{"title":"监管和萨班斯-奥克斯利法案","authors":"O. Hart","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-679X.2009.00329.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many of the papers in this special issue are concerned with regulation and some with Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX). In this commentary I will begin by summarizing the arguments for regulation that have been made in the literature.1 I will then consider whether these arguments apply to SOX. I will suggest that, rather than being based on sound principles, regulation often seems to be a consequence of the public’s need for action in response to a crisis, and that this was the case with SOX .I will argue that the recent financial meltdown provides another example of the same phenomenon.","PeriodicalId":336554,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Law: Securities Law","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"79","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulation and Sarbanes-Oxley\",\"authors\":\"O. Hart\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1475-679X.2009.00329.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many of the papers in this special issue are concerned with regulation and some with Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX). In this commentary I will begin by summarizing the arguments for regulation that have been made in the literature.1 I will then consider whether these arguments apply to SOX. I will suggest that, rather than being based on sound principles, regulation often seems to be a consequence of the public’s need for action in response to a crisis, and that this was the case with SOX .I will argue that the recent financial meltdown provides another example of the same phenomenon.\",\"PeriodicalId\":336554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Law: Securities Law\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"79\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Law: Securities Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2009.00329.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Law: Securities Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2009.00329.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Many of the papers in this special issue are concerned with regulation and some with Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX). In this commentary I will begin by summarizing the arguments for regulation that have been made in the literature.1 I will then consider whether these arguments apply to SOX. I will suggest that, rather than being based on sound principles, regulation often seems to be a consequence of the public’s need for action in response to a crisis, and that this was the case with SOX .I will argue that the recent financial meltdown provides another example of the same phenomenon.