网格环境下作业调度的单目标与多目标调度算法

Michal Ulbricht
{"title":"网格环境下作业调度的单目标与多目标调度算法","authors":"Michal Ulbricht","doi":"10.1109/SAMI.2012.6209001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper the author proves that efficiency of multi-objective algorithms can be compared to single-objective algorithms for scheduling jobs in grid environment. Algorithms are compared via efficiency of reaching best solutions given by objective function. There are two criteria (computation speed and computation cost) presented in objective function including users weights on those criteria. Single-objective algorithms are represented by genetic algorithm and simulated annealing. Class of multi-objective algorithms is represented by improved strong Pareto evolutionary algorithm (SPEA2) and archived multi-objective simulated annealing (AMOSA). Algorithms are compared with best available results (by setting the best input parameters found) in ten, twenty, forty, sixty, eighty and one hundred second runs for one hundred experiments each.","PeriodicalId":158731,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-objective vs. multi-objective scheduling algorithms for scheduling jobs in grid environment\",\"authors\":\"Michal Ulbricht\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SAMI.2012.6209001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper the author proves that efficiency of multi-objective algorithms can be compared to single-objective algorithms for scheduling jobs in grid environment. Algorithms are compared via efficiency of reaching best solutions given by objective function. There are two criteria (computation speed and computation cost) presented in objective function including users weights on those criteria. Single-objective algorithms are represented by genetic algorithm and simulated annealing. Class of multi-objective algorithms is represented by improved strong Pareto evolutionary algorithm (SPEA2) and archived multi-objective simulated annealing (AMOSA). Algorithms are compared with best available results (by setting the best input parameters found) in ten, twenty, forty, sixty, eighty and one hundred second runs for one hundred experiments each.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SAMI.2012.6209001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SAMI.2012.6209001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文证明了在网格环境下,多目标调度算法的效率可以与单目标调度算法相比较。通过目标函数给出的最优解的效率对算法进行比较。在目标函数中给出了计算速度和计算代价两个准则,包括用户在这两个准则上的权重。单目标算法采用遗传算法和模拟退火算法。一类多目标算法由改进的强帕累托进化算法(SPEA2)和存档多目标模拟退火算法(AMOSA)来表示。算法与最佳可用结果(通过设置找到的最佳输入参数)在10秒、20秒、40秒、60秒、80秒和100秒内进行100次实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single-objective vs. multi-objective scheduling algorithms for scheduling jobs in grid environment
In this paper the author proves that efficiency of multi-objective algorithms can be compared to single-objective algorithms for scheduling jobs in grid environment. Algorithms are compared via efficiency of reaching best solutions given by objective function. There are two criteria (computation speed and computation cost) presented in objective function including users weights on those criteria. Single-objective algorithms are represented by genetic algorithm and simulated annealing. Class of multi-objective algorithms is represented by improved strong Pareto evolutionary algorithm (SPEA2) and archived multi-objective simulated annealing (AMOSA). Algorithms are compared with best available results (by setting the best input parameters found) in ten, twenty, forty, sixty, eighty and one hundred second runs for one hundred experiments each.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信