亚齐习惯司法判决在解决盗窃罪的法律保证

Khairul Riza, Irpan Husein Lubis, Nicha Suwalla
{"title":"亚齐习惯司法判决在解决盗窃罪的法律保证","authors":"Khairul Riza, Irpan Husein Lubis, Nicha Suwalla","doi":"10.35912/jihham.v2i1.1580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of writing this journal is to find out the authority of the customary court in resolving criminal acts of theft, to find out the factors that cause the keuchik's decision to have no legal certainty, and to find out the obstacles and efforts to resolve crimes that were resolved by the keuchik through customary justice. Methodology: The method used is empirical juridical research, namely research through a series of field interviews with respondents and informants. Results: The results of the study show that, the authority of customary justice in resolving criminal acts of theft is in accordance with what is stipulated in Qanun Number 9 of 2008 against light-scale theft crimes involving the residents of the gampong concerned, but sometimes also against heavier scale theft crimes. Limitations: Obstacles to the settlement of criminal acts resolved by the keuchik through customary justice, namely the difficulty of uniting good opinions between conflicting parties, obstacles to the bureaucratization of customary courts that depend on the government, lack of socialization of customary justice by the government to the community, and lack of coordination with other law enforcement agencies in conventional justice system. Contribution: The efforts made to overcome these obstacles are increasing the socialization of customary justice, strengthening the capacity of traditional justice personnel and institutions, building cooperation between institutions and the commitment and seriousness of the Regional Government in supporting the implementation of customary justice. Keywords: 1. Legal Certainty 2. Customary Justice 3. Crime","PeriodicalId":206002,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia","volume":"157 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Putusan Peradilan Adat Aceh dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Pencurian\",\"authors\":\"Khairul Riza, Irpan Husein Lubis, Nicha Suwalla\",\"doi\":\"10.35912/jihham.v2i1.1580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of writing this journal is to find out the authority of the customary court in resolving criminal acts of theft, to find out the factors that cause the keuchik's decision to have no legal certainty, and to find out the obstacles and efforts to resolve crimes that were resolved by the keuchik through customary justice. Methodology: The method used is empirical juridical research, namely research through a series of field interviews with respondents and informants. Results: The results of the study show that, the authority of customary justice in resolving criminal acts of theft is in accordance with what is stipulated in Qanun Number 9 of 2008 against light-scale theft crimes involving the residents of the gampong concerned, but sometimes also against heavier scale theft crimes. Limitations: Obstacles to the settlement of criminal acts resolved by the keuchik through customary justice, namely the difficulty of uniting good opinions between conflicting parties, obstacles to the bureaucratization of customary courts that depend on the government, lack of socialization of customary justice by the government to the community, and lack of coordination with other law enforcement agencies in conventional justice system. Contribution: The efforts made to overcome these obstacles are increasing the socialization of customary justice, strengthening the capacity of traditional justice personnel and institutions, building cooperation between institutions and the commitment and seriousness of the Regional Government in supporting the implementation of customary justice. Keywords: 1. Legal Certainty 2. Customary Justice 3. Crime\",\"PeriodicalId\":206002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia\",\"volume\":\"157 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v2i1.1580\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v2i1.1580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:写作目的:探究习惯法院在解决盗窃犯罪行为方面的权威,探究导致基基族人的决定缺乏法律确定性的因素,探究基基族人通过习惯司法解决犯罪的障碍和努力。方法论:使用的方法是实证法律研究,即通过对受访者和举报人的一系列实地访谈进行研究。结果:研究结果表明,习惯法在解决盗窃犯罪行为中的权威依据是2008年《甘农法典》第9号对涉及甘邦居民的轻规模盗窃犯罪的规定,但有时也适用于较大规模的盗窃犯罪。限制:习惯法解决刑事行为的障碍,即难以统一冲突各方的良好意见;依赖政府的习惯法法院官僚化的障碍;政府对社区缺乏习惯法的社会化;传统司法系统中缺乏与其他执法机构的协调。贡献:为克服这些障碍所作的努力正在增加习惯司法的社会化,加强传统司法人员和机构的能力,在各机构之间建立合作,以及区域政府在支持执行习惯司法方面的承诺和认真态度。关键词:1。法律确定性2。习惯正义犯罪
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Putusan Peradilan Adat Aceh dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Pencurian
Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of writing this journal is to find out the authority of the customary court in resolving criminal acts of theft, to find out the factors that cause the keuchik's decision to have no legal certainty, and to find out the obstacles and efforts to resolve crimes that were resolved by the keuchik through customary justice. Methodology: The method used is empirical juridical research, namely research through a series of field interviews with respondents and informants. Results: The results of the study show that, the authority of customary justice in resolving criminal acts of theft is in accordance with what is stipulated in Qanun Number 9 of 2008 against light-scale theft crimes involving the residents of the gampong concerned, but sometimes also against heavier scale theft crimes. Limitations: Obstacles to the settlement of criminal acts resolved by the keuchik through customary justice, namely the difficulty of uniting good opinions between conflicting parties, obstacles to the bureaucratization of customary courts that depend on the government, lack of socialization of customary justice by the government to the community, and lack of coordination with other law enforcement agencies in conventional justice system. Contribution: The efforts made to overcome these obstacles are increasing the socialization of customary justice, strengthening the capacity of traditional justice personnel and institutions, building cooperation between institutions and the commitment and seriousness of the Regional Government in supporting the implementation of customary justice. Keywords: 1. Legal Certainty 2. Customary Justice 3. Crime
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信