes between them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":278094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KMI International Journal of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries\",\"volume\":\"127 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KMI International Journal of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54007/ijmaf.2012.4.1.83\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KMI International Journal of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54007/ijmaf.2012.4.1.83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

根据《国际海洋法法庭公约》和《国际海洋法法庭规约》的现行规定,国际海洋法法庭作为一个正式法院的咨询职能没有法律依据。而其后的实践和默示权力学说也不能为国际海洋法法庭在这方面提供法律依据。国际海洋法法庭可通过《国际海洋法法庭公约》缔约国对其规约的修正获得咨询职能。此外,《国际海洋法法庭规则》第138条规定的咨询管辖权是不适当的,因为各国可以利用它就它们之间的争议甚至争端征求意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Legal Basis of the Advisory Function of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea as A Full Court: An Unresolved Issue
Under the present provisions of the LOS Convention and the ITLOS Statute, there is no legal basis for the advisory function of the ITLOS as a full court. And the subsequent practice and implied powers doctrine can not provide legal basis for the ITLOS in this respect either. The ITLOS may acquire the advisory function through the amendment of its Statute by the states parties to the LOS Convention. Furthermore, the advisory jurisdiction provided for in article 138 of the ITLOS Rules is not appropriate, for it can be used by states to request opinions as regards the controversy or even disputes between them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信